what-happened
GOLD
too bad she got tired of her own schtick.... . . and lock them in a room that plays Rachel Maddow on a loop.
too bad she got tired of her own schtick.... . . and lock them in a room that plays Rachel Maddow on a loop.
Proves my point, well done.
Oddly, you left out the looney he/she pronoun nonsense you want forced upon everyone - you know, ironically the labels you continue to violate yourself.Actually, you are 100% whiny snowflake. Scared of trans women, scared of teenage girl "bullies", scared of liberals, scared of brown people. We're going to take your sports, your guns, your churches and send you and your family to concentration camps where we make your kids to go trans.
There's a lot of analytics in the big soccer programs these days, but the entry price is that a kid has to have ability. From that point onward they will use anything and everything to develop, manage & measure, but continued development of ability remains the price of entry or price to remain. They only have so many spots and so much patience - Chelsea released/sold Salah, De Bruyn & Lukaku for example.Yeah, this is exactly where I'm going. Parents would not go for it. Pay to play clubs would not go for it. But developmental academies like the idea, for both concepts of development and less altruistic reasons (sounds like an easy way to split an A team from a B team to me). But what if you could have a way to, imperfectly but with a measurable degree of success, sort out some of those traits even earlier? Pre-sort them. Developmental programs with strong financial incentives would probably have a definite interest in that.
Interesting, given the direction this thread has gone. Your choice of a presumably popular predominantly women's TV show is bound to trigger (not my rules), or maybe not, as there is often selective outrage towards line straddlers and the occasional "good game" butt slappers - entertaining nonetheless.That's what I listen to, to fall asleep at night. Want to torture someone put Joy Behar on loop, just remove the knives from the room. IQ test them after a week and see if they can hit double digits.
In the end the arguments boil down to this.
One small but vocal side thinks it is OK to discriminate against women by letting men compete against them.
The other side knows that there is a reason we created women's sports, and that it is a travesty to allow men to compete in those women's sports.
All of you are really going to love the title "Mx." to replace "Mr." and "Ms."
Actually, you are 100% whiny snowflake. Scared of trans women, scared of teenage girl "bullies", scared of liberals, scared of brown people. We're going to take your sports, your guns, your churches and send you and your family to concentration camps where we make your kids to go trans.
Why do you want to discriminate against women?All of you are really going to love the title "Mx." to replace "Mr." and "Ms."
Except most people won't ever use "Mx.". Just like most Latinos don't say "Latinx".All of you are really going to love the title "Mx." to replace "Mr." and "Ms."
There's a lot of analytics in the big soccer programs these days, but the entry price is that a kid has to have ability. From that point onward they will use anything and everything to develop, manage & measure, but continued development of ability remains the price of entry or price to remain. They only have so many spots and so much patience - Chelsea released/sold Salah, De Bruyn & Lukaku for example.
Ironically the most likely to be triggered have lost the moral high ground when it comes to the defense of women. Women only seem important to them when they can be used as pawns to further their narrative.Interesting, given the direction this thread has gone. Your choice of a presumably popular predominantly women's TV show is bound to trigger (not my rules), or maybe not, as there is often selective outrage towards line straddlers and the occasional "good game" butt slappers - entertaining nonetheless.
Are you a Republican? The GOP is the home of token representation (aka using people to further their narrative) . . . “Where’s my African American?”. So if you are, which you certainly represent as, your above statement is a fine example of projected hypocrisy.Ironically the most likely to be triggered have lost the moral high ground when it comes to the defense of women. Women only seem important to them when they can be used as pawns to further their narrative.
There you go again...kneeling at the alter of whataboutism. Which African Americans are you exactly talking about?Are you a Republican? The GOP is the home of token representation (aka using people to further their narrative) . . . “Where’s my African American?”. So if you are, which you certainly represent as, your above statement is a fine example of projected hypocrisy.
Are you a Republican? The GOP is the home of token representation (aka using people to further their narrative) . . . “Where’s my African American?”. So if you are, which you certainly represent as, your above statement is a fine example of projected hypocrisy.
There you go again...kneeling at the alter of whataboutism. Which African Americans are you exactly talking about?