Agree - definitely anecdotal.
www.foxnews.com
Agree - definitely anecdotal.
Are you good with this headline?
CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective
CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective
A new study concluding lockdowns 'should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument' was ignored by the vast majority of the liberal media.
www.snopes.com
Then where's the study the says restrictions and lockdowns worked? It's easy to criticize but hard to create. Wouldn't you think if they had that evidence they would be shouting it from the rooftops to support their continued policies? Sometimes its what you don't hear that's more important than what you do hear. You've been around long enough to understand that.Looks like the reason they passed on the story might be that they did better fact-checking than FN did.
The viral “Johns Hopkins study” about lockdowns was not the work of Johns Hopkins University, it was not peer-reviewed, and it was not written by epidemiologists. A number of researchers have also taken issue with the methods used in this study.
Here's What We Know About 'Johns Hopkins Study' on Lockdowns
It's a non-peer reviewed working paper that has not been endorsed by the university.
www.allsides.com
Then where's the study the says restrictions and lockdowns worked? It's easy to criticize but hard to create. Wouldn't you think if they had that evidence they would be shouting it from the rooftops to support their continued policies? Sometimes its what you don't hear that's more important than what you do hear. You've been around long enough to understand that.
And to use some of your own medicine.
Snopes Media Bias Rating
Learn the AllSides Media Bias Rating of Snopes. AllSides rates the media bias of hundreds of news outlets, media sources and writers.
www.reuters.com
www.theguardian.com
I seriously can’t understand the people who are angry at Ted Cruz and Rand Paul for defying Senate masking protocols, or Youngkin for going without a mask into a mask optional supermarket, but are ok with this. Hopefully it is a very small group.
I can't support a headline with the word "lockdown", because that word itself is too imprecise.Agree - definitely anecdotal.
Are you good with this headline?
CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective
CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo completely avoid Johns Hopkins study finding COVID lockdowns ineffective
A new study concluding lockdowns 'should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument' was ignored by the vast majority of the liberal media.
No argument with the first point. As to your second point above, I’m not sure the “place” to raise the accusation still exists. The best we can do is one partisan publication calling out another partisan publication.
www.city-journal.org
Looks like the reason they passed on the story might be that they did better fact-checking than FN did.
The viral “Johns Hopkins study” about lockdowns was not the work of Johns Hopkins University, it was not peer-reviewed, and it was not written by epidemiologists. A number of researchers have also taken issue with the methods used in this study.
Here's What We Know About 'Johns Hopkins Study' on Lockdowns
It's a non-peer reviewed working paper that has not been endorsed by the university.
There are decent information sources on the right. Fox just isn’t one of them. The Economist could easily run a credible story on media blindspots like the one you mentioned.
This is Exhibit A for the left's misguided belief that children should be protecting adults. Crazy how we're living in an upside down world.
Are you staying the CNN hasn’t also deliberately lied to its Viewers?
Yes, that sucks - as do the lies CNN promoted about theories that COVID originated in a lab being debunked. They have also been running cover for Fauci's lies about gain-of-function. There have been numerous omissions of context in their reporting. That is what advocates do - not journalists. Context has been lacking from the beginning and with more data coming out it is becoming increasingly obvious that the practice of journalism is pretty much dead in real-time "reporting". CNN has consistently run cover for the lies and hypocrisies of our current leadership while endorsing the suppression of legitimate questions. Fox is on the other side of this but, like it or not, it is the only chance we have of understanding what the "other side" is thinking.
