Don't you get the sense that "experts" are tossing things up against the wall and waiting to see what sticks. For every study, there is another study that contradicts, or a study that gets thrown out. Viral load is a great example of a split in opinions and data. Some show/think viral load matters, some think/show viral load can't be correlated to really anything. Frustrating for many "run of the mill" medical professionals. Many tend to ignore these studies and go with their training and deal with the symptoms in front of them. Usually good practice by experienced medical professionals, none of which are on the news networks promoting their books.
This leads us to vaccine hesitancy. There is a major healthcare system in Arizona is running about 60% not vaccinated workers, by choice. If the system decides to follow through on threats, there won't be many healthcare workers to found. Interesting dilemma. Last year they were heroes, this year they are killers of the vaccinated.
It's interesting to see how much regard is given to talking heads on TV who haven't practiced in years. In spite of what the media likes to spew, plenty of Ivermectin, Hydroxy, etc are being prescribed - with many, many positive outcomes. MDs tend to know their patients, do their own research, and are generally smart. Of course, you will have people who will venture to the feed store and the pet store and attempt to self medicate. Never a good option.
And masking, well, polarizing to say the least. There was a time when masking during surgery was questioned. Mainly as a cost saving option, but it was questioned and studies were done. There was enough data to support both sides...imagine that.