Vaccine

The language he uses suggests some bipolar tendency
Um, don't you have to visit another pole to be bipolar? I'd say he is far more uni-polar than bipolar, although I'm pretty sure its just an act, he's playing a character under the anonymity of an online forum. If he was that mentally ill he wouldn't be able to logon. Another alternative is that he is a Gender Studies instructor at the local JC.
 
So the beat goes on. Have to be vaccinated or have a negative test with 72hrs to attend the games or events. People are going to be turned away at the LAFC games and the Halloween events like at Universal.


Number of people I guess including some HS or club coaches are losing jobs besides just medical professionals. Long time manager at a place where one of our young adults works was put on leave yesterday and was not allowed to enter the facility. Getting real...
Fully vaccinated, or proof of negative test, and.....masked.. Science.

Always makes me laught when they say proof of negative test 72 hrs prior. I suppose they could be more sciency and demand proof of isolation as well.
 
100%. Grace gives some good reasons. The left has this odd and apparently fear based mentality where its the children's responsibility to protect adults. Like I said before this is like not allowing kids on the Titanic for fear they might panic and flip the lifeboats and kill adults. If you think that school closures and mask and vaccine mandates are for the protection of children you need to take a deeper dive into the data.

I don't recall you calling out EOTL/GG on any of his inappropriate comments, so pot meet kettle. If you think his name calling, venom and blatant mischaracterizations are even remotely close to what the right leaning posters say here I question your observational skills. With maybe one exception, the right leaning posters tend to post facts for their arguments whereas the left leaning tend to post emotions and insults. Recall that EOTL has already been kicked off this forum once.

And as far as calling out others outside this board, how many on the left called the summer riots vs the right that called out the Jan 6 riot? You'll find that the right was far more critical of the 6th then the left of the summer riots. If you recall McConnell spoke out on the Senate floor and called out the rioters and Trump. Did Pelosi or anyone on the left do the same about the summer riots aka the "Summer of Love"?

I'm hardly the poster child for a male, white Trump righty (who I never voted for). I'm agnostic, pro-choice, socially liberal, small government minded and fiscal conservative, who try's to base his opinions on the evidence. My koolaid is more purple than red.
A better description is that adults, right and left, have successfully opposed most adult mandates.

And, when there is a mandate on adults, they complain LOUDLY. The mandate gets weakened or repealed and the kid mandate is what remains.
 
A better description is that adults, right and left, have successfully opposed most adult mandates.

And, when there is a mandate on adults, they complain LOUDLY. The mandate gets weakened or repealed and the kid mandate is what remains.
You may be right to some extent, but that doesn't make it right to put these burdens on kids because they can't fight back. It's abuse of kids and its abuse of power. I just can't rationalize it like you do. I'm kind of meh with many of the adult mandates, but when you lose your job because you won't subject yourself to medical treatment that the government has decided is the preferred treatment despite the fact there are alternatives that may actually be superior. That is incredibly troubling.
 
A better description is that adults, right and left, have successfully opposed most adult mandates.

And, when there is a mandate on adults, they complain LOUDLY. The mandate gets weakened or repealed and the kid mandate is what remains.

The US is one of the few countries mandating masks on the very young. Many European countries have decided that vaccination should not be required for the very young. Most of Europe had schools open when the US had them closed. So something is very different from the way the US handled children than from how Europe did.
 
Deaths per capita and cases per capita are the only meaningful way to compare different areas. Throw in population density and it becomes more meaningful. Do the research and look at North Dakota.
While I agree that's a more appropriate standard its a fools errand to compare states and countries. For every North Dakota, I can raise you a Utah. There are far too many variables (and exceptions) at play to reliably attribute any causation to mandates. Culture has a far more dramatic effect.
 
So we have some friends with very young kids, 2 under the age of 5 and there concerned about the wearing masks requirements of them.

The concern is about them developing there own individual identity. With a mask covering large portions of their face they think that may influence them becoming more independent or not.

Very young kids look in the mirror and discover themselves as independent unique individuals. With the masks they have a harder time doing that and that can depersonalize them and make them feel more submissive or controlled.

Not here to debate about masks but if we had preschool age kids think I would try to find or do something for them that's different vs the status quo at least where we live in SoCal.
 
So we have some friends with very young kids, 2 under the age of 5 and there concerned about the wearing masks requirements of them.

The concern is about them developing there own individual identity. With a mask covering large portions of their face they think that may influence them becoming more independent or not.

Very young kids look in the mirror and discover themselves as independent unique individuals. With the masks they have a harder time doing that and that can depersonalize them and make them more submissive.

Not here to debate about masks but if we had preschool age kids think I would try to find or do something for them that's different vs the status quo at least where we live in SoCal.

The other big issue with that age group has been kids with conditions such as ADHD or autism, or kids that have learning needs such as slow speech and slow readers (which learn through observing faces of the teacher and other stuff), or (obviously) the deaf (for which this entire thing has been an absolute nightmare).

On the other hand, if I had a child with Downs, I wouldn't be comfortable sending them into the group care environment right now, even if everyone were mandated to wear N95 masks.

The stupid thing for this age group is that because of the choking concern, many jurisdictions prohibit the masks while napping (and of course they all nap together)...which makes a lot of this just security theatre.
 
So we have some friends with very young kids, 2 under the age of 5 and there concerned about the wearing masks requirements of them.

The concern is about them developing there own individual identity. With a mask covering large portions of their face they think that may influence them becoming more independent or not.

Very young kids look in the mirror and discover themselves as independent unique individuals. With the masks they have a harder time doing that and that can depersonalize them and make them feel more submissive or controlled.

Not here to debate about masks but if we had preschool age kids think I would try to find or do something for them that's different vs the status quo at least where we live in SoCal.
Yeah, but if we don't mask them they could kill adults.

We rely on facial clues, including moving lips, for socialization, comprehension and development. Smiles are healthy, both to the giver and the recipient. Now they're irrelevant in schools, among other places.
 
You may be right to some extent, but that doesn't make it right to put these burdens on kids because they can't fight back. It's abuse of kids and its abuse of power. I just can't rationalize it like you do. I'm kind of meh with many of the adult mandates, but when you lose your job because you won't subject yourself to medical treatment that the government has decided is the preferred treatment despite the fact there are alternatives that may actually be superior. That is incredibly troubling.
Pro-vaxxers are hoping theyʻll be cured of their Silver Bullet Symdrome.
 
Australia still unable to contain the Delta (despite having come out of winter)....


It's also increasingly appearing New Zealand has failed in containment.....


Dad4's favorite high masked high vaxxed singapore continues to show an increase


Heavily vaxxed iceland has also been unable to contain...


And for the record here's how test and trace South Korea continues to do.....


It's beginning to look like the only country that will have managed to near completely escape covid is Taiwan.
 
Yeah, but if we don't mask them they could kill adults.

We rely on facial clues, including moving lips, for socialization, comprehension and development. Smiles are healthy, both to the giver and the recipient. Now they're irrelevant in schools, among other places.
The AAPs recommendation to mask children age 2 and up is lunacy and detoriates the crediblity of any type of covid guidance given by them. The EUCDC's masking policy for children is polar opposite of what the US recommendations are.
 
Another one.....



We have enough vaccine choices (even without the AZ approval in the US) for a reasonable vaccine policy:

-Moderna for the near old and old....it seems to be more robust anyways
-Pfizer for the middle aged and near old
-J&J or 1 dose Pfizer for young men
-Pfizer for young women

Interestingly a lot of this is probably tied not just to the mechanism (mRNA v. traditional) but also to the dosage amounts (J&J being just one, Moderna being more potent).
 
A better description is that adults, right and left, have successfully opposed most adult mandates.

And, when there is a mandate on adults, they complain LOUDLY. The mandate gets weakened or repealed and the kid mandate is what remains.
"...but Singapore" (if my memory serves me right)


singapore-covid-chart-2.jpgsingapore-covid-chart.jpg
 
Something is screwy: the New York Times has been sensible twice in a single week.

Now writer David Leonhardt is pointing out what a lot of us have been saying pretty much the whole time: (1) predictions of doom based on people's so-called "bad behavior" often turn out to be embarrassingly off the mark, and (2) the "moralistic fable" behind COVID (whereby good and virtuous behavior makes the numbers go down and "reckless" behavior does the opposite) is unhelpful.

"The fable we tell ourselves," writes Leonhardt, "is that our day-to-day behavior dictates the course of the pandemic. When we are good — by staying socially distant and wearing our masks — cases are supposed to fall. When we are bad — by eating in restaurants, hanging out with friends and going to a theater or football game — cases are supposed to rise."

With school resuming and large crowds, often unmasked, assembling for all kinds of events, we heard plenty of stern warnings at the beginning of last month. Leonhardt cites Politico's headline "It May Only Get Worse." "The new school year is already a disaster," said Business Insider.

And then what happened?

Everything plummeted: cases, hospitalizations, deaths.

As I've said repeatedly over the past year and a half, I've just wanted to hear the so-called experts say, at least once in a while, "We don't know. We don't fully understand what's going on here."

But that's not as fun as lording it over the public with a false certainty.

Michael Osterholm, the former Biden COVID adviser who occasionally has something sensible to say, displayed the kind of humility I've been waiting for when he told Leonhardt: "We still are really in the cave ages in terms of understanding how viruses emerge, how they spread, how they start and stop, why they do what they do."

What a refreshing change from "Shut up and listen to the science."

A little late, though. Some of us have been treated not too kindly for saying these very things.

Now, as people begin to weary of it all, people like Leonhardt suddenly have the courage to say something.

But better late than never. I'm not a sore winner.—Tommie Wood
 
Back
Top