Trans eligibility rules for girls sports.
- Thread starter dad4
- Start date
You said "government".
Yep... he paid her. She just can't remember the year or any details about it.
Nope. Gavin Newsom is a lying, hypocritical piece of shit. A lot like Biden. I imagine you voted for both.
Ha ha. Soon your master will be in prison and you’ll be sucking up to Ron DeSantis, who can’t even win a fight against Mickey Mouse.
You often reply to people without remembering to hit "reply" so nobody knows who you're talking to.
We've learned to accept your handicap. Does that mean you can sue yourself?
Ha ha. I’m gonna make today’s fetal stem cell smoothie extra frothy, raise my glass and give a toast to Jack Smith!
DeSantis kicked Disney's ass. I guess you haven't been following news with all your "Kevin would rather play against the girls, coach."
How many times do I need to post it? You losers have been putting Trump in jail since 2015. Any day now, eh libtard?
Happened again
SILVER ELITE
oh geez..really...this is your response.. move along ,no nazis to see here, right in front of the whole world?
Happened again
SILVER ELITE
have you figured out what those are yet?
You mean like all of our “militias”, including the oath keepers and proud boys? Although the main difference between the nazi ukrainian militias and our nazi militias is that ours would probably use a foreign invasion as an opportunity to shoot black people and hang Mike Pence instead of at least defending their own fucking country.
fourteenknots
BRONZE
I’m with you my brother. Who can trust a guy who spent time prosecuting European war criminals? There’s been a long line of such nefarious characters in our history. Back in ‘45, this cretin’s forelawyers went all in to unfairly go after a few guys that were subjects of witch hunts too. And there were certainly some good people among those they brought to so-called “trial”.
Yeah... wealthy, Ivy League graduate, hot wife and Commander In Chief. He's a real fuckup compared to you, bitchboy.
I'll bet he doesn't even have multiple profiles on SoCal Soccer Forum.
Would you consider "RuPaul's Drag Race" an official militia?
P.S. - The only ones shooting black people are other black people. Look it up.
Jack Smith lost a court case?
Your orange master lost all 63 of his to overturn the election. Lost $5 million because he sexually assaulted Jean Carroll. Lost his criminal tax fraud trial. His entire family lost their court case over his misuse of charitable funds and is barred for life from operating a charity in NY. Oh, and he lost his case trying to block disclosure of his records, and the supreme clurt told him to fuck off.
There has never in history been a bigger court loser than your donny. Bigly.
And their President and Prime Minister are still both Jewish, right in front of the whole world.
Show her the money! Maybe he should not have admitted how he grabs women by the pussy. Ha ha.
kickingandscreaming
PREMIER
From Leighton Woodhouse of Public News
Pride Month is upon us. Once upon a time, that meant celebrating the struggle of an oppressed minority group whose civil rights the government was arbitrarily violating. Then, eight years ago, the Supreme Court upheld marriage equality, and gays and lesbians became legally equal — a momentous advance for American democracy.
So what does Pride Month stand for now that equality of sexual orientation has been achieved? The obvious answer is that it stands for the ongoing struggle for the equality of trans people, whose rights have yet to be won.
But that answer only begs the question. What exactly are these unfulfilled rights? Trans people are already legally equal. It’s against the law to discriminate against trans people in employment, housing, marriage, or anything else other people are entitled to.
So what is it, precisely, that the LGBTQIA2S+ movement is fighting for?
Judging by its rhetoric, that movement today demands much more than equal rights for people who identify as transgender — rights they already possess. It insists on privileges that other groups don’t necessarily enjoy. These are, in fact, not “rights” at all but demands on other people. They include the demand that everyone else adjust their everyday speech to adopt new words and grammar, sometimes on pain of material penalties, like job loss or fines. They include changes to long-standing rules governing public spaces — changes that infringe on what were hitherto perceived as the rights, sometimes hard-won, of women. And they include forfeiting profound parental authority and responsibilities over our own children.
No other civil rights movement has ever even asked for changes such as these, let alone won them. And there’s a reason for that: they are not the entitlements of a democratic society. They are the opposite.
Naturally, many people are resistant to these demands. Even people who are open to being persuaded, as they were over gay marriage, are resentful at being told not just how to act but what to believe. In a normal democratic context, we would bargain over these competing prerogatives through the prosaic mechanisms of elections and legislation. But today’s LGBT movement has ceased relying on persuasion as the means to achieve its goals, as it so brilliantly did in the fight for marriage equality. It has replaced persuasion with moral bullying.
The LGBT movement today makes demands, and you’re called upon to comply. If you don’t, you’re called a bigot, loudly and publicly. It’s really as crude and simple as that. Anyone who doesn’t enthusiastically comply with whatever the movement demands at any given moment, we’re told, must be motivated by hate. Social ostracism is the just dessert for these moral heretics.
Like most blunt instruments of authoritarianism, to a point, it works. People tend to obey, if only out of fear.
But there will always be those who refuse to bend the knee, and when activists smear them publicly as bigots, extremists and MAGA white supremacists, they fight back harder. That’s what’s happening in places like Glendale, California, and Montgomery County, Maryland. People are questioning the demands of this movement, particularly when it comes to their children. And they’re being met with force. Those clashes are now erupting in violence.
There was a time when one would have expected politicians to play a de-escalatory role when these conflicts broke out, especially when the vying camps were among their own constituents. But today, political leaders are instead rushing to take sides.
The change represents an erosion that has occurred in American politics. Politicians now govern through division because conflict yields political dividends that consensus does not. Moral grandstanding has become a new status marker for the educated and affluent, supplanting luxury European cars and Stanford alumni bumper stickers. Thirsty to appeal to these high-propensity voters of the donor class, elected officials, most of whom belong to the same social tier themselves, pander to their sensibilities. Thus, instead of acting to reconcile these ruptures, they pounce on them, eager to showcase their leadership of the moral elite.
The politicians, the NGOs, the activists, the corporations, the media — the incentives align for all of them to stoke these flames and amass the moral capital that comes with being perceived as being on the right side. With this grandstanding comes votes, donations, brand loyalty, and subscriptions. Social conflict, like war, is big business.
So that’s what Pride Month means today: endless Culture War. Don’t mistake it for what it once was. The moral posturing, the victimization, the radical chic — it’s all part of the marketing.
—LW
Pride Month is upon us. Once upon a time, that meant celebrating the struggle of an oppressed minority group whose civil rights the government was arbitrarily violating. Then, eight years ago, the Supreme Court upheld marriage equality, and gays and lesbians became legally equal — a momentous advance for American democracy.
So what does Pride Month stand for now that equality of sexual orientation has been achieved? The obvious answer is that it stands for the ongoing struggle for the equality of trans people, whose rights have yet to be won.
But that answer only begs the question. What exactly are these unfulfilled rights? Trans people are already legally equal. It’s against the law to discriminate against trans people in employment, housing, marriage, or anything else other people are entitled to.
So what is it, precisely, that the LGBTQIA2S+ movement is fighting for?
Judging by its rhetoric, that movement today demands much more than equal rights for people who identify as transgender — rights they already possess. It insists on privileges that other groups don’t necessarily enjoy. These are, in fact, not “rights” at all but demands on other people. They include the demand that everyone else adjust their everyday speech to adopt new words and grammar, sometimes on pain of material penalties, like job loss or fines. They include changes to long-standing rules governing public spaces — changes that infringe on what were hitherto perceived as the rights, sometimes hard-won, of women. And they include forfeiting profound parental authority and responsibilities over our own children.
No other civil rights movement has ever even asked for changes such as these, let alone won them. And there’s a reason for that: they are not the entitlements of a democratic society. They are the opposite.
Naturally, many people are resistant to these demands. Even people who are open to being persuaded, as they were over gay marriage, are resentful at being told not just how to act but what to believe. In a normal democratic context, we would bargain over these competing prerogatives through the prosaic mechanisms of elections and legislation. But today’s LGBT movement has ceased relying on persuasion as the means to achieve its goals, as it so brilliantly did in the fight for marriage equality. It has replaced persuasion with moral bullying.
The LGBT movement today makes demands, and you’re called upon to comply. If you don’t, you’re called a bigot, loudly and publicly. It’s really as crude and simple as that. Anyone who doesn’t enthusiastically comply with whatever the movement demands at any given moment, we’re told, must be motivated by hate. Social ostracism is the just dessert for these moral heretics.
Like most blunt instruments of authoritarianism, to a point, it works. People tend to obey, if only out of fear.
But there will always be those who refuse to bend the knee, and when activists smear them publicly as bigots, extremists and MAGA white supremacists, they fight back harder. That’s what’s happening in places like Glendale, California, and Montgomery County, Maryland. People are questioning the demands of this movement, particularly when it comes to their children. And they’re being met with force. Those clashes are now erupting in violence.
There was a time when one would have expected politicians to play a de-escalatory role when these conflicts broke out, especially when the vying camps were among their own constituents. But today, political leaders are instead rushing to take sides.
The change represents an erosion that has occurred in American politics. Politicians now govern through division because conflict yields political dividends that consensus does not. Moral grandstanding has become a new status marker for the educated and affluent, supplanting luxury European cars and Stanford alumni bumper stickers. Thirsty to appeal to these high-propensity voters of the donor class, elected officials, most of whom belong to the same social tier themselves, pander to their sensibilities. Thus, instead of acting to reconcile these ruptures, they pounce on them, eager to showcase their leadership of the moral elite.
The politicians, the NGOs, the activists, the corporations, the media — the incentives align for all of them to stoke these flames and amass the moral capital that comes with being perceived as being on the right side. With this grandstanding comes votes, donations, brand loyalty, and subscriptions. Social conflict, like war, is big business.
So that’s what Pride Month means today: endless Culture War. Don’t mistake it for what it once was. The moral posturing, the victimization, the radical chic — it’s all part of the marketing.
—LW
[
Sounds like you and Trump should get a room, except Trump wants nothing to do with you other than to part you from your paltry savings. So how much are you loving your trump digital trading cards?
Sounds like you and Trump should get a room, except Trump wants nothing to do with you other than to part you from your paltry savings. So how much are you loving your trump digital trading cards?
A bigoty manifesto! Awesome! Now that Pat Robertson is dead, I guess someone had to pick up the torch.