Trans eligibility rules for girls sports.

To be fair, the poster he's talking to isnt known for wanting to have good faith discussions either.
No doubt and I've never pulled any punches with this woke cliché of a poster. It's good for a chuckle when someone is completely blind to the hypocrisy of fighting hate with hate.
 
Virtually none of the worst mass shooters were legally prohibited from having guns dumb shit. You want them to have guns until they’ve already blown away the elementary school. And you want those who aren’t legally allowed to have easy access to obtain them illegally.

BTW, it is easier for cops to do their jobs when they don’t have to worry about AR-15s. Just ask the coward little piggie cops in Uvalde. How about the Sandy Hook coppers who waited six minutes, and five minutes after the last shot was fired, to enter the school. How about the Orlando PD, about 100 of whom sat around and did nothing for hours while that mass shooter killed 49 people?

Yeah, the cops are doing fine work with these mass shootings and really loving all the AR-15s out there. The cops must be real pussies given how you all think AR-15s are no more dangerous than handguns.

Listen, retard, you aren't making guns go away. There are approximately 70 million guns on the street right now. And let's not pretend you're a real man. Calling cops "piggies" just shows what a fucking pussy you really are. You wouldn't put that bullseye on your chest for an hour. You'd put a dick in your ass for an hour but by all accounts you're nothing but an ambulance chasing drag queen lover.
 
No doubt and I've never pulled any punches with this woke cliché of a poster. It's good for a chuckle when someone is completely blind to the hypocrisy of fighting hate with hate.
Theres no way someone can be so arrogant in the face of his own hypocrisy. He has to be a troll.
 
Theres no way someone can be so arrogant in the face of his own hypocrisy. He has to be a troll.
That's crossed my mind a number of times, but you'd be surprised. He could just be yanking our chain, in which case he has done a masterful job.

On another note, what purpose does an assault rifle serve a civilian other than it might be fun to shoot?
 
To be fair, the poster he's talking to isnt known for wanting to have good faith discussions either.
To be fair, I'm not talking about the LBG Pride community. Like I said a few times before, some of my best friends are Lesbian, Gay and Bi. As Red told Andy in Shawshank Redemption,
Andy Dufresne: I don't suppose it would help if I told them that I'm not homosexual.
Red: Neither are they. You have to be human first.
My beef is with the dudes like Bogs, Rooster and that other crazy prisoner that shared a cell with Tommy, Blatch. Poor Tommy. It's the Male Trans Wolf (MTW) in woman's clothing, who prey on little kids that tells 99% that prison is the only place for them. No parole, sorry. Big difference, moo.

Bogs & Rooster

1685659773843.png

Blatch
1685659837603.png

 
This has got to be in the running for dumbest post of the year.

Have fun throwing a tantrum because guns including your worst nightmare, the ar15, are never going anywhere. Fucking Karen.

Actually, the Karens are the ones whining about needing AR-15s because they’re terrified black person, and now apparently trans children, might walk in front of their house. Remember the McCloskeys?
 
That's crossed my mind a number of times, but you'd be surprised. He could just be yanking our chain, in which case he has done a masterful job.

On another note, what purpose does an assault rifle serve a civilian other than it might be fun to shoot?
If by assault rifle you mean an ar then my opinion, same as any other gun, self defense and hunting.
 
Actually, the Karens are the ones whining about needing AR-15s because they’re terrified black person, and now apparently trans children, might walk in front of their house. Remember the McCloskeys?

Black person? You mean "people"?

I remember the McCloskeys. The spent months watching BLM rioters harass innocent people, burn cars, burn businesses, murder a black police officer and black security guard, and decided to protect their home when a bunch of rioters breached their gated neighborhood.

I guess you think that's okay, though, right? Is that what 'protestors' do... breach private property? Or was January 6th an anomaly?
 
I guess that is one way to rationalize your belief that all these dead school children is the price of freedom, although the reality is all this unnecessary killing is not freedom at all.

How come all these dead school children don't bother you when it happens on a daily basis across this country? Handguns, knives, drugs, DUIs, parental abuse, etc. Lots of reasons why children die.

Is there nobody you can get billable hours from in those cases?
 
BTW, DeSantis can’t stop Disney, and now he can’t stop State Farm. But, hey, he’s done a bang up job pretending slavery never happened and banning poems by Amanda Gorman.


Disney is bleeding employees out their asshole. So yeah, he's putting the hurt on Disney.

State Farm pandered years ago... or did you think Jake when from a fat white guy to a muscular black one because the James Bond series needed a new lead?
 
I love how the republican platform has essentially been reduced to:

1. banning maybe 100 trans children in the US from playing kiddie sports;
2. killing as many children as it takes cuz that’s the price of freedom; and
3. trying to get Prince Harry kicked out of the US for doing dar less cocaine than Matt Gaetz.

 
If by assault rifle you mean an ar then my opinion, same as any other gun, self defense and hunting.
Aren't there other weapons that are better served for those purposes? I could be wrong, but I believe that it wasn't designed for those purposes, albeit some do use it in that manner. Apparently the main advantage of an AR-15 is that it is semi-automatic, so is it popular for hunting for those less skilled that can't take down an animal in one shot?

I don't know if an AR/AW ban would be effective, but it seems its primary and most effective purpose is for mass killing of humans (or a herd of jack rabbits which would be wanton waste). It certainly has proven its ability to be effective in mass killings, although in terms of total killings a handgun is probably leading.

To me there is a balancing act, a ban on AR/AW sales may, or may not be effective, but by the same token it wouldn't limit someone's ability to effectively hunt or protect themselves.
 
Aren't there other weapons that are better served for those purposes? I could be wrong, but I believe that it wasn't designed for those purposes, albeit some do use it in that manner. Apparently the main advantage of an AR-15 is that it is semi-automatic, so is it popular for hunting for those less skilled that can't take down an animal in one shot?

I don't know if an AR/AW ban would be effective, but it seems its primary and most effective purpose is for mass killing of humans (or a herd of jack rabbits which would be wanton waste). It certainly has proven its ability to be effective in mass killings, although in terms of total killings a handgun is probably leading.

To me there is a balancing act, a ban on AR/AW sales may, or may not be effective, but by the same token it wouldn't limit someone's ability to effectively hunt or protect themselves.
You're correct it was designed to be a lightweight, higher capacity weapon to the m1 garand, difference is the semi auto. Most hunting weapons are semi auto, see the ruger mini 14. Same weapon as an ar, just looks like a "hunting rifle" so nobody says a word, but they would want to ban the hi point 380 carbine, makes zero sense.
The main problem I see is that handguns are far and away the leading cause of gun violence in this country and everyone is focused on the "assault rifle". I said earlier if anyone wants to start with a ban, they shouldn't be taken seriously because A. They're worried about the 1% instead of the 99% B. It does nothing to address the root cause of these shootings and C. Like our friend sur has shown us, it doesnt stop there but will soon include all guns.
The DOJ has already said they dont know if the assault weapon worked or didnt so anyone spouting that it did is gravely mistaken.
I personally believe everyone has a right to defend themselves and their family and at this point there are so many "assault weapons" it has to be considered that citizens should be able to defend themselves against them, odd as that sounds. I have and have owned several ar's and it's not my go to for self defense in fact it just sits in the safe, but who am I to tell anyone what they can and cannot do for their family.
 
Back
Top