Is that a "no"?The question for Israel is not whether the recent immigrants should go back, but whether the long-term residents can stay.
Is that a "no"?The question for Israel is not whether the recent immigrants should go back, but whether the long-term residents can stay.
Do you think everyone should just go back to where their ancestors came from?
Israel is one of our closest allies, do some research. You're trying to Bullshit your History.
France and Britain are " Supposed " to be Very close Allies, but lately it seems they throw
America under the bus for their own financial gain.....
As for the land of " Israel " it's always been Israel and not created. Nor did the United States
" create " Israel after WWI, it was inhabited by Arabs at the time....The area you refer to
as the State of Palestine is Wrong....It's a region not a State, the people who claim they
are Palestinian are Arabic and they are who sparsly populated the region. The British created
Palestine and the temporary monetary system until they were pressured to return the
region to the rightful inhabitants of the land Called Israel....Revisionist History is what
you are peddling and it's disingenuous at the very least.....
The long term history of the area Israelite's inhabited is in ALL
the History books and it describes how the Romans destroyed the
inhabitants and relabeled the region, yet they persevered and reclaimed the land many times....
Do you research before peddling Fake History....
Reading comprehension once again?At least this time you were close?
On May 14, 1948, David Ben-Gurion, the head of the Jewish Agency, proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel. U.S. President Harry S. Truman recognized the new nation on the same day.
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/creation-israel
Apparently the United Nations deemed the partition to be fair.Why would Palestine accept a deal that partitions their country (that they have lived in for over a thousand years) and gives them the equivalent of a county. The holocaust was one of the biggest tragedies in history but seizing the country of Palestine was a tragedy too.
WWII...created after WWII by the United Nations - 1947
The United Nations proposed separate Palestinian & Jewish states.
The Palestinians declined, the Jews having just been through the halocaust, accepted.
Sounds like California, doesn't it? Maybe we need to hire the Israelis to take care of things.Why would the Palestinians agree to give away control of half of their country to an immigrant minority?
They didn't.Why would the Palestinians agree to give away control of half of their country to an immigrant minority?
They didn't.
As soon as the Israeli's declared independence, the Palestinians, Egyptians, & Jordanians attacked Israel & fought the 1948 Arab - Israeli War.
As I stated above, Israel has won all the major battles since and has signed peace agreements with Egypt & Jordan.
Perhaps it's time for the Palestinians to do the same...?
Since everyone is from Africa that is a moot question.
That's what they did.I was referring to what you said -- "The Palestinians declined".
Why would the Palestinians agree to give away control of half of their country to an immigrant minority?
That's what they did.
I agree.Any rational people would.
I agree.
After seventy years of fighting and losing, one would think rational people would sue for peace...
Magoo..you seem confused. I didn't lose anything.That would make you a loser.
Modern Humans Came Out of Africa, "Definitive" Study Says
James Owen
for National Geographic News
July 18, 2007
We are solely children of Africa—with no Neandertals or island-dwelling "hobbits" in our family tree, according to a new study.
Scientists who compared the skulls and DNA of human remains from around the world say their results point to modern humans (Homo sapiens) having a single origin in Africa.
The study didn't find any evidence to suggest that human species living elsewhere in the world contributed to our direct ancestors' make-up.
A team led by Andrea Manica at the University of Cambridge, England, combined analysis of global genetic variations with comparisons of more than 6,000 skulls from more than a hundred ancient human populations.
The team found that loss of genetic diversity was very closely mirrored by reduced physical variation the farther away people lived from Africa. (Explore our human roots.)
entire article:
https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/07/070718-african-origin.html
Its a question that is pertinent to the topic.Since everyone is from Africa that is a moot question.
Booty?https://medium.com/@johnhawks/the-s...rigins-just-got-more-complicated-9e435bea24f6
I'm not buying the " One " source development premise...
Too many diverse aspects of Humans goes way back past the
3 - 400,000 year + data....
I suspect several distinct groups developed independent of
each other .....There's just no other way to describe having
so many diverse intellectual groups of Humans on this planet...
Most of the ancestral traits are based on the " One " source premise.
The last two or so years discoveries has cast serious doubt on those
previous " One " source origins....
Furthermore, who's to say any of us are native of this planet.....
No ones rewound time to observe the true origins of Humans
on this planet....
The possibilities of life forms just like us are endless in the Cosmos.
Just my Opinion.....