The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

OCTOBER 9, 2018
Trump and America
By Kevin Cee
The results of the 2016 presidential election sent a shock wave throughout the United States and around the world. Contrary to the expectations of many, if not most, Donald Trump won the election.

His opponents were stunned. They had already crowned their candidate as the winner. The party had already been planned and prepared. There was no possibility that Hillary Clinton could lose.

However, after a short period, Trump's opponents recovered. They would fight back. They simply could not tolerate this frightening – to them – specter who had promised Americans that he would build a wall to protect their country and that he would "drain the swamp" in Washington. They could not accept as president anyone who does not share their ideology and their plans for the United States.

His enemies, who had plotted during the presidential campaign to ensure that Hillary Clinton would be elected, immediately began to make their plans to undo the horrible and unthinkable mistake made by the voters of the United States. They decided that they would muffle and nullify the voice of the people by removing the president from office. They would impeach him.

207298_5_.png
And so, aided and abetted by the media and by high-ranking members of the government itself, they initiated their war. They would do whatever they had to do by whatever means they could imagine to damage and to destroy the president, his administration, his friends, and his supporters. It was a civil war, ferocious, with no holds barred and no sense of decency or honor. It would be pervasive and relentless. Nothing was sacred against their onslaught, not even the Constitution, not even the rule of law, not even the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, not even the right of others to believe anything other than what they believed.

Proof of the commitment of President Trump's enemies to weaken and overthrow him, a person duly elected by America's voters, assails us every day. The media fill newspapers, magazines, daily newscasts, and internet postings with negative stories. Whether they're true or untrue is not important. Reporters are no longer reporters. They have become judges who see their role as accepting negative opinions from the president's enemies and correcting the unacceptable opinions of the few supporters who occasionally have an opportunity to speak.

One representative example, among the countless possibilities, of the ruthlessness of President Trump's enemies is the recent public spectacle of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Poor, "terrified" Christine Blasey Ford! In spite of her protestation to the contrary, Ford was a pathetic pawn placed on the sacrificial altar by the pitiless Democratic members of the committee in their dogged and reprehensible destruction of anyone who might be an obstacle in the attainment of their sacred goals.

In spite of this constant stream of attacks, President Trump has been remarkably successful in the short period of time he has been the president. Most of his successes are not reported in the mainstream media, and, if it is begrudgingly reported, the news is almost always accompanied by a caveat that any credit really belongs to his predecessor, that the news is really bad, or that the administration is not telling the truth.
 
Look at how proud the girls are of their dad and husband, you people.should be ashamed of yourselves.
Lying, cheating whores that you are.

download (8).jpeg
 
OCTOBER 10, 2018
Trump, Declassification, and Leverage
By Mark Wauck
There's a reason why President Trump has not unilaterally declassified the documents exposing perfidy against him: leverage. As the whole Russia hoax is beginning to come into some sort of global perspective – quite literally, as we'll see – the extent of the advantage he now maintains by holding back declassification as a threat outweighs the benefits of transparency. Recent posts by observers who write from widely varying perspectives give us the ability to discern the current state of play.

Let's start with the domestic front of the Russia hoax. Sundance at Conservative Tree House has an excellent post up: "President Trump and DAG Rod Rosenstein – "No Collusion", No Immediate Worries..." The overall theme is one that's dear to Sundance's heart: leverage. The state of play is this: the congressional investigation has progressed to the point that it's clear beyond cavil that the entire Russia narrative is, in fact, a hoax and fraud – both on the American people in general and on our legal system. This is to say real criminal liability exists for the key players who developed the plot against Trump. John Solomon summarizes what Congress has discovered in succinct fashion:

There is now a concrete storyline backed by irrefutable evidence: The FBI allowed itself to take political opposition research created by one party to defeat another in an election, treated it like actionable intelligence, presented it to the court as substantiated, and then used it to justify spying on an adviser for the campaign of that party's duly chosen nominee for president in the final days of a presidential election.

And when, nine months later, the FBI could not prove the allegation of collusion between Trump and Russia, unverified evidence was leaked to the media to try to sustain public support for a continued investigation.

But Sundance spells out very specifically where the greatest risk – and therefore the greatest leverage – lies:

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein created the special counsel under fraudulent pretense. That origination material (Ohr 302's, FISA pages, origination EC, and Page/Strzok messages) is now a risk to the Deputy AG.

There are many other players, in addition to Rosenstein, who are at serious risk. But from the perspective of leverage, Rosenstein is the key because he created the special counsel part of the hoax and because – as a result of A.G. Sessions's recusal – he remains in charge of the special counsel operation. Rosenstein can exercise as much or as little control over Mueller as he wants. Trump's threat of declassification of the "origination material" gives Trump complete leverage over Rosenstein and therefore over Mueller.

Trump's leverage ensures that Rosenstein will very much want to restrain Mueller. If Rosenstein wants to restrain Mueller, Mueller will be restrained. This may explain why we are now seeing key members of Mueller's team leaving and returning to their old jobs. The importance of this is that Mueller has posed the greatest threat to the Trump administration, the greatest annoyance. That threat is now defanged for the immediate future. If Mueller steps out of line, boom! Declassification. By putting declassification on hold, Trump maintains his leverage. And Congress continues to investigate and slowly reveal the truth.
 
So apparently the sexual assaulter in chief is now claiming there is a war on men? He wants men to have the right to assault whomever they want I guess. Seems we are going back to Biblical times where women are traded for and treated like livestock . . . just what you nutters want, cuz you fear women as well.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
So apparently the sexual assaulter in chief is now claiming there is a war on men? He wants men to have the right to assault whomever they want I guess. Seems we are going back to Biblical times where women are traded for and treated like livestock . . . just what you nutters want, cuz you fear women as well.
Click to expand...
We should go back to biblical times.
 
First lady Melania Trump says women who make accusations of sexual abuse "need to be heard" and supported, but so do men.

She says when there are accusations there needs to be "really hard evidence" and accusers should "show the evidence."

6e0e8fffd98c4c5a99e8e52e90739d0d.jpg
 
Sheriff Joe said:
October surprise.

Exclusive: Kevin McCarthy Introducing Bill to Fully Fund Border Wall
https://www.breitbart.com/big-gover...d-border-wall-midterm-immigration-referendum/
Midterms Become Immigration Referendum

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy will introduce a bill this week that will fully fund President Donald Trump’s planned wall along the U.S. border with Mexico, thereby setting the midterm elections up as a referendum on immigration policy, Breitbart News has learned exclusively
Click to expand...

better-call-saul-episode-205-howard-fabian-interview-1200x707.jpg
 
Hüsker Dü said:
First lady Melania Trump says women who make accusations of sexual abuse "need to be heard" and supported, but so do men.

She says when there are accusations there needs to be "really hard evidence" and accusers should "show the evidence."

6e0e8fffd98c4c5a99e8e52e90739d0d.jpg
Click to expand...
The rest of the story,
Melania Trump On Me Too: We Should Support Men, ‘Not Just Women’
In 2016, she defended Donald Trump against serial sexual misconduct allegations by suggesting people should “check the background of these women.”

By Marina Fang
5bbdeeb0220000bb01dd9a54.jpeg

Carlo Allegri / Reuters
First lady Melania Trump in Cairo, Egypt, on Saturday.



First lady Melania Trump says she supports the Me Too movement but that accusers need “hard evidence” to back their claims, arguing “we need to support” accused men as well.

“I support the women, and they need to be heard,” Trump said in an ABC News interview taped last week during her trip to Africa. “We need to support them, and you know, also men, not just women.”

WATCH: One-on-one with First Lady @MelaniaTrump. She’s opening up for the first time about her life and her time in the White House to @TomLlamasABC.

“Being Melania - The First Lady” airs THIS Friday at 10|9c on @ABC: https://t.co/BFuO7gPBkP pic.twitter.com/MqXC5NuVMn

— Good Morning America (@GMA) October 10, 2018
When asked if accused men have received unfair treatment, the first lady said there should be proof to support the accusations. She also echoed her husband’s criticism of the media.

“I do stand with women, but we need to show the evidence,” Trump said. “You cannot just say to somebody, ‘I was sexually assaulted,’ or, ‘You did that to me,’ because sometimes the media goes too far. The way they portray some stories, it’s not correct. It’s not right.”

Reporters typically follow extensive protocols to corroborate misconduct claims before publishing them. Many survivors do not report sexual assault for a variety of reasons, including fear of retaliation, embarrassment or a lack of security. Sometimes, evidence is not readily available.

Trump stood by her husband when he was accused of sexual misconduct during his presidential campaign and dismissed the “Access Hollywood” tape of him bragging about sexual assault as “boy talk.”

In a 2016 interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper, she claimed her husband’s accusers were “organized from the opposition” and suggested that people “check the background of these women.”

President Donald Trump has repeatedly insinuated that many women saying they were sexually assaulted, including those making such allegations against him, are lying.

During his campaign, he mocked his accusers by suggesting they were not attractive enough to be sexually assaulted.

“Look at her, I don’t think so,” he said of People magazine reporter Natasha Stoynoff, who said Trump attacked her in 2005. “Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you,” he said of another woman, without naming her.

At a campaign rally last week, the president undermined Christine Blasey Ford by mocking her testimony that now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were in high school.

On Friday, the president also claimed without evidence that sexual assault survivors who demonstrated against Kavanaugh’s nomination on Capitol Hill were paid protesters.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
So apparently the sexual assaulter in chief is now claiming there is a war on men? He wants men to have the right to assault whomever they want I guess. Seems we are going back to Biblical times where women are traded for and treated like livestock . . . just what you nutters want, cuz you fear women as well.
Click to expand...

Busy erasing all doubt....great bit of wisdom and deductive thinking goin' on there.....geesssuss
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top