You know who told the TRUTH today...
That won't make you sway.....
But you don't give a fuck....
Cause yur just an old cuck.....
Let's ask you instead..Magoo, how many drinks did you have at lunch today?
No, can't say I have.I bought a 12-pack of Budweiser in aluminum bottles so I can pour half into a frozen glass and the reseal the bottle. So the answer is one 8-oz Bud.
Have you? (ever blacked out from drinking?)
No, can't say I have.
But I've been hammered more than once...enough about me
Not a single witness backed up Dr. Ford.
Not one piece of evidence.
Shame on the Democrats.
Look at the facts Magoo, they matter more than your hate for Trump...you're pathetic.We should know more tomorrow after the other witnesses testify, some of them friends of Dr. Ford and some of them friends of Judge Kavanaugh.
What's that? No more testimony? No more investigations? Because the committee won't allow it?
Shame on the Republicans.
E is delusional. Period. He has proven he believes hearsay over reason. He must have sustained more then a bump on his head by his assailant.
No, can't say I have.
But I've been hammered more than once...enough about me
Not a single witness backed up Dr. Ford.
Not one piece of evidence.
Shame on the Democrats.
He must have sustained more then a bump on his head by his assailant.
Hanapaa!Do tell.
No wonder she lost.
I'm going to go out on a limb and decide that you haven't been to law school since you don't know the meaning of "hearsay". This was sworn testimony under risk of prosecution for perjury. (Heck, even a good education in English would have covered that). The fact that the two sides gave contradictory testimony is not unusual - that's why we have juries - to decide which version of the facts is more believable. As I have pointed out before, there are three levels of "jury" in this case - the committee vote tomorrow (unless something happens overnight), the full Senate vote soon (ditto), and the November election vote (which will happen no matter what the committee and the Senate decide, and for which the die has been pretty much cast today - at least on this topic).
If you want to feel better about Judge k's situation, you might find solace in the fact that he helped overrule a jury verdict soon after he became part of the DC Circuit Court. The jury had decided that a cop lied about killing a man in self-defense and awarded his family some money.
Bring it on Spartacus
So we got an 8 of 16 oz. testimony today.I bought a 12-pack of Budweiser in aluminum bottles so I can pour half into a frozen glass and the reseal the bottle. So the answer is one 8-oz Bud.
Have you? (ever blacked out from drinking?)
Everybody knows that old white guys can only handle 8 of 16 0zs.Nobody asked the obvious question that was on the tip of my tongue --
"Your Honor, how many drinks did you have at lunch today?"
Everybody knows that old white guys can only handle 8 of 16 0zs.
He's a fascist, what do you expect?Look at the facts Magoo, they matter more than your hate for Trump...you're pathetic.
There is no evidence of a crime other than what Ford claimed happened.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Christine Blasey Ford has claimed that four other people attended a small gathering at which she was allegedly assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh. Three of those people, PJ Smyth, Mark Judge, and Kavanaugh, have already denied any recollection of attending such a party.
On Saturday night, Leland Ingham Keyser, a classmate of Ford's at the all-girls school Holton-Arms and her final named witness, denied any recollection of attending a party with Brett Kavanaugh.
"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," lawyer Howard J. Walsh said in a statement sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
CNN reports that " Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford's."
Keyser previously coached golf at Georgetown University and is now executive producer of Bob Beckel's podcast. Keyser is the ex-wife of Beckel, a former Democratic operative and commentator. A search on OpenSecrets.org reveals Keyser's only political donation has been to former Democratic senator Byron Dorgan.
Keyser's denial, as a female lifelong friend and Ford's last named witness, is the most consequential development that has occurred since Ford publicly stepped forward last Sunday and detailed her allegations to the Washington Post. Ford's allegation of the 1982 incident was told to no one until a 2012 therapy session, when Kavanaugh was first touted in the media as the most likely GOP Supreme Court nominee.
All of Ford's named witnesses of the party, both male and female, have now denied any recollection of attending such a party.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john...ss-denies-ever-attending-party-with-kavanaugh
I find solace in the truth Magoo.
You care not about the truth. The truth is, there is no physical evidence or witnesses that can corroborate what Ford claimed happened.
The four people allegedly at the party, including Dr. Ford’s longtime friend Ms. Keyser, have said they recall no such event. Her buddy said under penalty of felony that she does not know Kavanaugh and does not believe she ever saw him at a party, ever.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Senate Judiciary Committee has allowed a reopening of Brett Kavanaugh‘s Supreme Court confirmation hearing, with invitations to both him and Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing him of attempted sexual assault. Those on both sides of the aisle are eager to hear what each might say when they are under oath, with potential perjury charges looming over possible false statements.
As it turns out, Kavanaugh already put himself at risk for possible charges, even if he doesn’t testify next week. According to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the nominee sat down this past Monday with Republican staff for a “transcribed interview,” and Kavanaugh “understood that he was under penalty of felony, if he was not truthful.” That could either mean that Kavanaugh made his statements under oath, or it could refer to the statute prohibiting giving false statements to investigators. Grassley said that Democratic staff was invited, but they declined to participate.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...isk-of-charges-for-statements-on-allegations/
Plenty of people?There are plenty of people who have provided "evidence" in news stories that supports Dr. Ford's position. Is your news source so limited that you haven't heard about those stories?
The Committee refuses to allow those people to testify under oath, or even to allow the FBI to check out those stories. Shame on the Republicans on the Committee.