The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

espola said:
There are plenty of people who have provided "evidence" in news stories that supports Dr. Ford's position. Is your news source so limited that you haven't heard about those stories?

The Committee refuses to allow those people to testify under oath, or even to allow the FBI to check out those stories. Shame on the Republicans on the Committee.
Click to expand...
Wonder how "those stories" got past the FBI. You know? Since those stories are so obvious.

 
espola said:
I'm going to go out on a limb and decide that you haven't been to law school since you don't know the meaning of "hearsay". This was sworn testimony under risk of prosecution for perjury. (Heck, even a good education in English would have covered that). The fact that the two sides gave contradictory testimony is not unusual - that's why we have juries - to decide which version of the facts is more believable. As I have pointed out before, there are three levels of "jury" in this case - the committee vote tomorrow (unless something happens overnight), the full Senate vote soon (ditto), and the November election vote (which will happen no matter what the committee and the Senate decide, and for which the die has been pretty much cast today - at least on this topic).

If you want to feel better about Judge k's situation, you might find solace in the fact that he helped overrule a jury verdict soon after he became part of the DC Circuit Court. The jury had decided that a cop lied about killing a man in self-defense and awarded his family some money.
Click to expand...
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that my refrence to hearsay was about a previous post you have made where you concluded that a story that was told tp you was enough evidence to prove that Russia spies on all foreigners.

I think they may have misread your CT scan. I would ask for another.
 
Multi Sport said:
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that my refrence to hearsay was about a previous post you have made where you concluded that a story that was told tp you was enough evidence to prove that Russia spies on all foreigners.

I think they may have misread your CT scan. I would ask for another.
Click to expand...

You're spinning in the mud and going nowhere.
 
One point that I missed today, but just observed on the replays --

Kavanaugh said that his high school drinking was legal because in Maryland at that time the minimum age for alcohol was 18. Maryland changed that law to 21 effective July 1, 1982. Kavanaugh was born on February 12, 1965. That would make him 17 years, 4 months, and 18 days old when the law changed.

https://one.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/FewerYoungDrivers/appendix.htm

That was sworn testimony, right?
 


BREAKING. Collins, Murkowski, and Donnelly Make Their Decision

Posted at 9:46 pm on September 27, 2018 by streiff


Fireworks-620x406.jpg


My colleague, Sarah Quinlan, just announced that West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has declared he will vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. Now, according to Hill sources, he has company:






If true, that’s it folks. The fat lady just hit the high-C and is riding her chariot off the stage towed by Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer.

hqdefault.jpg


=========
=========
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top