The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

No. You presumed that I meant something that I did not. Both policies do increase prices because of how supply is limited. But youʻre not a big fan of broader discussions. At least I thought you werenʻt until you locked in to the exactness of the magnitudes of tariffs, ex ante, vs. QE, ex post. But make no mistake, both policies increase prices as opposed to reducing prices via non-protectionist policies like QE and tariffs. That is not a 180. Thatʻs just a broader discussion. Lol

I figured it out: you're not a liar. Your recollection just keeps changing...
 
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure I'm able to deem myself king of the world if I want . . . won't do any good, but if it makes you feel better . . .

It can be done....but it won't be done, because of the destruction it will
bring upon our long standing principals....Moral Principals.
Now you will say Trump has no Morals, but you and other Liberals are
wrong......The group at present that lacks any Morals is the Clown
Show run by the Ring leader Robert Mueller and authorized by RR....
This June 5th IG report might not cover his sorry ass, but it will cover all
those who have surrounded him and created the present Criminal
Operation that HE is investigating....His ass is on the BBQ for the
Uranium One Scandal and what he's done to people with
his " Special " Council....
 
Erections have consequences,
SCOTUS Throws Out Case on Illegal Alien Teenager Right to Abortion
500EmailGoogle+Twitter

ultrasound-afp-640x480.jpg

AFP/File FRED DUFOUR
4 Jun 2018Washington, DC20
WASHINGTON, DC – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday unanimously threw out a lower court’s decision that had held that when the U.S. government has a pregnant illegal alien teenager in custody, the government must facilitate the teenager’s obtaining an abortion if she wants one. The nation’s highest court held that the case was moot, and struck the lower court’s decision from the books.
 
Supreme Court Sides with Masterpiece Cakeshop in Same-Sex Wedding Ruling
2522EmailGoogle+Twitter

AP_17293510046223-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/Brennan Linsley
4 Jun 2018274
The Supreme Court granted a narrow victory to people of faith on Monday, holding 7-2 that the Constitution did not allow the Colorado Civil Rights Commission to order Christian baker Jack Phillips to bake a wedding cake for same-sex weddings because a commissioner said Phillips’ Christian beliefs on marriage were “despicable.”


The Court left open for another case the broader question of whether the government can force people of faith to participate in same-sex weddings when the government does not openly show open hostility to their religious beliefs
 
Supreme Court Sides with Masterpiece Cakeshop in Same-Sex Wedding Ruling
2522EmailGoogle+Twitter

AP_17293510046223-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/Brennan Linsley
4 Jun 2018274
The Supreme Court granted a narrow victory to people of faith on Monday, holding 7-2 that the Constitution did not allow the Colorado Civil Rights Commission to order Christian baker Jack Phillips to bake a wedding cake for same-sex weddings because a commissioner said Phillips’ Christian beliefs on marriage were “despicable.”


The Court left open for another case the broader question of whether the government can force people of faith to participate in same-sex weddings when the government does not openly show open hostility to their religious beliefs
Some honey. Imagine that.
 
Supreme Court Sides with Masterpiece Cakeshop in Same-Sex Wedding Ruling
2522EmailGoogle+Twitter

AP_17293510046223-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/Brennan Linsley
4 Jun 2018274
The Supreme Court granted a narrow victory to people of faith on Monday, holding 7-2 that the Constitution did not allow the Colorado Civil Rights Commission to order Christian baker Jack Phillips to bake a wedding cake for same-sex weddings because a commissioner said Phillips’ Christian beliefs on marriage were “despicable.”


The Court left open for another case the broader question of whether the government can force people of faith to participate in same-sex weddings when the government does not openly show open hostility to their religious beliefs
Good, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone, move on. I see you see this as some huge victory for homophobic nutters, good for you. People with guns aren't welcome either.
 
Good, we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone, move on. I see you see this as some huge victory for homophobic nutters, good for you. People with guns aren't welcome either.

In summary, the decision says that the baker won. In detail, the court says the Colorado law is constitutional and still stands, but that the Civil Rights Board applied it badly in this case.
 
In summary, the decision says that the baker won. In detail, the court says the Colorado law is constitutional and still stands, but that the Civil Rights Board applied it badly in this case.
"Tolerance and respect for good-faith differences of opinion are essential in a society like ours."
 
Back
Top