The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread

Hey, did anyone ever bet me on the whole NK gets rid of its nukes things? All you brave boys?

Cause Imma working up a mighty thirst, my brothers, a mi-i-i-i-i-ighty thirst.

Oh, and Goodnight Paulie Nobail...
Goodnight Paulie Nobails failed dismissal motion...
"Even a blind person can see that the true target of the Special Counsel’s investigation is President Trump," Judge Ellis said.
 
unhinged-361x200.png

Unhinged: New RNC Campaign Ad Targets Left’s Heated Rhetoric…and It is BRUTAL
Kira Davis
 
The unions argued that so-called fair share fees pay for collective bargaining and other work the union does on behalf of all employees, not just its members. More than half the states already have right-to-work laws banning mandatory fees, but most members of public-employee unions are concentrated in states that don’t, including California, New York, and Illinois.

Labor leaders fear that not only will workers who don’t belong to a union stop paying fees, but that some union members might decide to stop paying dues if they could in essence get the union’s representation for free.

A recent study by Frank Manzo of the Illinois Public Policy Institute and Robert Bruno of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign estimated that public-sector unions could lose more than 700,000 members over time as a result of the ruling and that unions also could suffer a loss of political influence that could depress wages as well.
 
Sheriff Joe said:
The unions argued that so-called fair share fees pay for collective bargaining and other work the union does on behalf of all employees, not just its members. More than half the states already have right-to-work laws banning mandatory fees, but most members of public-employee unions are concentrated in states that don’t, including California, New York, and Illinois.

Labor leaders fear that not only will workers who don’t belong to a union stop paying fees, but that some union members might decide to stop paying dues if they could in essence get the union’s representation for free.

A recent study by Frank Manzo of the Illinois Public Policy Institute and Robert Bruno of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign estimated that public-sector unions could lose more than 700,000 members over time as a result of the ruling and that unions also could suffer a loss of political influence that could depress wages as well.
Click to expand...

A simple solution would be to apply the union-negotiated payscale and benefits only to the union members. Non-members get the legal minimum wage, holidays, and vacations. Period.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top