Sheriff Joe
DA
Oh, we're used to it alright.If you bend over, you better get used to what happens next.
I think you just helped me figure out why Obama spent his 2 terms bent over, he likes it.
Oh, we're used to it alright.If you bend over, you better get used to what happens next.
QE is the protectionism you're railing about, genius.Oh no! No QE9!!! or 10!!!
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...se-bonds-fall-as-italy-woes-fade-markets-wrap
QE is the protectionism you're railing about, genius.
QE was not directed? Do tell? Do tariffs and duties distort the market? Did QE distort the market?Uh... no. It's not. Quantative easing is not directed the way tarrifs and import duties (and the retaliation) are, genious.
QE is debt genius. With the same effect that debt always has. And what "different effects" are you claiming that QE has as opposed to tariffs.Quantitative easing is, in the long run, a "tax", but it is a very different type of tax with a very different effects.
That's been my point all along. You have no idea. You see only what pops out in front of you in the daily news, as most do. The easy albeit wrong, conclusion, that the market is only reacting to tariffs and duties, is all the news or newspapers have time for. You're drawn, like most, to a single industry (steel) as a singular causal mechanism . This is where you people always tend to want to expand the discussion to fit your narrative that the effect of tariffs is larger than the effects of debt. The bond market, a.k.a. debt markets, dwarfs the steel industry. You also fail to realize the similarities in intent of QE and tariffs. Not to mention the outcomes. Just to be clear, I am not a fan of either policy knowing that their effects are the same. They both distort the market by manipulating prices and thus supply and demand.But what is most important to this discussion, QE (or the omnibus bill that "signaled" QE is over - even though it's been clear it's over for at least a year now) is not what moved the market on the day you and racist Joe claimed it did. Yet, you persist in that stupidity because... I have no idea.
I was just thinking the same thing.That's been my point all along. You have no idea. You see only what pops out in front of you in the daily news, as most do. The easy albeit wrong, conclusion, that the market is only reacting to tariffs and duties, is all the news or newspapers have time for. You're drawn, like most, to a single industry (steel) as a singular causal mechanism . This is where you people always tend to want to expand the discussion to fit your narrative that the effect of tariffs is larger than the effects of debt. The bond market, a.k.a. debt markets, dwarfs the steel industry. You also fail to realize the similarities in intent of QE and tariffs. Not to mention the outcomes. Just to be clear, I am not a fan of either policy knowing that their effects are the same. They both distort the market by manipulating prices and thus supply and demand.
Now if we could just get the PR back up and increase people's wages.
That's been my point all along. You have no idea. You see only what pops out in front of you in the daily news, as most do. The easy albeit wrong, conclusion, that the market is only reacting to tariffs and duties, is all the news or newspapers have time for. You're drawn, like most, to a single industry (steel) as a singular causal mechanism . This is where you people always tend to want to expand the discussion to fit your narrative that the effect of tariffs is larger than the effects of debt. The bond market, a.k.a. debt markets, dwarfs the steel industry. You also fail to realize the similarities in intent of QE and tariffs. Not to mention the outcomes. Just to be clear, I am not a fan of either policy knowing that their effects are the same. They both distort the market by manipulating prices and thus supply and demand.
First thing that popped up (like always when debunking your cherry picked, individual examples) when I googled average wages (but, once again, nice try):You sure about the wage claim?
America gets a raise: Wage growth fastest since 2009
by Patrick Gillespie @CNNMoneyFebruary 2, 2018: 10:35 AM ET
http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/02/news/economy/january-jobs-report-2018/index.html
BUSINESS NEWS
JANUARY 31, 2018 / 6:31 AM / 4 MONTHS AGO
U.S. private payrolls rise strongly, wage growth picking up
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...strongly-wage-growth-picking-up-idUSKBN1FK228
Disneyland Resort offers 36 percent increase in starting wages over three years for Master Services cast members -- one of the most significant increases in its history
Resort offers $15 per hour, two years ahead of California's minimum wage and continues to drive So Cal economy, creating more than 10,000 jobs in last decade
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...icant-increases-in-its-history-300657978.html
Nobody’s interested in making .20 cents an hour more every year for a decade.Now if we could just get the PR back up and increase people's wages.
Funny that a government worker like yourself that self-admittedly couldn't make a dime investing during the O admin is fixated on my situation. Worry about yourself, you are the one who has cried about personal finance woes, not me, I'm fine.Nobody’s interested in making .20 cents an hour more every year for a decade.
You think the Korean vote will be enough to replace those he has lost?Can you even imagine if he gets this done?
Talk about a blood bath in November.
![]()
ON AGAIN!
'NOW WE'RE GOING TO DEAL'![]()