Hüsker Dü
DA
Melania got her parents in.
The Inevitable New The Inevitable Trump Mocking Thread
- Thread starter Nonononono
- Start date
And...?
Didnt Obama get some of his Kenyan kin in?
Do you think the POTUS might have a little sway in that direction?
Its sad that the world isnt perfect, I get it.
When who was born here?
The kids who have illegal alien parents?
If the Democrats nominate another Hillary type candidate that takes the voters for granted, they will loose again...
FDR sent people back to Europe in 40's that were seeking political asylum. They were Jewish.
FDR also confiscated property and locked up American citizens simply because they were of Japanese descent.
FDR was a segregationist.
FDR was a Democrat.
Sheriff Joe
DA
I don’t think facts will work against these people, they just don’t care.
They also have a selective memory.
Sheriff Joe
DA
She can stay.
Correct first paragraph.
Totally irrelevant remainder.
Meanwhile how about the massive spending and ever-increasing deficits under Trump? The GW Bush school of GOP economics.
That’s why the dummies like him so much...it’s how they run their own budgets.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Hilarious, full blinder mode.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Times change, parties move alliances. The Democrats use to be the party of the south. Republicans use to be the party of Reagan. Wow how things have changed, no more shining city on the hill that's for sure.
I see you guys have gone back into full whataboutism mode. Worry about what is happening now, you can't change the past, but oh yeah, you sure do try though.
Sheriff Joe
DA
AUGUST 14, 2019
Of Course, There’s a White' Nationalist Terrorist Threat'!
By Christopher Chantrill
Back on August 4, 2019 our editorial friends at the New York Timesdeclared that “We Have a White Nationalist Terrorist Problem.” (H/T C.J. Hopkins)
Of course they think that. Bless their hearts.
Just imagine how things look from the New York Times building. Here they were, skimming along as unconcernedly as a seagull, basking in the sunset glow of the First Black President and finally, after 20,000 years of bigotry, gay marriage, and then the roof falls in. Some outer-borough yahoo gets elected President of the United States.
What’s the first thing that the Good People would think? Exactly. It’s a conspiracy.
But the next thing, after the outer-borough yahoo unexpectedly dodges the deep state plot to defenestrate him, is to imagine a terrorist movement. I mean, if Trump is still here after they’ve thrown the book at him, he must represent something more sinister than they thought.
White supremacy, in other words, is a violent, interconnected transnational ideology. Its adherents are gathering in anonymous, online forums to spread their ideas, plotting attacks, and cheering on acts of terrorism.
Boy, oh boy. That sounds ominous. We’d better mobilize all the forces of government to attack and defeat this existential threat. And there is nothing more existential than a threat to the power of the ruling class.
Maybe our educated betters are now ready to understand what we normals felt when Joseph McCarthy saw reds under the bed, back in the day.
When there really was an international Communist conspiracy that was not just a bunch of white nobodies in their parents’ basements, but a real global movement backed by an expansionist totalitarian state that had inspired many of the best and brightest to spy for a foreign power against their government.
When all the best people sneered and named and shamed the folks who said, watch out, there are Communists in the State Department.
But I get it. When things start to go wrong with your project, the easiest thing is to lash out and blame -- the tea lady.
Ocasio-Cortez positions herself as a ‘useful idiot’
That is why, dear ruling-class liberals, I have created my maxim,
There is no such thing as justice, only injustice.
I created the idea for my own benefit, to remind me that things that I believe are just and proper are considered by many others to be unjust, straight up.
It could be, but don’t quote me on this, that some things that the Editorial Board of the New YorkTimes thinks are just and proper are experienced by millions of Americans as the very polluted source of injustice.
Item: The United States government passed a Civil Rights Act in 1964 that forbade discrimination on the basis of race and sex. Within a few years the U.S. government was forcing employers to discriminate on the basis of race and sex through the policy of Affirmative Action. Later relabeled as Diversity, because Justice Sandra O’Connor. I wonder if some people might experience that as unjust.
Item: In Losing Ground, Charles Murray in the 1980s noted that the Great Society programs that significantly increased government spending on the poor were heavily instrumented so that social scientists could report on the glorious success of these programs. When the results came in and showed that the programs didn’t work, the government did not accept the settled science and did not terminate the unsuccessful programs. I wonder if some people might think that was unjust.
Item: In The Bell Curve, Charles Murray in the 1990s argued that U.S. society was segregating by IQ, and while this was great for the “cognitive elite” it would not be good for groups with IQs below average. Liberals all accused Murray of racism. I wonder if some people might find this to be what Big Daddy once called “mendacity.”
Item: In Coming Apart, Charles Murray in the 2000s showed White America divided like Gaul into three parts. The top 25 percent were doing fine, with great careers and merger marriages. The middle 40 percent were doing so-so. But for the bottom 35 percent things were not good; the men did not work much and the women did not marry much. Sad! I wonder if those folks in the bottom 35 percent might think the system is unjust.
Now, the Southern Poverty Law Center says that,
According to Murray, disadvantaged groups are disadvantaged because, on average, they cannot compete with white men, who are intellectually, psychologically and morally superior.
But I’d say that, according to Murray, the current system of education and credentialism and government programs is perfectly set up to make life delightful for ruling-class liberals, but fiendishly difficult for people with low IQ, whether former slaves or former hillbillies.
Who are you going to believe? The SPLC or Christopher Chantrill? Your choice.
But go ahead, Editorial Board. Keep peddling your “white nationalist terrorist” schtick. There’s a pony in there somewhere, I know it.
Of Course, There’s a White' Nationalist Terrorist Threat'!
By Christopher Chantrill
Back on August 4, 2019 our editorial friends at the New York Timesdeclared that “We Have a White Nationalist Terrorist Problem.” (H/T C.J. Hopkins)
Of course they think that. Bless their hearts.
Just imagine how things look from the New York Times building. Here they were, skimming along as unconcernedly as a seagull, basking in the sunset glow of the First Black President and finally, after 20,000 years of bigotry, gay marriage, and then the roof falls in. Some outer-borough yahoo gets elected President of the United States.
What’s the first thing that the Good People would think? Exactly. It’s a conspiracy.
But the next thing, after the outer-borough yahoo unexpectedly dodges the deep state plot to defenestrate him, is to imagine a terrorist movement. I mean, if Trump is still here after they’ve thrown the book at him, he must represent something more sinister than they thought.
White supremacy, in other words, is a violent, interconnected transnational ideology. Its adherents are gathering in anonymous, online forums to spread their ideas, plotting attacks, and cheering on acts of terrorism.
Boy, oh boy. That sounds ominous. We’d better mobilize all the forces of government to attack and defeat this existential threat. And there is nothing more existential than a threat to the power of the ruling class.
Maybe our educated betters are now ready to understand what we normals felt when Joseph McCarthy saw reds under the bed, back in the day.
When there really was an international Communist conspiracy that was not just a bunch of white nobodies in their parents’ basements, but a real global movement backed by an expansionist totalitarian state that had inspired many of the best and brightest to spy for a foreign power against their government.
When all the best people sneered and named and shamed the folks who said, watch out, there are Communists in the State Department.
But I get it. When things start to go wrong with your project, the easiest thing is to lash out and blame -- the tea lady.
Ocasio-Cortez positions herself as a ‘useful idiot’
That is why, dear ruling-class liberals, I have created my maxim,
There is no such thing as justice, only injustice.
I created the idea for my own benefit, to remind me that things that I believe are just and proper are considered by many others to be unjust, straight up.
Item: The United States government passed a Civil Rights Act in 1964 that forbade discrimination on the basis of race and sex. Within a few years the U.S. government was forcing employers to discriminate on the basis of race and sex through the policy of Affirmative Action. Later relabeled as Diversity, because Justice Sandra O’Connor. I wonder if some people might experience that as unjust.
Item: In Losing Ground, Charles Murray in the 1980s noted that the Great Society programs that significantly increased government spending on the poor were heavily instrumented so that social scientists could report on the glorious success of these programs. When the results came in and showed that the programs didn’t work, the government did not accept the settled science and did not terminate the unsuccessful programs. I wonder if some people might think that was unjust.
Item: In The Bell Curve, Charles Murray in the 1990s argued that U.S. society was segregating by IQ, and while this was great for the “cognitive elite” it would not be good for groups with IQs below average. Liberals all accused Murray of racism. I wonder if some people might find this to be what Big Daddy once called “mendacity.”
Item: In Coming Apart, Charles Murray in the 2000s showed White America divided like Gaul into three parts. The top 25 percent were doing fine, with great careers and merger marriages. The middle 40 percent were doing so-so. But for the bottom 35 percent things were not good; the men did not work much and the women did not marry much. Sad! I wonder if those folks in the bottom 35 percent might think the system is unjust.
Now, the Southern Poverty Law Center says that,
According to Murray, disadvantaged groups are disadvantaged because, on average, they cannot compete with white men, who are intellectually, psychologically and morally superior.
But I’d say that, according to Murray, the current system of education and credentialism and government programs is perfectly set up to make life delightful for ruling-class liberals, but fiendishly difficult for people with low IQ, whether former slaves or former hillbillies.
Who are you going to believe? The SPLC or Christopher Chantrill? Your choice.
But go ahead, Editorial Board. Keep peddling your “white nationalist terrorist” schtick. There’s a pony in there somewhere, I know it.
Sheriff Joe
DA
AUGUST 14, 2019
‘Assimilate or Leave’ has Always Been U.S. Immigration Policy
By Civis Americanus
The Democratic Left or DemLeft has denounced as racist Trump's recommendation that "the Squad" of four left-wing Members of Congress go back to where they (or their ancestors) came from if they do not like the United States. The DemLeft has doubled down on this accusation by defining the Squad as "women of color" even though Rashida Tlaib is no more a person of color than Donald Trump.
The truth is instead that the Democratic Left has put into practice advice misattributed to Joseph Goebbels: "Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty." The DemLeft is itself the real purveyor of divisive racial identity politics that undermine American Nationalism; the force that has held our country together for more than 240 years and has made the United States the greatest nation on earth.
American Nationalism is Inclusive of All Who Share Our Values
It is very easy to be an American Nationalist. We come in all colors so there is no "us" to look like, and we have freedom of religion so there is no "us" to pray like. You must however share our collective national values to be one of us. This is far from a new concept as shown by the Prussian reformer Johann Fichte's (1808) Addresses to the German Nation. Fichte "…did not divide man-kind into Germans and non-Germans, but rather into those who believed in the spontaneous originality and liberty of man and those who did not. The former, Fichte held, were Germans, no matter what their racial or political affiliation; the latter were not" (Koppel S. Pinson, Modern Germany; its History and Civilization).
American Nationalism is similarly inclusive of all who share our values, and it has zero tolerance for discrimination against any American's race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. Theodore Roosevelt's 1894 essay on “True Americanism” elaborated of recent immigrants, "An immense number of them have become completely Americanized, and these stand on exactly the same plane as the descendants of any Puritan, Cavalier, or Knickerbocker among us, and do their full and honorable share of the nation’s work."
The proposition that people who do not like the United States should go back where they or their ancestors came from predates Donald Trump by almost 200 years. The “Annual Register” of 1820 said of Caucasian immigrants from German-speaking countries, "…if they cannot accommodate themselves to the moral, political, and physical state of this country, the Atlantic Ocean will always be open to them to return to their native countries." Theodore Roosevelt added of predominantly Caucasian immigrants, "It is an immense benefit to the European immigrant to change him into an American citizen. To bear the name of American is to bear the most honorable titles; and whoever does not so believe has no business to bear the name at all, and, if he comes from Europe, the sooner he goes back there the better." Donald Trump has therefore said nothing that has not been said many times before, and by some of our nation's most respected leaders.
Fichte's and Roosevelt's premise was therefore quite simple: anybody who shares our values is one of us, and those who do not share our values do not belong among us, except perhaps as temporary visitors. There are serious questions as to whether "the Squad" and other members of the extreme left wing of the Democratic Party share American values.
Let's start with Squad member Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) who said, "We don’t need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice. We don’t need any more black faces that don’t want to be a black voice.” If a white member of Congress said, "We don't need any more white faces that don't want to be a white voice," we would wonder where he kept his sheet and hood, and we would probably find them. Squad member Ilhan Omar added, "This is not going to be the country of white people." If a Caucasian member of Congress said, "This is not going to be the country of black people," we would expect and probably find a sheet and hood.
Theodore Roosevelt would have almost certainly opined that we don't need any faces of any color that don't want to be American voices. Those that want to be white, black, or brown voices should go back where they (or their ancestors) came from, and the white voices can take their sheets and hoods with them. A story by Robert A. Heinlein meanwhile features an African-American President of the United States who says, "A group calling itself La Raza had better mean the human race -- the whole human race -- or they'll get the same treatment from me as the Ku Klux Klan." This is exactly the treatment that any form of divisive racial identity politics -- Black nationalism, White nationalism, Nation of Islam, or La Raza -- deserves.
Squad member Rashida Tlaib tweeted: "When will the world stop dehumanizing our Palestinian people who just want to be free?" Tlaib's Palestinian people just to want to be free to abuse and terrorize Jews, Christians, Muslims who do not share Hamas' depraved ideology, women and LGBT people, but the bottom line is that if Tlaib considers herself a Palestinian, she should follow Theodore Roosevelt's advice, renounce her American citizenship, and move to "Palestine." Tlaib also argued "…that Palestinians are not responsible for terrorism or vitriol, even as she has lambasted the president’s use of words and called Israel a white-supremacist nation." If Tlaib's Palestinian people are not responsible, then who launched all those rockets and arson balloons at Israel -- the bogeyman?
Ilhan Omar tweeted, "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel" while adding, "It's all about the Benjamins ($100 bills), baby" -- an obvious reference to Jews and money. Omar apologized for this remark but is apparently sorry only that she got caught because she later joined fellow Squad members Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez to support boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against Israel. BDS is nothing more than a way to support Hamaswithout violating laws against providing direct material support to a terrorist organization. Israel, and not Tlaib's Palestinian people, shares American values on the rights and dignity of women, LGBT people, and people of other religions. Omar also equated the Somali deaths during the battle of Mogadishu to those of American soldiers.
These issues have nothing to do with the color of "the Squad's" skins (at least one of which is Caucasian) and everything to do with the content of its character. Theodore Roosevelt and the author of the material in the Annual Register of 1820 would have probably reached the same conclusion as President Trump.
‘Assimilate or Leave’ has Always Been U.S. Immigration Policy
By Civis Americanus
The Democratic Left or DemLeft has denounced as racist Trump's recommendation that "the Squad" of four left-wing Members of Congress go back to where they (or their ancestors) came from if they do not like the United States. The DemLeft has doubled down on this accusation by defining the Squad as "women of color" even though Rashida Tlaib is no more a person of color than Donald Trump.
The truth is instead that the Democratic Left has put into practice advice misattributed to Joseph Goebbels: "Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty." The DemLeft is itself the real purveyor of divisive racial identity politics that undermine American Nationalism; the force that has held our country together for more than 240 years and has made the United States the greatest nation on earth.
American Nationalism is Inclusive of All Who Share Our Values
It is very easy to be an American Nationalist. We come in all colors so there is no "us" to look like, and we have freedom of religion so there is no "us" to pray like. You must however share our collective national values to be one of us. This is far from a new concept as shown by the Prussian reformer Johann Fichte's (1808) Addresses to the German Nation. Fichte "…did not divide man-kind into Germans and non-Germans, but rather into those who believed in the spontaneous originality and liberty of man and those who did not. The former, Fichte held, were Germans, no matter what their racial or political affiliation; the latter were not" (Koppel S. Pinson, Modern Germany; its History and Civilization).
American Nationalism is similarly inclusive of all who share our values, and it has zero tolerance for discrimination against any American's race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation. Theodore Roosevelt's 1894 essay on “True Americanism” elaborated of recent immigrants, "An immense number of them have become completely Americanized, and these stand on exactly the same plane as the descendants of any Puritan, Cavalier, or Knickerbocker among us, and do their full and honorable share of the nation’s work."
The proposition that people who do not like the United States should go back where they or their ancestors came from predates Donald Trump by almost 200 years. The “Annual Register” of 1820 said of Caucasian immigrants from German-speaking countries, "…if they cannot accommodate themselves to the moral, political, and physical state of this country, the Atlantic Ocean will always be open to them to return to their native countries." Theodore Roosevelt added of predominantly Caucasian immigrants, "It is an immense benefit to the European immigrant to change him into an American citizen. To bear the name of American is to bear the most honorable titles; and whoever does not so believe has no business to bear the name at all, and, if he comes from Europe, the sooner he goes back there the better." Donald Trump has therefore said nothing that has not been said many times before, and by some of our nation's most respected leaders.
Let's start with Squad member Ayanna Pressley (D-MA) who said, "We don’t need any more brown faces that don’t want to be a brown voice. We don’t need any more black faces that don’t want to be a black voice.” If a white member of Congress said, "We don't need any more white faces that don't want to be a white voice," we would wonder where he kept his sheet and hood, and we would probably find them. Squad member Ilhan Omar added, "This is not going to be the country of white people." If a Caucasian member of Congress said, "This is not going to be the country of black people," we would expect and probably find a sheet and hood.
Theodore Roosevelt would have almost certainly opined that we don't need any faces of any color that don't want to be American voices. Those that want to be white, black, or brown voices should go back where they (or their ancestors) came from, and the white voices can take their sheets and hoods with them. A story by Robert A. Heinlein meanwhile features an African-American President of the United States who says, "A group calling itself La Raza had better mean the human race -- the whole human race -- or they'll get the same treatment from me as the Ku Klux Klan." This is exactly the treatment that any form of divisive racial identity politics -- Black nationalism, White nationalism, Nation of Islam, or La Raza -- deserves.
Squad member Rashida Tlaib tweeted: "When will the world stop dehumanizing our Palestinian people who just want to be free?" Tlaib's Palestinian people just to want to be free to abuse and terrorize Jews, Christians, Muslims who do not share Hamas' depraved ideology, women and LGBT people, but the bottom line is that if Tlaib considers herself a Palestinian, she should follow Theodore Roosevelt's advice, renounce her American citizenship, and move to "Palestine." Tlaib also argued "…that Palestinians are not responsible for terrorism or vitriol, even as she has lambasted the president’s use of words and called Israel a white-supremacist nation." If Tlaib's Palestinian people are not responsible, then who launched all those rockets and arson balloons at Israel -- the bogeyman?
Ilhan Omar tweeted, "Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel" while adding, "It's all about the Benjamins ($100 bills), baby" -- an obvious reference to Jews and money. Omar apologized for this remark but is apparently sorry only that she got caught because she later joined fellow Squad members Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez to support boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) against Israel. BDS is nothing more than a way to support Hamaswithout violating laws against providing direct material support to a terrorist organization. Israel, and not Tlaib's Palestinian people, shares American values on the rights and dignity of women, LGBT people, and people of other religions. Omar also equated the Somali deaths during the battle of Mogadishu to those of American soldiers.
These issues have nothing to do with the color of "the Squad's" skins (at least one of which is Caucasian) and everything to do with the content of its character. Theodore Roosevelt and the author of the material in the Annual Register of 1820 would have probably reached the same conclusion as President Trump.
Sheriff Joe
DA
August 14, 2019
So which party is truly more racist?
By Jack Hellner
White supremacy has been in the news lately and a leftist Harvard professor, Lawrence Tribe, said the other day that white supremacists are opposed to abortion because they are afraid that too many white babies will be aborted and it would make America less white.
Laurence Tribe’s Fact-Free Defense of Abortion Rights
A cherished myth of abortion-rights supporters is making the rounds again, this time peddled by someone who should know better: Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe. Despite having argued dozens of cases before the United States Supreme Court, Tribe evidently has difficulty uncovering basic facts. Or perhaps, like most blind defenders of the right to kill unborn human beings, he simply disregards them as needed to suit his agenda.
On Sunday, the esteemed professor asserted that white supremacists oppose abortion. He then used this false claim to insinuate a sinister connection between racist and pro-life views:
“White Supremacists oppose abortion because they fear it’ll reduce the number of white infants and thus contribute to what they fear as non-white “replacement.” Never underestimate the way these issues and agendas are linked. This turns “intersectionality” on its head.”
Here Tribe manages to get everything wrong but the part that undermines his argument. There is indeed a link between abortion and white supremacists’ concern about “non-white replacement.” It is precisely because of this fear that white supremacists and members of the alt-Right have long supported legal abortion, applauding the fact that minority women abort their children at disproportionate rates.
It is a shame that someone who has everything so backwards can teach the children, and at what is supposedly a prestigious university, no less.
Fact is, abortion has always killed more black and brown children than white children. White supremacists support abortion, just like all the Democrats running, and most of the media, too, because they know that brown and black babies are aborted at a much higher rate than their percentage of the population. By default, abortion makes America whiter. It seems that the Democrats running are much more supportive of white supremacists than Trump or the Republicans.
The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, wanted to limit immigration to those she approved of and wanted abortion to 'cleanse' America of those she deemed undesirable.
If We’re Tearing Down White Supremacy, Start With Planned Parenthood
The racist, eugenicist roots of Planned Parenthood are well-documented, as is the paranoid racial and eugenic visions of its founder, Margaret Sanger, who spoke of her desire to create “a new race with a racial soul” in the United States, once cheerfully spoke before a women’s Klan meeting, desired to “keep the doors of Immigration closed” to those “whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race,” and yearned to accentuate “the better racial elements in our society” so as to erase from the population “defective stocks—those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
In her depraved mind, that meant minorities and the physically and mentally disabled, all so we could have a 'cleaner' race. That would be a good definition of a racist and a white supremacist. Yet Democrats support whatever her brainchild, Planned Parenthood, wants. They didn't even care when tapes came out showing that abortion is a sick industry which crushes and crunches babies while saving valuable body parts and selling them for profit. The fact that the babies had valuable body parts show that they were humans, not blobs.
I believe every Democrat running should be required to answer the following questions:
Doesn’t your support of abortion on demand, when black and brown babies are aborted at a very high rate lead to a whiter America than Republicans who want to limit abortion?
Which party is more racist: The party that supports abortion on demand or the party which wants more black and brown babies to be born so they can have a chance to lead a long and productive life?
So which party is truly more racist?
By Jack Hellner
White supremacy has been in the news lately and a leftist Harvard professor, Lawrence Tribe, said the other day that white supremacists are opposed to abortion because they are afraid that too many white babies will be aborted and it would make America less white.
Laurence Tribe’s Fact-Free Defense of Abortion Rights
A cherished myth of abortion-rights supporters is making the rounds again, this time peddled by someone who should know better: Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe. Despite having argued dozens of cases before the United States Supreme Court, Tribe evidently has difficulty uncovering basic facts. Or perhaps, like most blind defenders of the right to kill unborn human beings, he simply disregards them as needed to suit his agenda.
On Sunday, the esteemed professor asserted that white supremacists oppose abortion. He then used this false claim to insinuate a sinister connection between racist and pro-life views:
“White Supremacists oppose abortion because they fear it’ll reduce the number of white infants and thus contribute to what they fear as non-white “replacement.” Never underestimate the way these issues and agendas are linked. This turns “intersectionality” on its head.”
Here Tribe manages to get everything wrong but the part that undermines his argument. There is indeed a link between abortion and white supremacists’ concern about “non-white replacement.” It is precisely because of this fear that white supremacists and members of the alt-Right have long supported legal abortion, applauding the fact that minority women abort their children at disproportionate rates.
It is a shame that someone who has everything so backwards can teach the children, and at what is supposedly a prestigious university, no less.
Fact is, abortion has always killed more black and brown children than white children. White supremacists support abortion, just like all the Democrats running, and most of the media, too, because they know that brown and black babies are aborted at a much higher rate than their percentage of the population. By default, abortion makes America whiter. It seems that the Democrats running are much more supportive of white supremacists than Trump or the Republicans.
The founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, wanted to limit immigration to those she approved of and wanted abortion to 'cleanse' America of those she deemed undesirable.
If We’re Tearing Down White Supremacy, Start With Planned Parenthood
The racist, eugenicist roots of Planned Parenthood are well-documented, as is the paranoid racial and eugenic visions of its founder, Margaret Sanger, who spoke of her desire to create “a new race with a racial soul” in the United States, once cheerfully spoke before a women’s Klan meeting, desired to “keep the doors of Immigration closed” to those “whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race,” and yearned to accentuate “the better racial elements in our society” so as to erase from the population “defective stocks—those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
In her depraved mind, that meant minorities and the physically and mentally disabled, all so we could have a 'cleaner' race. That would be a good definition of a racist and a white supremacist. Yet Democrats support whatever her brainchild, Planned Parenthood, wants. They didn't even care when tapes came out showing that abortion is a sick industry which crushes and crunches babies while saving valuable body parts and selling them for profit. The fact that the babies had valuable body parts show that they were humans, not blobs.
I believe every Democrat running should be required to answer the following questions:
Doesn’t your support of abortion on demand, when black and brown babies are aborted at a very high rate lead to a whiter America than Republicans who want to limit abortion?
Which party is more racist: The party that supports abortion on demand or the party which wants more black and brown babies to be born so they can have a chance to lead a long and productive life?
Where is there reference to Children ( Born here ) of Illegals being
separated from " Their " Parents after crossing into the United States
illegally whether thru a legal port of entry or between legal ports of
entry under this administration .....
Post a Valid report stating such an act.....!!!
A Valid Report Rodent.....as you do have a hard time with comprehension.
Mesphistopheles has a firm grip on your shoulders....
Seek the TRUTH and flush the LIES you propagate...
Nonononono
PREMIER
“flush” the lies? Seriously, your coprophilia predilections need professional help.
Sheriff Joe
DA
11-Year-Old Allegedly Raped Repeatedly By Two Illegal Immigrants
August 14th, 2019
Two Illegal Immigrants Allegedly Rape 11-Year-Old In Maryland Montgomery County Police Dept)
Two illegal immigrants have been charged with second degree rape of the same 11-year-old girl in Maryland.
Montgomery County Police arrested Mauricio Barrera-Navidad, 29, of Damascus, Maryland, and Carlos Palacios-Amaya, 28, of Gaithersburg, Maryland, for allegedly raping the same under-aged girl on multiple occasions, WJLA reports.
August 14th, 2019
Two Illegal Immigrants Allegedly Rape 11-Year-Old In Maryland Montgomery County Police Dept)
Two illegal immigrants have been charged with second degree rape of the same 11-year-old girl in Maryland.
Montgomery County Police arrested Mauricio Barrera-Navidad, 29, of Damascus, Maryland, and Carlos Palacios-Amaya, 28, of Gaithersburg, Maryland, for allegedly raping the same under-aged girl on multiple occasions, WJLA reports.