T 2.0

Vice Presidents normally only get 6 months of protection. Biden auto pen extended it for Kamala. T is going back to the norms that all former VPs have had.
I fully understand the circumstances, but it comes off as petty and just adds to the authoritarian claims. I'm tired of the tit for tat politics. It just creates this endless cycle of retribution politics. It's become this scoreboard of Dems vs Repub, instead of just moving forward for Americans. I support many of Trump's policies and think he has been one of the most transformational presidents in his first 6 months, but I can't stand the retribution part of his politics. Sure, you can spin the cancellation of her security detail as a positive in terms of saving money, but we all know that's not what its really about.
 
I fully understand the circumstances, but it comes off as petty and just adds to the authoritarian claims. I'm tired of the tit for tat politics. It just creates this endless cycle of retribution politics. It's become this scoreboard of Dems vs Repub, instead of just moving forward for Americans. I support many of Trump's policies and think he has been one of the most transformational presidents in his first 6 months, but I can't stand the retribution part of his politics. Sure, you can spin the cancellation of her security detail as a positive in terms of saving money, but we all know that's not what its really about.
I would like to point out the following.

After Iranian assassination threats against a number of T 1.0 officials, Dems pulled their security.

We are going to live under 1 set of rules. People should think carefully as to the set of rules they want to live under.
 
I fully understand the circumstances, but it comes off as petty and just adds to the authoritarian claims. I'm tired of the tit for tat politics. It just creates this endless cycle of retribution politics. It's become this scoreboard of Dems vs Repub, instead of just moving forward for Americans. I support many of Trump's policies and think he has been one of the most transformational presidents in his first 6 months, but I can't stand the retribution part of his politics. Sure, you can spin the cancellation of her security detail as a positive in terms of saving money, but we all know that's not what its really about.
Poor baby
 
I would like to point out the following.

After Iranian assassination threats against a number of T 1.0 officials, Dems pulled their security.

We are going to live under 1 set of rules. People should think carefully as to the set of rules they want to live under.
Excellent take Hound
 
Exactly, tit for tat.
For too long Dems have played the lawfare game, the gotcha game, etc with no consequences. Rs have basically allowed that to slide. All that does is encourage them to keep playing games.

If the same rules are now applied to them that they created...maybe we can get them to stop their games.

But if they can play the game for example...Hillary is fine with 30k classified emails and they dont even investigate...but go after T and former T admin people for what they let Hillary slide on...then they should now be subject to their own rules.

We cannot have 1 set of rules for Ds and another for Rs.
 
I fully understand the circumstances, but it comes off as petty and just adds to the authoritarian claims. I'm tired of the tit for tat politics. It just creates this endless cycle of retribution politics. It's become this scoreboard of Dems vs Repub, instead of just moving forward for Americans. I support many of Trump's policies and think he has been one of the most transformational presidents in his first 6 months, but I can't stand the retribution part of his politics. Sure, you can spin the cancellation of her security detail as a positive in terms of saving money, but we all know that's not what its really about.
I don't agree with that in general but I think your point is valid. And frankly, since the democrats are angry Trump won, and Trump is angry about how they blamed him during Joe's 4 years, this is what we'll get until January 2029. And whether it's deliberate or not, which you and I both know it is, it's going to be "authoritarian" no matter what he says or does.

Trump could cure cancer and liberals would gripe that he put thousands of people out of a job.
 
For too long Dems have played the lawfare game, the gotcha game, etc with no consequences. Rs have basically allowed that to slide. All that does is encourage them to keep playing games.

If the same rules are now applied to them that they created...maybe we can get them to stop their games.

But if they can play the game for example...Hillary is fine with 30k classified emails and they dont even investigate...but go after T and former T admin people for what they let Hillary slide on...then they should now be subject to their own rules.

We cannot have 1 set of rules for Ds and another for Rs.
I totally understand where you are coming from, and you're not wrong, but Dem's will just double down. Right now, the Dem's are fighting a so-called threat to democracy, by actually skirting democratic principles.

I'm less worried about elected politicians being held accountable, that can be done with elections, and more concerned for unelected bureaucrats being held accountable. People like Fauci and the 51 "intelligence experts" need to be held accountable. Going after Kamala is rather meaningless given she faced the ultimate humiliation by not getting elected.

You get retribution by winning elections, not by lawfare and petty actions. Democrats face accountability when they lose elections...although they seem to be fucking slow learners.
 
Trump could cure cancer and liberals would gripe that he put thousands of people out of a job.
It's ironic because liberals claim that "we" believe that Trump can do no wrong; however, they are far more indoctrinated in the belief that everything that Trump does is bad. So indoctrinated that he has the Dems taking the wrong side on a whole host of issues.

Who spends more time fixated on Trump? Liberals by a long shot.

There is no question that the Dems claim everything Trump does is authoritarian, whether it is or isn't. The real question is will independents and moderates? I don't think they do, so given the chance, Trump should take the high road. Fuck the current Dem Party, aka the Far Left Party. Why would conservatives want to their vote anyway?
 
I don't agree with that in general but I think your point is valid. And frankly, since the democrats are angry Trump won, and Trump is angry about how they blamed him during Joe's 4 years, this is what we'll get until January 2029. And whether it's deliberate or not, which you and I both know it is, it's going to be "authoritarian" no matter what he says or does.

Trump could cure cancer and liberals would gripe that he put thousands of people out of a job.
And closed down the cancer society, that was started by the guy WHO invented cancer. What comes around goes around and if you fuck around, you will find out. Tit tat is tje same thing as a boomerang smacking you in your dome of hypocracy. These fuckers cencored a sitting US President, spied on him, arrested him, made up BS charges, has to pay that old hag millions (it will get tossed) raided his house and watty is all in a hissy because of tit for that. Buckle up Bronco, its fucking game time.
 
"God is love. The very essence of God is love. Therefore, during times of hardship, sadness, pain and suffering, we naturally and spontaneously take refuge in Him — in love itself — because we know in the core of our hearts that it is only the power and light of God’s love that can drive away the darkness of evil and hatred, which was manifested so tragically and violently upon the children praying in Minneapolis on Wednesday.

So why is it that people like Jen Psaki and others have such a spontaneous visceral negative reaction to those who are praying to God for refuge, strength, and for the wellbeing of the victims of this heinous attack? Because they do not believe in God or His love. Their response is rooted in their hatred of God. They want to be God, so they view Him as their competitor. They are agents of darkness and hatred, and the light of God’s love is a threat to their dark ambitions.

One manifestation of their darkness and desire to be God is their belief that any man can become a woman, and any woman can become a man. This is the insanity and darkness that has unfortunately perpetuated today’s Democrat Party, and is one of the reasons why I could no longer associate myself with them.

It is especially during times like this, when the darkness of hate descends upon us, that we take shelter in and manifest the light of God, which is love.

Rev Martin Luther King spoke the truth beautifully when he said, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.” Tulsi Gabbard
 
Back
Top