T 2.0

BOMBSHELL KICKBACK NEWS: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) backed legislation that funneled millions to his wife’s environmental nonprofit, Ocean Conservancy.

She’s been paid nearly $2.7M while the group raked in $14.2M+ in federal grants—funded by bills Whitehouse voted for!

Now, an ethics watchdog is calling for an investigation into this blatant corruption.

- Libs of TikTok
 
watfly said:
Yep, you indicated the deal wasn't that meaningful because Russia controlled 50% of the minerals. Now Russia may be willing to give up that control which benefits Ukraine and the US. It's fascinating how your tune changes depending on the circumstances.

Again I'm also fascinated how you and others on the left are so concerned about what could happen based on words, yet seem to care little about what has actually happened in deeds. Just making a factual point, and not a "whataboutism", but under whose watch did Russia steal those minerals? Yet Trump potentially recovering apparently is not a big deal to you? Do you just miss the irony, or is it hypocrisy?
Click to expand...
You seem to once again, and typical of rightwingers, be assigning opinions based on assumptions (to erect an easier target to aim at).
 
espola said:
Rather than make an unwarranted assumption, I have to ask -- what is a "demented sex position"?
Click to expand...
Wow, the only time you have asked me a question it has to be about sex and what is a, "demented sex position." I actually have some idea but why don't you share with the class what it means pervert, SMFH!!!!
 
Hüsker Dü said:
You seem to once again, and typical of rightwingers, be assigning opinions based on assumptions (to erect an easier target to aim at).
Click to expand...
Assuming is an Olympic sport for you libs..

You assumed President Trump was guilty..

You assumed Harris would win..

You assumed the American people were not paying attention..
 
watfly said:
Yep, you indicated the deal wasn't that meaningful because Russia controlled 50% of the minerals. Now Russia may be willing to give up that control which benefits Ukraine and the US. It's fascinating how your tune changes depending on the circumstances.

Again I'm also fascinated how you and others on the left are so concerned about what could happen based on words, yet seem to care little about what has actually happened in deeds. Just making a factual point, and not a "whataboutism", but under whose watch did Russia steal those minerals? Yet Trump potentially recovering apparently is not a big deal to you? Do you just miss the irony, or is it hypocrisy?
Click to expand...
No, Russia has offered to partner with the US - they are not giving them up, but jointly exploiting them - as Putin refers to them the "new territories / historical territories". Whatever makes you think they are giving anything up from that article.

Putin said a potential US-Ukraine deal on rare minerals was not a concern and that Russia "undoubtedly have, I want to emphasise, significantly more resources of this kind than Ukraine".
"As for the new territories, it's the same. We are ready to attract foreign partners to the so-called new, to our historical territories, which have returned to the Russian Federation," he added.
 
whatithink said:
No, Russia has offered to partner with the US - they are not giving them up, but jointly exploiting them - as Putin refers to them the "new territories / historical territories". Whatever makes you think they are giving anything up from that article.

Putin said a potential US-Ukraine deal on rare minerals was not a concern and that Russia "undoubtedly have, I want to emphasise, significantly more resources of this kind than Ukraine".
"As for the new territories, it's the same. We are ready to attract foreign partners to the so-called new, to our historical territories, which have returned to the Russian Federation," he added.
Click to expand...
1740524354738.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top