T 2.0

More undercover news from NIH Chief Raja "I shouldn't be saying this but......"

1732805557998.png

NIH leader and Chief of health was afraid of COVID jabs, FDA adviser says Fauci admitted teens don't need vaccine (gee, thanks Dr. Fraud). Do you read this parent? This is utterly insane friends. They & Them lied to you through Teachers and Docs. Follow the money folks. WHO do you know has made a killing by helping injure and kill fellow humans the last 4 years?​

"I don’t want to have a heart attack" said Chief Raja by taking any more jabs.
 
You could be right, but if they shine a light on massive government waste and bureaucracy, maybe they get voters and Congress's attention and there will be a push to do something about it (granted politicians from both sides have their hand in the cookie jar). I'd rather have two successful businessmen, than some politician (aka Gore, who failed when he claimed he was going to do it).

Say one thing about Trump, he has set the bar very high for his administration with his promises. We will see how successful the resistance will be, however, I think it will fail when it comes to immigration. I wouldn't F with Tom Homan. Mind boggling that many Dems want to block the deportation of criminal migrants.
I find it much less mind boggling when you remember why they invited them here, spent 3 years denying they were here or it was a problem, and then tried to say, "shame on Trump" 3 months before the election. There's no other reason to bring them here than votes.
 
So it should be quite easy to pull up an example that’s not Fox or newsmax right?
Pretty fucking easy, dummy.





 
She embezzled millions from a non-profit foundation, causing it to go belly up.
It was her late husband Robert Peterson's foundation, the R. P. Foundation. She was the manager of that foundation. She was initially charged in 2011; the trial was in 2013. She accepted a plea bargain to pay back the $2 million she embezzled (I don't know where that money would have come from). Charges were dropped by the Feds 2 years after her day in court, suggesting at least partial repayment.

Our interaction with her at the charity dinner occurred in November 2009 at the latest, since after that time the organizers moved the dinner away from the Unitarian-Universalist Church social dining room in the Hillcrest neighborhood of San Diego to a Union meeting and dining hall further east (since then converted to a mixed-use apartment and office building at 3912 Centre St.)

Reports from the Indian casinos in San Diego County suggest that she had been observed playing video poker machines at their highest limit ($25 per hand on most machines at that time). The $1 billion reportedly "lost" by O'Connor includes gambling back whatever she had won whenever she won a hand.

Local contemporaneous reporting on the issue --

 
Pretty fucking easy, dummy.





Are you pinch-hitting for Watfly on this question?

The Posse Comitatus Law of 1878 and the passage of 10 U.S. Code § 275 in 1981 forbid the use of Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force personnel to enforce civilian laws. The Coast Guard already has statutory authorization to enforce Federal Laws anywhere in the US or on International Waters, so I guess t and friends could transfer a large part of the Army to the Coast Guard just for this purpose (?).

The only southern border state with a Republican Governor is (and will be next year) Texas. Before the Texas NG troops are deployed to other states, they should first be issued new all-black uniforms with skull pins on their hats.
 
Last edited:
We just asked Elon Musk’s new artificial intelligence chatbot(Grok) “who is the bigger liar out of Musk and Trump?”… and this is what it responded:

“The question of who is a "bigger liar," Donald Trump or Elon Musk, involves subjective judgment and depends on the criteria one uses to define lying, such as frequency, significance of the lies, or public impact. Here are some considerations from both perspectives:

**Donald Trump:**
- **Frequency and Documentation:** Numerous sources, including fact-checking organizations like The Washington Post, have documented thousands of false or misleading claims made by Donald Trump during his presidency. For instance, it's been reported that he averaged about 21 false or misleading claims per day over his term.

- **Public Statements:** Trump's statements have often been scrutinized for their veracity, ranging from personal boasts about his wealth, business dealings, to political claims about election integrity and policy impacts.

- **Political Impact:** His assertions have had significant political implications, contributing to polarization and affecting public trust in media and institutions.

**Elon Musk:**
- **Public Statements and Promises:** Elon Musk has been known for making bold claims about future technologies, timelines for SpaceX and Tesla projects, which sometimes do not materialize as promised. Critics argue this could be seen as misleading, though others might view it as optimistic forecasting typical in tech entrepreneurship.

- **Misinformation on Social Media:** Since acquiring X (formerly Twitter), Musk has been criticized for allowing or promoting content that some consider misinformation, particularly around political issues like election integrity and immigration. There have been instances where Musk's posts or retweets spread unverified or false information.

- **Business Claims:** Musk's statements about Tesla's production capabilities, the readiness of Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving technology, or even his involvement in political discussions have also been controversial.

- **Nature of Lies:** Trump's lies often pertain to personal embellishments, political rhetoric, and policy impacts, whereas Musk's might lean more towards future projections or business-related claims, though both have ventured into misinformation in various forms.

- **Scale and Impact:** Trump's lies have arguably had a broader political and societal impact, influencing elections, policy decisions, and public trust. Musk's statements, while significant in the tech and business community, might not carry the same immediate political weight, though his influence on public discourse through X is notable.

**Conclusion:**
Ultimately, defining who is the "bigger liar" involves personal judgment on what constitutes a lie versus an exaggerated claim or a failed prediction. Both individuals have a record of statements that have been challenged for their truthfulness, but the contexts and consequences of these statements differ significantly. If forced to conclude based on documented frequency and political impact, many might argue Trump has a higher volume of noted falsehoods, but this doesn't preclude Musk's contributions to misinformation, especially in recent years with his social media platform influence.“

Which one of the two do YOU think is the bigger liar?
 
My concern with E&V is that their lack of knowledge & expertise on Fed spending may end up shining the light in the wrong places, hopefully I'm wrong. They also can't actually do anything as they are purposely not a "department" which would require vetting and conflict of interest statements etc. So they need Congress to act. Hopefully their "noise" will not take focus off the serious stuff.

Hegseth said he's going to tackle the 50% of the defense budget that goes to external companies (MIC), RFK is going to take on big pharma/ag/food/health ... that's about 50% of the budget right there between those two.

I don't think either are wrong to put a large target on all the corporate grifters that espouse capitalism while suckling on government sponsored corporate socialism (effectively). MIC & big pharma/ag/food/health have deep pockets in which many many congress people dwell though (Dem & GOP), so this will get interesting.
Maybe cutting funding to universities with bloated endowments and/or those that tolerate/promote anti-Semitic actions can make a small dent in the budget.
 
Maybe cutting funding to universities with bloated endowments and/or those that tolerate/promote anti-Semitic actions can make a small dent in the budget.
Probably not. When we spend 100K helping someone fail to earn a worthless ethnic studies major, it doesn't immediately show up on the budget.

That 100K debt is an albatross around the neck of the student for the rest of their life. It doesn't show up on the budget until decades later. They need to ruin the life of the kid first. Fortunately, the kid has had classes in how to be bitter, so he's prepared.
 
Back
Top