Say bye-bye-bye to Girls and Boys DA

They dont want to leave out someone who can be the core of a competing league.

Overall goal is to limit competition. Same as DA.
All I can say is this USSF company has caused much pain and sorrow across the country. Parents are out thousands of dollars investing in the dream of one day becoming a world class player like Alex or Mia or Megan or Mallory or Sophie or the great OM. People who act and treat people like this are usually lawyer types. They have no empathy. I mean, zero empathy. They feel nothing and just bully and make fun of the victim. Their on here now making fun of all of us. Their trained to feel nothing and blame whatever side has the most money to pay and argue why the victim is to blame. Horrible job sometimes in this profession. Not all all of them act like this BTW
 
The Power-5 implemented this rule back in 2015. All athletic scholarships in the P5 are guaranteed.


The key will be revenues as others have stated. What could happen is the number of scholarships being offered/or budgets get drastically reduced, or programs could just flat out fold....
 
thanks. it helps.

Were you guys doing PEP or anything similar?
No. Not really. It was introduced as a "do it on your own time" thing and none of the girls were doing it. Our club does not mandate it and it really pisses me off. My DD will not go to train or play without doing the prevention exercise first. It's supposed to decrease risk by something like 80%. Clubs need to step in and mandate. We have an ACL thread if you're interested.
 
No. Not really. It was introduced as a "do it on your own time" thing and none of the girls were doing it. Our club does not mandate it and it really pisses me off. My DD will not go to train or play without doing the prevention exercise first. It's supposed to decrease risk by something like 80%. Clubs need to step in and mandate. We have an ACL thread if you're interested.
[/QUO
The Power-5 implemented this rule back in 2015. All athletic scholarships in the P5 are guaranteed.

Note it says "athletic performance". It is designed to protect players who are injured. It says nothing about if the soccer season or program is cancelled. Although I would hope they honor all scholarships.
 
Because there is no “SoCal soccer” to get things right. In fact, if all SoCal clubs got together to coordinate their efforts, we would finally have the evil monopoly that is bad for consumers but which currently does not exist. Because the clubs that did all the work and put all the money in have no incentive to let those that didn’t enjoy the benefit of hard work and financial risk taking. Because the clubs that didn’t do the hard work and take the financial risks have no entitlement to anything. Because clubs like Surf, Blues and Slammers have already proven they develop talent and provide value, and they don’t care how much people who aren’t willing to pay for it whine.
Having watched it over many, many years, Blues does not, I repeat does not, develop talent. They recruit talent, period. They are very good at recruitment and are not afraid to do it right in front of players, coaches and parents.
 
No. Not really. It was introduced as a "do it on your own time" thing and none of the girls were doing it. Our club does not mandate it and it really pisses me off. My DD will not go to train or play without doing the prevention exercise first. It's supposed to decrease risk by something like 80%. Clubs need to step in and mandate. We have an ACL thread if you're interested.
I am interested. The ACL thread seemed to be mostly about those who already had a diagnosis. "How do you get back to soccer?" seemed the main question.

I am more focused on prevention. Is there a thread with good info on that?
 
Sorry if I am misunderstanding this but under what parameters has Beach and Legends not done "all the work" and are not "willing to pay" as it pertains to youth soccer in Southern California? Both of these clubs have built tremendous nationally recognized brands without the benefit of an ENCL monopoly that existed before DA. I would compare their Coaching line-up and college (and YNT) placements with any in the country so check development off the list too that the teams you listed have over them. And they had the audacity to promote the league they were joining!? Oh the horror, no other club has ever done that...

If the rumors are true that politics are keeping top DA teams from joining, it certainly takes the "E" out of ECNL. You would think they would want to play the best teams around. Isn't that what drives our girls, the competition? What are they afraid of? Seems like chicken sh!t to me...

Both are fine clubs that I would classify as some of the “few others” outside ECNL that are worth considering. I don’t have the time or inclination to discuss the history of ECNL that is necessary to fully answer your questions. The very short summary, though, is they did not do the work of creating the league that you want them to be in. If they wanted to be the owners of the most elite league around, they needed to be involved in creating it, and they didn’t. Really, their failure to do so is pretty inexcusable, because Surf left all of SD County ripe for the taking when kept vetoing other clubs in the area. Shoot, GDA was very nearly able to kill ECNL in SoCal the very first year for this reason alone, despite being an otherwise crappy product.

The mere fact that you concede they are very good nationally recognized clubs contradicts your rhetoric that ECNL is a monopoly. There have always been many options, both leagues and clubs, to choose from in SoCal. It is not possible to explain to someone why these clubs did not deserve to be owners of something they did not create until they can comprehend why ECNL is not a monopoly. As long as people keep misusing the term “monopoly” to mean “I don’t think it’s fair that the people who built and own something I want shouldn’t be forced to just give it to me”, there is no helping them.
 
Surf left all of SD County ripe for the taking when they kept vetoing other clubs in the area.
This is what people are referring to when they accuse ECNL clubs of monopolistic behavior.

As long as one club can veto another clubs access to top level competition, people will accuse you of being a monopoly.

And your only defense will be sophistry over definitions: No, we aren't a monopoly. Look up the definition. We are more of a cabal.

(A cabal with horrible rates of child injuries, btw)
 
But I can't help but wonder if the DA contingent here would be complaining that DA wasn't opening its doors for all the ECNL clubs if ECNL self-immolated today.
I wanted to see Slammers join DA...then you would have had the top SW clubs together. Not having the top teams together in the same league is annoying.
 
No Beach, no Albion and most surprising, no Legends.

just Surf & Real So Cal. Pure speculation but Blues get 2nd team (if Surf negotiated this months ago they did it with blues and real so cal).

I also expect a 2nd Vegas team (long way to go for one game). Two brackets of 8 in Southwest.
Who in LV... LV Albion or Las Vegas Soccer Academy? are there other competitive clubs there.
 
You expecting anyone else from TX-OK area back in?
Not sure how the landscape will shake out. Oklahoma Energy seems to be the odd team out. Not sure how Sting Austin holds on seeing that Lonestar is in their backyard. Either that or Lonestar players migrate to Sting Austin. It also means that Sting Soccer has two ECNL teams in Texas. I've heard a bunch of people making predictions about who will hold on, who will be left out and who will be invited in. We'll see. It will be interesting to see what happens to Tophat, Beach, Legends, NEFC and FC Virginia. What a mess.
 
Back
Top