Yeah it's called the DPL, its already in existence ....
Good point.
Yeah it's called the DPL, its already in existence ....
Unfortunately we will be back to just one monopoly managed by the same corrupt ECNL dumb asses that were just slightly smarter than the DA dumb asses. There will be no way for smaller clubs to field a top team, no matter how good the coaching. This will make it easier for mega clubs to shield abusive coaches. This will limit opportunities for less affluent players and will not help increase the popularity of soccer in this country. It doesn't matter for me, my kids are out of this system. It does make me sad for all the players that will not get the opportunity to play at a higher level. It will mean that the National Teams will have a smaller pool to draw from. Parents that can afford to participate better get ready to spend more money, because costs will not go down. Our only hope is that our kids fix the mess we have created.
How many times are you going to misuse the terms “monopoly” and “corrupt”? Not getting what you want simply because you’re too cheap to pay for it does not make a company either of those things. There are literally thousands of youth soccer clubs that don’t play ECNL and hundreds of leagues. Even those that do play ECNL typically have teams playing in other leagues. To the extent you keep getting bent out of shape that the best clubs have no interest in playing the lesser ones that you were willing to pay for, that is your problem. You get what you pay for.
You are 2 years behind. West Coast became oc surf 2 years ago. They recently announced (3 months ago) that they are going back to West Coast FC.I think West Coast is OC Surf now.
I guess 3 months behind...You are 2 years behind. West Coast became oc surf 2 years ago. They recently announced (3 months ago) that they are going back to West Coast FC.
A lot of hysteria being projected here based on a general Tweet...let's all keep the toilet paper on the shelves.
What is likely? DA is not going to leave all of its clubs hanging without a league for this next year---to begin a few months from now. If they are going to get out of providing a league, it will be a phase out and announced well in advance.
More likely is that they will announce a cancellation of the rest of this season (duh), and will keep their league operating, just make changes to rules/restrictions--eg, allowing high school. Maybe also expand the division system as they have experimented with in a couple age groups on the boys side.
ECNL has no incentive to let other clubs in -- they don't need 'em. Especially since their only competitor is floundering.
One thing for sure...look for clubs to try and get your money asap so you're locked in with them. As usual in club soccer, the kids are an afterthought. Advice to youngers parents...find another sport. The BS in this youth sport isn't worth it.
Not sure how it is in SoCal, but there are other regions around the country where ECNL teams regularly play outside of ECNL. ECNL has no rules that prevent ECNL teams from playing outside competition. In NorCal, ECNL teams play in NPL in conjunction with ECNL. This is actually a selling point, since it allows players who get less playing time in ECNL to play more in NPL games which is great for their development.You might have something there. You might also be ignoring the obvious fact that when a group of clubs declares themselves to be too good to play anyone outside their exclusive group they will be suspected of trying to pull a fast one.
I am not sure why you keep attacking me personally and calling me cheap. My players are done with all of this and I did pay for one of them to play on a top level team and travel all over the country. That team that was good enough to give a serious game to any team in the country in their age group and they beat Surf's ECNL National Champs at their own tournament. Where do your players play?How many times are you going to misuse the terms “monopoly” and “corrupt”? Not getting what you want simply because you’re too cheap to pay for it does not make a company either of those things. There are literally thousands of youth soccer clubs that don’t play ECNL and hundreds of leagues. Even those that do play ECNL typically have teams playing in other leagues. To the extent you keep getting bent out of shape that the best clubs have no interest in playing the lesser ones that you were willing to pay for, that is your problem. You get what you pay for.
DPL's selling point was that it was for players who had potential to play on the DA team. A bit less restrictive with mandatory 4x practice and not quite as much travel. If that carrot of being moved to the DA team is gone - Why would DPL still exist?Yeah it's called the DPL, its already in existence ....
It’s not a rumor. It’s a done deal. DA will be terminated next week. Again, Covid situation certainly didn’t help, but the main issue was the USWNT lawsuit. They will no longer be able to operate with something like 40-60 mil they’ll have to shell out.
It’s not a rumor. It’s a done deal. DA will be terminated next week. Again, Covid situation certainly didn’t help, but the main issue was the USWNT lawsuit. They will no longer be able to operate with something like 40-60 mil they’ll have to shell out.
Yes, USSF does have about 100 million in their reserve, but they are losing god awful amount of it as we speak. They’ve mismanaged massively with the DA(I don’t know the exact amount, but they’ve been losing somewhere in 7 figures at least with the GDA annually) and with this lawsuit, they don’t have much of a choice. I must add that they deserve to be where they are with the way they’ve handled things imo.Lots of questions.
Link to the "DA being terminated next week?" There sure is a lot of smoke pointing to that, but it's still all rumors.
Also, some of this doesn't add up to me regarding the lawsuit breaking the Federation. First of all, the lawsuit is still in the courtss and most feel the Federation is more likely than not to win it.
Isn't the Federation sitting on 9 figures of cash? And why is running the DA so expensive for them? The clubs carry the majority of costs, don't they? Isn't the Federation just hosting a few showcases and playoffs?
Help me understand.
DA on a boys side with MLS clubs only will be a logistical nightmare. We only have 2 MLS teams locally in LA, which means a lot of traveling for those boys to play games. Those teams will have to be just like reserve teams for European teams. I don't know if MLS will be able to sustain the cost of this.
I'm suspecting USL teams will be starting their own Boys youth league.....
Yes, USSF does have about 100 million in their reserve, but they are losing god awful amount of it as we speak. They’ve mismanaged massively with the DA(I don’t know the exact amount, but they’ve been losing somewhere in 7 figures at least with the GDA annually) and with this lawsuit, they don’t have much of a choice. I must add that they deserve to be where they are with the way they’ve handled things imo.
I disagree. As long as the league is based on club memberships, it creates a bunch of mini-monopolies for those clubs in their regions. The member clubs have less incentive to treat players and parents fairly. If the league membership were based purely on team results in each age group, and had true promotion and relegation that provided a pathway for any team to join based on results, then clubs would have incentive to treat players and parents with respect. Do not mistake my argument as a defense of GDA which was beyond any doubt a flawed league with all of these same problems. ECNL was not created to better develop players, it was created to extract money from your pockets to club DOC's and the ECNL organization. The best system would be for no club based leagues and a return to a system like USYS National League and National Championships. In that system, teams earned their place and clubs worked to retain good teams and coaches.
But again, the DA isn't supposed to be a money maker. This isn't the for-profit ECNL. The DA is designed to be a money loser and is a place for the Federation to invest dollars for the hopeful return of developing better players. It seems flimsy that the reason for killing the DA is that costs were surprisingly spiraling out of control (nor should Covid-19 be having an outsized impact given the business model).
There's plenty of money to see out a lawsuit that they likely win and still stand up the DA. Perhaps the Federation doesn't want to invest in the DA anymore, and there's good reasons for why that might be, but it seems to me the argument that their hand is being forced due to financial ruin is questionable.
I am not sure why you keep attacking me personally and calling me cheap. My players are done with all of this and I did pay for one of them to play on a top level team and travel all over the country. That team that was good enough to give a serious game to any team in the country in their age group and they beat Surf's ECNL National Champs at their own tournament. Where do your players play?
As to misusing the terms "monopoly" and "corrupt", how exactly would you label the Surf/ECNL partnership in San Diego county prior to the formation of GDA?
Why are you so in favor of closed leagues? Are you afraid of some local competition like Surf appeared to be back when my player was playing? Are you somehow making money from ECNL?