President Joe Biden

This is pretty funny:


Nobody is even there....all of Tech is working remotely right now. I guess Twitter employees will watch the protest on the news.
A friend and I were just talking about this. This is fairly close to some pretty hardcore areas, (meaning- within driving distance for a lot of places.) This could become a crazy situation.
 
I know it happened- but what other facts do I need to check? All I'm saying is bombing is wrong- how is that debatable? I'm not touching anything else. You can debate the granular, feel free.

The bombing is a fact, however no evidence was ever presented that she "planted the bomb". She was arrested two years later on a separate charge of possession of weapons and explosives.
 
I know it happened- but what other facts do I need to check? All I'm saying is bombing is wrong- how is that debatable? I'm not touching anything else. You can debate the granular, feel free.

2. How would a bomb be planted to specifically "assassinate Republican Senators"?

3. She was pardoned after serving 16 years for a crime for which the average sentence for first-time offenders was 5 years.

4. I could find no such entity as Black Lives Matter Network, Inc. The closest might be Black Lives Matter Global Network, a charitable corporation that seems to be the overall governing body of local BLM chapters.

5. Ms. Rosenberg is a board member of a different non-profit, Thousand Currents, a highly rated charity (4 out of 4 stars from Charity Navigator). TC was contracted by BLMGN to handle their fundraising activities since they grew so rapidly this year and were overwhelmed with the regulatory paperwork.

Mike Yoder purports to be a lawyer, so one might suppose he is interested in fine details like those. I will not propose an opinion on why he was so sloppy on that tweet.

 
I get it, you hate trump - your choice, free country, continue to froth over the idea - doesn't bother me. He will get what he deserves.

Part dos of your statement is utter BS. There are more than 3 black trump supporters in this country. Your little world consists of your keyboard and the usual social media platforms. Go ahead and pivot on your backfoot and tell me what I should think. It's a racist term. Tell you what, walk down the street, in your hood or another hood, find a black man or woman who supports trump, and call them a trumpanzee. Tell me exactly what them black folk do.

Ok, maybe there are six or seven. If I single one out because they are black, I’ll make sure to use a different term because, otherwise, that would be wrong.

Enjoy the impeachment process! I can’t wait for Karen Grace to start posting how holding people accountable for sedition and insurrection is worse than the sedition itself. Today is such a dark day in America for Mrs. Neville Chamberlain and the rest of her appeaser friends.
 
Yet another reason Grace Karen is so wrong in her full-throated support of appeasement is that there will be no more obstruction now that Dems control both the House and Senate. No more opposition to subpoenas for docs to the WH or executive branches, virtually every ‘publican in office will need to keep their head down, and there will be plenty of people chomping at the bit to testify against the patina piece of s**t. Tech companies will be thrilled to taking down the patina-ed piece of shit and his mostly toothless, unemployed loser followers, and guess who’s got all the Parler dms for Nunes, Clarence the magat Thomas’ wife, coke fiend Donny boy jr, Hawley, Pompeo, all of those traitors? That would be Jeff Bezos.

There will be a constant drip, drip, drip of new awful information every day to embarrass and humiliate ‘publicans. It will destroy the re-election chances of one trumpanzee after the next. And when Donny Depends pardons himself and his family, they can’t even rely on the 5th anymore. This is going to be great.
 
Yet another reason Grace Karen is so wrong in her full-throated support of appeasement is that there will be no more obstruction now that Dems control both the House and Senate. No more opposition to subpoenas for docs to the WH or executive branches, virtually every ‘publican in office will need to keep their head down, and there will be plenty of people chomping at the bit to testify against the patina piece of s**t. Tech companies will be thrilled to taking down the patina-ed piece of shit and his mostly toothless, unemployed loser followers, and guess who’s got all the Parler dms for Nunes, Clarence the magat Thomas’ wife, coke fiend Donny boy jr, Hawley, Pompeo, all of those traitors? That would be Jeff Bezos.

There will be a constant drip, drip, drip of new awful information every day to embarrass and humiliate ‘publicans. It will destroy the re-election chances of one trumpanzee after the next. And when Donny Depends pardons himself and his family, they can’t even rely on the 5th anymore. This is going to be great.
Did you just have a juice box?
 
The D's have moved from just censuring the House ringleaders challenging the election results to actively seeking their expulsion. They only need a majority to do it, but will weaponize the expulsion process. A. several African American congressmen challenged the 2016 election and are currently serving in Congress...they lacked Senate support so it didn't go anywhere...but for the record this idea of challenging election results in Congress we don't like was originally a D fringe idea. B. it's undemocratic...seeking to overturn the will of the voters in those congressional districts, and C. does anybody doubt in 2022 if the Rs take the House (they only need a handful of votes) and Nancy Pelosi is still around that the Rs won't retaliate by expelling her. The Republic's election system is already creeking close to breaking and now they want to do this. We spent the spring and summer normalizing political violence and it was that normalization (as much as Trump's awful behavior) that made the takeover of the Capitol a possibility. If people feel elections are no longer working and the majority party can expel those of the minority they think have gone over the line, it's a bad combination with the normalization of political violence.
 
The D's have moved from just censuring the House ringleaders challenging the election results to actively seeking their expulsion. They only need a majority to do it, but will weaponize the expulsion process.

Dear Ms. Constitutional Lawyer --

Guess where I got this from --

"Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member."
 
The D's have moved from just censuring the House ringleaders challenging the election results to actively seeking their expulsion. They only need a majority to do it, but will weaponize the expulsion process. A. several African American congressmen challenged the 2016 election and are currently serving in Congress...they lacked Senate support so it didn't go anywhere...but for the record this idea of challenging election results in Congress we don't like was originally a D fringe idea. B. it's undemocratic...seeking to overturn the will of the voters in those congressional districts, and C. does anybody doubt in 2022 if the Rs take the House (they only need a handful of votes) and Nancy Pelosi is still around that the Rs won't retaliate by expelling her. The Republic's election system is already creeking close to breaking and now they want to do this. We spent the spring and summer normalizing political violence and it was that normalization (as much as Trump's awful behavior) that made the takeover of the Capitol a possibility. If people feel elections are no longer working and the majority party can expel those of the minority they think have gone over the line, it's a bad combination with the normalization of political violence.

I don't expect the Dems to do anything controversial as that's their MO. They're all bark no bite.

I don't think Dems ever intended to use the objection process as a method to overturn an election result. I don't think that was the case with the repubs on 1/6. Most of the times Dems have objected is to highlight voter suppression, which is a real thing -- as opposed to this bogus narrative Trump put together. Anyway, more here:

 
the D's knives out continue. The NY Bar now has begun an inquiry to disbar Rudy Guiliani

The D's have filed impeachment articles (vote Wednesday, earliest they can be taken up by the Senate is the day before the inauguration but Ds still talking about maybe filing after first 100 days) on the grounds on inciting an insurrection (they have the obvious problem there that Trump did not command his people to engage in violence of seize the Capitol, and he told them to go home...which leads to the curious question that (if they cared) how the Ds are going to make this case).
 
Back
Top