Ponderable

What the Hell are you talking About ?

You lose your mind ......Bob ?
I don't think so. I'm just ahead of you after setting a few bear traps covered in light foliage I've placed behind me on this path that you're unaware you are about to step in. Although I see your left foot is securely bound by my first trap. Doesn't it smart? Maybe by now your ankles are numb to these traps.
 
I don't think so. I'm just ahead of you after setting a few bear traps covered in light foliage I've placed behind me on this path that you're unaware you are about to step in. Although I see your left foot is securely bound by my first trap. Doesn't it smart? Maybe by now your ankles are numb to these traps.


zq550kncufyz.png


Hold still Bob !
 
Are you personally selecting the term "illegal" for a jury's verdict, or just quoting a nincompoop blog headline writer's sensational use of that word?

If it's your word, what criminal statute are you relying upon for your opinion?
Illegal alien, do you not understand the term?
 
Are you personally selecting the term "illegal" for a jury's verdict, or just quoting a nincompoop blog headline writer's sensational use of that word?

If it's your word, what criminal statute are you relying upon for your opinion?
Perhaps "Illegal Alien 'Not Guilty' ... would have been the blogger or the internet "news" cite's editor's job to catch before it goes out. But there are so many times this oversight function of editor has been deemed unnecessary no matter any news organization's size, value, political leaning, etc. in the race to have a breaking news alert 23 seconds faster than their competition.
 
Perhaps "Illegal Alien 'Not Guilty' ... would have been the blogger or the internet "news" cite's editor's job to catch before it goes out. But there are so many times this oversight function of editor has been deemed unnecessary no matter any news organization's size, value, political leaning, etc. in the race to have a breaking news alert 23 seconds faster than their competition.
Lil 'joe's sources are usually just one guy in his mom's basement . . . kinda like him.
 
Re: Steinle

I'm hearing it was a prosecutorial error, they chose to try and convict on murder instead of manslaughter. They would likely have had success if they had gone for the lesser charge. You don't get to shoot for the higher charge and end up with a conviction on lesser, it's all or nothing.
 
Re: Steinle

I'm hearing it was a prosecutorial error, they chose to try and convict on murder instead of manslaughter. They would likely have had success if they had gone for the lesser charge. You don't get to shoot for the higher charge and end up with a conviction on lesser, it's all or nothing.
Didn't you call this one?
 
Re: Steinle

I'm hearing it was a prosecutorial error, they chose to try and convict on murder instead of manslaughter. They would likely have had success if they had gone for the lesser charge. You don't get to shoot for the higher charge and end up with a conviction on lesser, it's all or nothing.
The jury could have found this guy guilty of lessor crimes, including manslaughter. They decided he was only guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
These prosecutors must have attended law school with the same group of prosecutors who failed to convict OJ.
Seven felony convictions and the guy has been deported five times....when he killed Steinle he was once again in the country illegally.
It's no wonder folks want a border fence...
_______________________________________________
The jury, which included three immigrants, found 54-year-old Jose Ines Garcia Zarate guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, but after nearly a week of deliberations it acquitted the five-time-deported Mexican national on first-degree and second-degree murder charges as well as involuntary manslaughter.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/30/kate-steinle-shooting-jury-reaches-verdict/
 
Back
Top