Start with involuntary manslaughter and reckless homicide....
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
No you dumb ass. Who said they were?
Obviously and nor surprising, you are clueless when it comes to jury nullification
Despite the evidence, including the DNA evidence, the jury ruled not guilty.
In both cases juries let the murders go free...
The jury considered those laws and ruled not guilty. They were not ignored.
A police officer reported the gun missing. To say that it was stolen (by anyone) is a supposition without supporting evidence.
Hüsker Dü
DA
The officers "drop gun" fell out of his ankle harness eh?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Holster, numb nuts. Ankle holster.
Back up, numb nuts. Back up weapon.
Horseshit.
They were ignored or not understood.
Do you really believe this was an unavoidable accident?
Last edited:
Good lord Magoo...get a grip, get the story right or shut the hell up.
Thursday, October 26, 2017
SAN FRANCISCO --
Jurors witnessed a series of tense exchanges between attorneys in San Francisco Superior Court on Thursday as a federal Bureau of Land Management ranger whose stolen gun was used in the fatal shooting of Kate Steinle at Pier 14 two years ago took the stand. ....
....As part of their case, the defense attorneys have placed the actions of Ranger John Woychowski, whose gun was stolen from a car in San Francisco shortly before the shooting, at the center of their case.
Woychowski was off duty and stopping off in San Francisco on a family trip to a temporary posting in Helena, Montana, on the night of June 27, 2015, when the gun was stolen.
http://abc7news.com/ranger-testifies-on-theft-of-gun-used-in-steinle-shooting-in-sf/2571467/
Stolen gun in Steinle killing raises question…
6 at 1:12 pm | UPDATED: December 2, 2016 at 3:55 pm
SAN FRANCISCO — Should the government share in the blame for the death of Kate Steinle because a federal ranger left his pistol in a backpack that was stolen from inside his vehicle?
U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero raised that question Friday during a federal court hearing in a lawsuit brought by Steinle’s family over whether the Bureau of Land Management and other agencies are liable for her death.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/12/...n-blm-gun-in-familys-suit-against-government/
I see your mind is made up without seeing the evidence. That's called prejudice.
Who stole it (if it was indeed stolen)?
Coming from a man that doesn't know the facts of the case is sadly amusing and unfortunately ignorant....
You're pathetic....
Who used it to kill someone ya dipstick?
If you're found driving a stolen car that just killed someone on a sidewalk...I'd love to hear you claim you found the car sitting in the road and decided to move it and it simply drove itself onto the sidewalk killing the pedestrian... pathetic indeed.
It's very noble of you to admit your ignorance. Here is a good starting point on your education --
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-kate-steinle-analysis-20171202-story.html
The man was in possession of a stolen gun that he negligently fired killing someone.
The Times article doesn't dispute that fact. Why are you having such a hard time understanding that fact?
....As part of their case, the defense attorneys have placed the actions of Ranger John Woychowski, whose gun was stolen from a car in San Francisco shortly before the shooting, at the center of their case.
http://abc7news.com/ranger-testifies-on-theft-of-gun-used-in-steinle-shooting-in-sf/2571467/
Sheriff Joe
DA
That's bainte.
Illegal Alien Convicted of Sexual Assault Deported from U.S. 20 Times
12 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...OjAG&usg=AOvVaw1KZrn71BTK78D-s42jHRjc&cf=1
Illegal Alien Convicted of Sexual Assault Deported from U.S. 20 Times
12 hours ago
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...OjAG&usg=AOvVaw1KZrn71BTK78D-s42jHRjc&cf=1
That's an interesting analysis since the article actually says ==
Legal experts said prosecutors had an uphill battle because there was no clear motive in the case. Further muddling the shooter’s intentions: evidence that the bullet hit the ground just 12 feet from the defendant before ricocheting those 78 feet into Steinle.
“On its surface, it seemed like a tough case to prove intent to kill,” said Jim Hammer, former head of the San Francisco district attorney’s homicide unit. “That ricochet, I assume, was a big thing for the jury.”
He said if there are two reasonable explanations on a criminal charge, one pointing toward guilt, one pointing to innocence, California law mandates that jurors must acquit.
Defense attorney Matt Gonzalez argued Garcia Zarate found the stolen pistol wrapped in a rag on the pier and that it accidentally fired when he picked it up.
“On its surface, it seemed like a tough case to prove intent to kill,” said Jim Hammer, former head of the San Francisco district attorney’s homicide unit. “That ricochet, I assume, was a big thing for the jury.”
He said if there are two reasonable explanations on a criminal charge, one pointing toward guilt, one pointing to innocence, California law mandates that jurors must acquit.
Defense attorney Matt Gonzalez argued Garcia Zarate found the stolen pistol wrapped in a rag on the pier and that it accidentally fired when he picked it up.
Hüsker Dü
DA
So he found a pistol that was previously stolen, but at the time he found it, it was laying on the ground, on the pier, wrapped in a rag.
That was the defense's story. The prosecution failed to present a credible alternative.
Yeah, that's the ticket...
Hüsker Dü
DA
In court the judge and jury need to make a decision based on the evidence presented, not on conjecture or what Hannity says happened.