Ponderable

…JURY THAT ACQUITTED ILLEGAL ALIEN WAS NOT SEQUESTERED, STACKED WITH MILLENNIALS…
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...was-not-sequestered-stacked-with-millennials/
We now know through the testimony that this wasn't the heinous cold blooded murder that the Hannity/Trumps of the world sold you on (and you wholeheartedly swallowed). But this was more than just a felon in procession of a firearm. Whether he "found it" or not he was ultimately responsibly for the effects the firearm and it's discharging brought about. Someone died due to his actions. An "accident", is when someone walks out in front of a vehicle in traffic, NOT when someone has a gun in his hand. Our gun laws need to be changed, period.
 
Yep. I would like to hear how this jury came to the conclusion they did.
The jury had to believe this entire tragedy was nothing more than an unavoidable accident....

The defense's version was pretty much that it was an accident. The prosecution failed to crack that story in the jury's eyes. They convicted him of the thing he admitted, even though that was pretty much accidental as well.
 
The defense's version was pretty much that it was an accident. The prosecution failed to crack that story in the jury's eyes. They convicted him of the thing he admitted, even though that was pretty much accidental as well.
That guy was a convicted felon was he not? Did we do away with the 3 strikes law?
 
We now know through the testimony that this wasn't the heinous cold blooded murder that the Hannity/Trumps of the world sold you on (and you wholeheartedly swallowed). But this was more than just a felon in procession of a firearm. Whether he "found it" or not he was ultimately responsibly for the effects the firearm and it's discharging brought about. Someone died due to his actions. An "accident", is when someone walks out in front of a vehicle in traffic, NOT when someone has a gun in his hand. Our gun laws need to be changed, period.
It's called jury nullification....the laws are already on the books.
When the jury decides to ignore the law, these things occur. Same thing happened in the OJ trial.
 
He acquired the firearm outside the regulated channels.
I thought he claimed to have found it? . . . and what I meant was use a gun in an unsafe manner should be instant jail time. The law on gun use should be so strict that if you are even caught with a gun anywhere and are not in strict compliance with the law your gun rights should be stripped and the punishment for any crime involved should be multiplied severely. If you have a gun in your possession that you aren't carry papers for you should do time, period.
 
Are millennials not Americans?
Yes, but in the "other" category for the Breitbart crowd . . . unless of course they are your own children then they are just kids. Kinda like how any teenager of color (especially after being gunned down by police) is "practically an adult" but Trumps 30 something children are just "kids".
 
We now know through the testimony that this wasn't the heinous cold blooded murder that the Hannity/Trumps of the world sold you on (and you wholeheartedly swallowed). But this was more than just a felon in procession of a firearm. Whether he "found it" or not he was ultimately responsibly for the effects the firearm and it's discharging brought about. Someone died due to his actions. An "accident", is when someone walks out in front of a vehicle in traffic, NOT when someone has a gun in his hand. Our gun laws need to be changed, period.
It was a stolen gun from a LEs vehicle, stolen by someone who shouldn't even be here. If he's not here, she ain't shot in the back in front of her dad.
 
Yes, but in the "other" category for the Breitbart crowd . . . unless of course they are your own children then they are just kids. Kinda like how any teenager of color (especially after being gunned down by police) is "practically an adult" but Trumps 30 something children are just "kids".
You are going sideways.
 
We now know through the testimony that this wasn't the heinous cold blooded murder that the Hannity/Trumps of the world sold you on (and you wholeheartedly swallowed). But this was more than just a felon in procession of a firearm. Whether he "found it" or not he was ultimately responsibly for the effects the firearm and it's discharging brought about. Someone died due to his actions. An "accident", is when someone walks out in front of a vehicle in traffic, NOT when someone has a gun in his hand. Our gun laws need to be changed, period.
The guy stole the gun.
Even if you believe he "found it", he's still a felon in possession of a gun, already illegal.
What "gun law" would have stopped this crime?
How many laws were broken in order to put this guy on a pier in San Francisco with a gun?
 
Stole? No evidence to support that claim was presented at the trial.
The gun was stolen. The gun was in the defendants possession. That gun was used to kill.
No evidence was presented to support someone else pulled the trigger.
The judge & the jury nullified this homicide to nothing more than an unfortunate accident....
 
Back
Top