That's pretzel logic, but if it's all you got, go with it.
And how is the NTSB at fault?
That's pretzel logic, but if it's all you got, go with it.
I can tell when I have scored a point on E, when he doesn't understand the difference between pro-business and pro-markets. He just can't seem to put the bag of pretzels down.That's pretzel logic, but if it's all you got, go with it.
You showed nothing about $pecific co$t $aving$ liar.I said "money-saving" and "saved money", and showed how. I also said you are clueless in this matter, and you have shown that repeatedly.
How much money did AA save? More importantly, did they lose any money relating to the specific maintenance? (Pre-accident money of course)AA saved money by not having to purchase the specific maintenance equipment specified by the manufacturer.
How much money did AA save?AA saved money by not performing a detailed engineering analysis of their altered procedure to determine that it could be done without damage to the engine or aircraft
How much money did AA save?AA saved money by reducing several manhours on every engine swap, which occur regularly even on healthy aircraft. AA saved money by not performing inspections looking for possible damage caused by their altered procedure.
How much money did AA save or lose?And how is the NTSB at fault?
How much money did AA save? More importantly, did they lose any money relating to the specific maintenance? (Pre-accident money of course)
How much money did AA save?
How much money did AA save?
From the time you entered the discussion you've not been able to show that AA either saved or lost money prior to the accident. Please continue.
Yes please.Let's see - they didn't buy the recommended maintenance equipment, they didn't do the safety and effectiveness analysis, and they took less time to do the tasks --- do you need help with a spreadsheet for this?
Where was the NTSB during these maintenance evolutions? Isn't that what they are there for.....Safety? Pre-tragedy of course.they didn't do the safety and effectiveness analysis,
Where was the NTSB during these maintenance evolutions? Isn't that what they are there for.....Safety? Pre-tragedy of course.
Have you ever worked in an Aviation Safety Department, QA, both?The NTSB is tasked with investigating accidents, after the fact.
Have you ever worked in an Aviation Safety Department, QA, both?
Ha-ha.Ann Coulter bombed on Comedy Central Roast of Rob Lowe this week, and is blaming CC editing. He/she turned down some prepared material she was offered because it was "too mean". Ha - imagine that.
CDI?Flightline QA inspector for AT maintenance.
CDI?
You assumed correctly. What platforms?Assume you mean collateral duty inspector. Verified effective and appropriate repair, verified technician's qualifications, verified connectors, mounting hardware and access properly secured, swept work area for tools, equipment, and debris. Most of the time I did that was night shift.
In my industrial life I wrote acceptance documents and test procedures, among other things.
You assumed correctly. What platforms?
Ann Coulter bombed on Comedy Central Roast of Rob Lowe this week, and is blaming CC editing. He/she turned down some prepared material she was offered because it was "too mean". Ha - imagine that.
Aha,..YES!,.. Point Magoo! ,..I remember it well..Pt. Mugu had a little bit of everything.