Ponderable

Of course the Democrats would NEVER ever do something like this....pffft.
Take a gander at the Clinton Foundations & how giving they are...muahahahahaaa...
Of course what is posted above is illegal and the FBI is conducting an investigation?
The Koch Brothers have been indicted and convicted of __( E fill in the blank) .

How many Super-PACs has the CF donated to?

Maybe while you are searching for the answer you will stumble onto the CF for-profit channel to Hillary's bank account.
 






AA2thnK.img
e151e5.gif

The Washington Post

Inside Bill Clinton’s nearly $18 million job as ‘honorary chancellor’ of a for-profit college


The guest list for a private State Department dinner on higher- education policy was taking shape when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton offered a suggestion.

In addition to recommending invitations for leaders from a community college and a church-funded institution, Clinton wanted a representative from a for-profit college company called Laureate International Universities, which, she explained in an email to her chief of staff that was released last year, was “the fastest growing college network in the world.”

There was another reason Clinton favored setting a seat aside for Laureate at the August 2009 event: The company was started by a businessman, Doug Becker, “who Bill likes a lot,” the secretary wrote, referring to her husband, the former president.

Nine months later, Laureate signed Bill Clinton to a lucrative deal as a consultant and “honorary chancellor,” paying him $17.6 million over five years until the contract ended in 2015 as Hillary Clinton launched her campaign for president.

There is no evidence that Laureate received special favors from the State Department in direct exchange for hiring Bill Clinton, but the Baltimore-based company had much to gain from an association with a globally connected ex-president and, indirectly, the United States’ chief diplomat. Being included at the 2009 dinner, shoulder to shoulder with leaders from internationally renowned universities for a discussion about the role of higher education in global diplomacy, provided an added level of credibility for the business as it pursued an aggressive expansion strategy overseas, occasionally tangling with foreign regulators.

“A lot of these private-education guys, they’re looking to get into events like this one,” said Sam Pitroda, a higher-education expert who was representing a policy commission from India at the State Department dinner. “The discussion itself is irrelevant. . . . It gets you very high-level contacts, and it gets you to the right people.”

While much of the controversy about Hillary Clinton’s State Department tenure has involved donations to her family’s charity, the Clinton Foundation, a close examination of the Laureate deal reveals how Bill Clinton leveraged the couple’s connections during that time to enhance their personal wealth — potentially providing another avenue for supporters to gain access to the family.

In addition to his well-established career as a paid speaker, which began soon after he left the Oval Office, Bill Clinton took on new consulting work starting in 2009, at the same time Hillary Clinton assumed her post at the State Department. Laureate was the highest-paying client, but Bill Clinton signed contracts worth millions with GEMS Education, a secondary-education chain based in Dubai, as well as Shangri-La Industries and Wasserman Investment, two companies run by longtime Democratic donors. All told, with his consulting, writing and speaking fees, Bill Clinton was paid $65.4 million during Hillary Clinton’s four years as secretary of state.

Details of Bill Clinton’s compensation are found in the couple’s tax returns, which were made public by his wife’s presidential campaign and provide an unusual glimpse into the way a former president can make millions in the private sector. Bill Clinton has proved particularly marketable because of his global celebrity, enhanced by his foundation, his continued visibility on the political scene and his wife’s stature as a senator, Cabinet official and potential president.

The Laureate arrangement illustrates the extent to which the Clintons mixed their charitable work with their private and political lives. Many of those who paid Bill Clinton to consult or speak were also foundation donors and, in some cases, supporters of political campaigns for one or both Clintons.

Becker, for example, donated to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and last year donated $2,700 to her current effort. Laureate has given between $1 million and $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, according to the charity’s website, and made millions of dollars of charitable commitments through the Clinton Global Initiative, an arm of the foundation that arranged for corporations to make public pledges to their own philanthropic projects. Meanwhile, Laureate portrayed its association with the Clintons as a symbol of its legitimacy rather than the result of a business deal.

read more:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/inside-bill-clinton’s-nearly-dollar18-million-job-as-‘honorary-chancellor’-of-a-for-profit-college/ar-AAixfic?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp
 
Last edited:
http://legalnewsline.com/stories/51...-challenges-california-s-confederate-flag-law

"FRESNO, Calif. (Legal Newsline) -- A Fresno man created a Civil War painting and exhibited it at his county fair this year, but the painting prompted fair officials to contact the office of California Attorney General Kamala Harris because of concerns about it containing a Confederate flag."

"‘’The California AG office is a named defendant,’’ Pell said. ‘’Fair officials called the AG office for advice about this and they told the official that the display of Mr. Desmond’s artwork violated the statute.” "


Very dumb, way too much censorship. A fucking Civil War painting???
 
If you actually had read the report, you know how.

You still haven't provided any clue as to why you think the NTSB is at fault.
You still havenʻt provided any clue as to how much time was saved to create the additional profits that you claimed in the begining.
 
If you actually had read the report, you know how.

You still haven't provided any clue as to why you think the NTSB is at fault.
what makes you think I didnʻt read it? I was looking for the increase in profits attributed to modified maintenance procedures.
 
what makes you think I didnʻt read it? I was looking for the increase in profits attributed to modified maintenance procedures.

For someone who claims to be such a proponent of business, you sure don't know much about business.

You still haven't provided any clue as to why you think the NTSB is at fault.
 
For someone who claims to be such a proponent of business, you sure don't know much about business.

You still haven't provided any clue as to why you think the NTSB is at fault.
Iʻve never been a business proponent. I am a market proponent. I am actually a business opponent of subsidized companies and Industries.
 
Back
Top