Ponderable

tenacious said:
Oh shoot, not year. Meant to write seven million. As in $7000000 hard earned tax dollars...

As to the FBI director. What charges did he recommend? I only ask because I'd like to know what crimes he thought had been committed before that clown Goudy comes back asking for another 7 million of those hard earned tax dollars so he can continue his investigation.
Click to expand...

I gotcha...you trust Hillary.
The State Department reopened their investigation regarding her emails after the FBI stated she had not turned all of them in to the State Department...and don't forget the investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
 
Lion Eyes said:
I gotcha...you trust Hillary.
The State Department reopened their investigation regarding her emails after the FBI stated she had not turned all of them in to the State Department...and don't forget the investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

I don't think many people "trust" her, but faced with a Trump Presidency, it's a no brainer. The evil we know is a WAY better choice.

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item...the_wrong_thing_in_its_clinton_probe_20151025
 
Lion Eyes said:
I gotcha...you trust Hillary.
The State Department reopened their investigation regarding her emails after the FBI stated she had not turned all of them in to the State Department...and don't forget the investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

Do I really trust any politician? No of course not...

But again, I know her history. And it seems to me her record of trying to do right by the people she represented is pretty good. Certainly better then I'd say a lot of the small people around Trump have done.
As to the Clinton Foundation... hopefully you'll join me in encouraging her to help get rid of money in politics- starting with amending the constitution to fix the Citizens United Ruling. From the Kock Brothers and J Street, all the way to the Clinton Foundation... money has corrupted the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wez
tenacious said:
Do I really trust any politician? No of course not...

But again, I know her history. And it seems to me her record of trying to do right by the people she represented is pretty good. Certainly better then I'd say a lot of the small people around Trump have done.
As to the Clinton Foundation... hopefully you'll join me in encouraging her to help get rid of money in politics- starting with amending the constitution to fix the Citizens United Ruling. From the Kock Brothers and J Street, all the way to the Clinton Foundation... money has corrupted the system.
Click to expand...
She is the poster child for the corrupt system.
 
 
In other news... looks like the jig is about up for ol' Roger Ailes.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/sources-kelly-said-ailes-sexually-harassed-her.html
Sources: Megyn Kelly Told Murdoch Investigators That Roger Ailes Sexually Harassed Her

As a chorus of prominent Fox News women have gone public defending Roger Ailes against the wave of sexual-harassment allegations sparked by former Fox News host Gretchen Carlson’s lawsuit, the network’s biggest star, Megyn Kelly, has been conspicuously silent. Kelly’s refusal to join in Ailes’s orchestrated defense has led to speculation about why.

Now we have the answer. According to two sources briefed on parent company 21st Century Fox’s outside probe of the Fox News executive, led by New York–based law firm Paul, Weiss, Kelly has told investigators that Ailes made unwanted sexual advances toward her about ten years ago when she was a young correspondent at Fox. Kelly, according to the sources, has described her harassment by Ailes in detail.
 
I'm so shocked that a network founded on lies and hate, was run by a degenerate sexual harasser...
 
Wez said:
I'm so shocked that a network founded on lies and hate, was run by a degenerate sexual harasser...
Click to expand...
Muahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....

I'm sure that's why they are number one in cable....

Bless your little heart.

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"...
 
Lion Eyes said:
Really?
Edward George Bulwer-Lytton sounds like a judgmental pompous ass....is he someone you emulate?

Is that what they called Bill Clintons sexual harassment of women? Great entertainment for the unwashed ?
Click to expand...

Nah, had to look up who that was, I just think the term is funny and fitting.

Who is "they" in regards to Clinton, it's just me in here... I'm not defending Clinton, just because I'm laughing at Ailes and his bullshit faux news network.
 
Lion Eyes said:
Muahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.....

I'm sure that's why they are number one in cable....

Bless your little heart.

"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"...
Click to expand...


Number one in cable... sorta makes you stop and think what number one in cable actually means.

Let's just ignore that "first in news" must be qualified with "in cable news", and talk about what it means to be the most watched cable news. It seems to me that you see first in rating as some sort of assurance of quality? But that seems like a silly way to view success unless you work for Fox News. I mean Avatar is still the highest grossing movie, if we use your value system of financial success equating to quality product does that now make it the best movie of all time also? What if National Enquirer sells more copies then Time magazine... would would you say that makes them a better newspaper?

Secondly...
Isn't it funny that of all the people involved in the whole Monica Affair, that it was only Hillary that came out without a scratch. Bill got caught cheating. Newt the head of the republican revolution it was also revealed had been cheating. Hastert was molesting young boys. Bob Livingston in the Senate let Hustler magazine find some pics of him with one of his lovers and was forced to resign. But the lesson learned is this is somehow a mark against Hillary. Doesn't make any sense to me.
 
Don't even go down the road of "Family Values", self hating closeted gay Republicans, they are more common then sand on the beach.... (*cough*, Cruz, *cough)...

Obviously not a knock on gays, just a statement on hypocrisy...
 
Wez said:
Nah, had to look up who that was, I just think the term is funny and fitting.

Who is "they" in regards to Clinton, it's just me in here... I'm not defending Clinton, just because I'm laughing at Ailes and his bullshit faux news network.
Click to expand...
"They" would be the unwashed you spoke of...
So you have a problem with MSNBC and it's bullshit faux news network too?
Fox & MSNBC have reporters and they both have nuts from the fringe. Be it the far left or the far right .
You seemingly cast aspersions with those you disagree with. Perhaps that's just for our benefit here in the kitchen...
Folks need to be tolerant of those with different views.
I'm not against Hillary because she's a far left wing nut...it's her inability to tell the truth that I find repulsive.
 
Lion Eyes said:
So you have a problem with MSNBC and it's bullshit faux news network too?
Fox & MSNBC have reporters and they both have nuts from the fringe. Be it the far left or the far right .
You seemingly cast aspersions with those you disagree with. Perhaps that's just for our benefit here in the kitchen...
Folks need to be tolerant of those with different views.
Click to expand...

No my statement about FoxNews is based on countless hours of having watched both Fox and MSNBC. FoxNews reports very little actual news compared to the time they spend on editorial and opinion content. MSNBC you can actually turn on and get some news once in awhile.

That and FoxNews lies all day long, all day, every day. They have kept the Benghazi witch hunt alive, reporting lies that have been proven wrong by several bi-partisan Congressional reports. AGW deniers giving scientifically wrong information, IRS, Benghazi, it's an avalanche of lies, constantly.


Lion Eyes said:
I'm not against Hillary because she's a far left wing nut...it's her inability to tell the truth that I find repulsive.
Click to expand...

But you're ok with Trump, who is an even bigger liar?
 
tenacious said:
Number one in cable... sorta makes you stop and think what number one in cable actually means.

Let's just ignore that "first in news" must be qualified with "in cable news", and talk about what it means to be the most watched cable news. It seems to me that you see first in rating as some sort of assurance of quality? But that seems like a silly way to view success unless you work for Fox News. I mean Avatar is still the highest grossing movie, if we use your value system of financial success equating to quality product does that now make it the best movie of all time also? What if National Enquirer sells more copies then Time magazine... would would you say that makes them a better newspaper?

Secondly...
Isn't it funny that of all the people involved in the whole Monica Affair, that it was only Hillary that came out without a scratch. Bill got caught cheating. Newt the head of the republican revolution it was also revealed had been cheating. Hastert was molesting young boys. Bob Livingston in the Senate let Hustler magazine find some pics of him with one of his lovers and was forced to resign. But the lesson learned is this is somehow a mark against Hillary. Doesn't make any sense to me.
Click to expand...
Bill was also disbarred and paid a huge fine. He was also found in contempt of court...all on bogus far right conspiracy rumors.
Hillary destroyed the women who claimed Billy Bob molested or had affairs with.
Perhaps it's all in a name. Bill Clinton - Bill Cosby...nothing there. Right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top