Ponderable

[Bruddah IZ]

The lawyer in charge disagreed with your legal opinion.

Did he disagree with this?:

violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(emphasis added)

In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

The lawyer in charge disagreed with your legal opinion.

Did he disagree with any of this:

 

[Bruddah IZ]

And the hits just keep on coming.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

Over 3700 pages and that is your thought.

Priceless

FOIA disclosure? No prosecution after 8 top secret e-mails were sent on an unsecured server and you want to stand on 3700 pages of schedules that had "certain details removed" ?

 

[Bruddah IZ]

And why I would never vote for him.

Why?

 

[Bruddah IZ]

Exactly, only an idiot would forget why we have agencies like the FDA. Gotta love Libertarians and the magic free market fairy dust they try to sprinkle everywhere...

Fairy dust is for FDA sheep like you.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

And? A taxable corp would not pay taxes if it spent the money pretax and did not retain earnings. Heck, it is much easier for a taxable corp to get tax credits. Just ask GE or Boeing. or even Mr. Trump.

Speaking of GE and Boeing, once you get rid of corporate tax you could get rid of their exclusive tax payer funded Import/Export Bank.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

What you think is provocative is just the rework of an insurance company television ad.

Context and tone matter.

Origin matters more.

 

[Andy Dukes]

Did you read the article? Was it 3700 pages before or after they "removed certain details....." Kind of reminds me of a certain video. Don't you read what you post?

It was 3700 after they removed certain details, like meetings on national security. By the way the STATE DEPT was the one to remove material. If HRC removed things she would have made it 50 pages.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

This where I fell out with libertarians. In order to build any kind of an electorate, they had to include nonsense planks like these in their party platform. Despite the party's underlying theme of personal responsibility and people making up their own mind about things, the Libertarian Party (capital letters) requires candidates to swear to uphold the platform, even if they disagree with much of it.

Baaaaaaaaaa....lol. Who runs the FDA?

 

[Bruddah IZ]

It was 3700 after they removed certain details, like meetings on national security. By the way the STATE DEPT was the one to remove material. If HRC removed things she would have made it 50 pages.

50 pages of what?!!!! Hilarious! Keep reaching.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

I might pause if you said you were her schedule keeper. lol

 

[Bruddah IZ]

Did the lawyer in charge disagree with this?:

violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(emphasis added)

In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

Please explain.

Blacks have the highest unemployment rate.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

He's not able, don't bother.

Blacks have the highest unemployment rate. If they aren't employable at $10 an hour, what makes you think they will be at $15 an hour. C'mon finance guy with ten letters after your name.

 

[Andy Dukes]

Did he disagree with any of this:

No. He just did not find it was criminal.

 

[Andy Dukes]

50 pages of what?!!!! Hilarious! Keep reaching.

I take a swipe at HRC and you can't even see it.

 

[Andy Dukes]

Did the lawyer in charge disagree with this?:

violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(emphasis added)

In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.

He seems to disagreed that it was germane to this case.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

No. He just did not find it was criminal.

That's okay. That's what the law is for. Just in case lawyers don't find what they found.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

He seems to disagreed that it was germane to this case.

Right. There is no law against disagreeing. Obviously.

 

[Andy Dukes]

That's okay. That's what the law is for. Just in case lawyers don't find what they found.

That made no sense.