Ponderable

Andy Dukes said:
That made no sense.
Click to expand...

Does this make sense to you?:

violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(emphasis added)

In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
Does this make sense to you?:

violating 18 U.S.C. 793(f), which states:

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed . . . Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(emphasis added)

In criminal law, unless strict liability applies, a statute can require four distinct mental states (“mens rea”) to commit a crime: (i) purpose, (ii) knowledge, (iii) recklessness, and (iv) criminal/gross negligence.
Click to expand...
You seem to have an issue.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
The normal response from those that support liars. Which is the issue.
Click to expand...
I am conveying the fact of what Comey found. You seem to have an issue with that. You also have stated you don't find Comey lied in this case, so your continued reposting of a statue that you believe is important is not having the affect you are intending. That is if in fact you are trying to have an affect on this dialogue.
 
Andy Dukes said:
I am conveying the fact of what Comey found. You seem to have an issue with that. You also have stated you don't find Comey lied in this case, so your continued reposting of a statue that you believe is important is not having the affect you are intending if in fact you are trying to have an affect on this dialogue.
Click to expand...

You seem to have an issue.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
You don't have to read my mind if you stop ignoring the facts that Comey presented and the applicable laws given the facts.

Ignorantia juris non excusat
Click to expand...
But I didn't ignore the facts that Comey presented in his testimony and in his statement. I also did not ignore his opinion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top