Ponderable

I'm more likely to hurt or kill myself or someone else with a gun then use it in self defense, so I would be better off with a bat.
You obviously know your limitations Wez.....
Tell me, do you prefer a wood Louisville Slugger or maybe the aluminum Easton Mako Beast?
I understand they are both excellent for hitting and pounding.
 
Last edited:
First of all, I have guns, I grew up with guns in our home, so my kids were taught gun safety.
Part of that safety is if they come across a gun not to touch it and to tell an adult about it.
They were taught that guns are not toys & to respect the power that a gun has.
They were taught to consider every gun loaded and never point it at anyone unless they planned to shot that someone.
I never asked anyone if they had guns in their home.
They were taught when learning to drive that driving a car has a responsibility not to be taken lightly.
I don't worry about my dd's when they are out and about in a car.
I worry about drunks or some pin head not paying attention & running a light or stop sign.
With the number of guns out there, chances are kids will come in contact or sight of a gun. They should know gun safety rules.

My youngest dd asked me if she could go hunting with me.
I said sure. But to get a license she had to take a hunters/gun safety class.
She did, she loved it and she's ready to go.
I'll keep my eye on her when we are out with the weapons and continue to instruct her & instill gun safety & hunting preparations
I kept my eye on her when she played soccer, making sure she was prepared and was as safe as she could be.
That's all a parent can do.
Will you be traveling to one of the "hunting states"?
 
Again, it's other people acting the fool with a gun that I'm worried about. I own a gun, I'm not worried about that gun. It's been disassembled for 11 years. Strangely, I haven't needed it for self defense in those 11 years...
If you do need it, Im sure you can reassemble it in time.
I think its a good idea for everyone to disassemble, and lock up each part in a separate gun safe, then put each round of ammunition in its own protective safe as well. (possibly even only allow Disassembled ammunition, with strict government assembly codes).
 
If you do need it, Im sure you can reassemble it in time.
I think its a good idea for everyone to disassemble, and lock up each part in a separate gun safe, then put each round of ammunition in its own protective safe as well. (possibly even only allow Disassembled ammunition, with strict government assembly codes).
I wonder if Wez would be okay with us taking a disassembled gun and ammunition to the Surf Cup. Oh WTH, disassemble the magazine too.
 
They'll figure it out, I'm not shedding a single tear for the healthcare industry.
Do you ever use those ten letters after your name to inform your post on what the healthcare industry has to figure out? I mean jack assery is ten letters so maybe not.
 
Ignore it? I've restated it with my every response.

Follow along Lion, I'll go slow....

I have to drive to Surf Cup. Nobody has to bring a gun to Surf Cup. Someone is choosing to bring a deadly weapon that puts me and mine at an extra risk of injury or death....for what, for self-defense? Statistically you're more likely to kill yourself or an innocent, with that gun you are wearing...
Coocoo
 
It did fix the biggest problem our Country faced, millions of people left out in the cold with no healthcare. Now we can continue to evolve it to make it better instead of seek to destroy it at every turn, which is what has been happening.
Hey finance guy, what's the difference between healthcare and health insurance?
 
Were also talking about inheritance rights & the second amendment.

The California law that made some types of so-called assault weapons illegal made an exemption for current owners. The reason for that was pure politics. The weapons in question were prima facie illegal, and transfer of them to new owners tightly regulated. There is no "inheritance right" precedent for illegal acts.

The Second Amendment challenges to that California law fell flat in the courts.
 
The California law that made some types of so-called assault weapons illegal made an exemption for current owners. The reason for that was pure politics. The weapons in question were prima facie illegal, and transfer of them to new owners tightly regulated. There is no "inheritance right" precedent for illegal acts.

The Second Amendment challenges to that California law fell flat in the courts.




The so called "assault" weapons law was purely political at it's inception.
Which is why the owners of the guns will simply stop reporting their existence in Calif.
Of the thousands in Calif. now, how many do think are registered in the state?
How will the state know when a registered owner passes away?
Go to Arizona or Texas or Virginia or a majority of the states and these "assault" rifles are just ordinary semi automatic rifles.
 
The so called "assault" weapons law was purely political at it's inception.
Which is why the owners of the guns will simply stop reporting their existence in Calif.
Of the thousands in Calif. now, how many do think are registered in the state?
How will the state know when a registered owner passes away?
Go to Arizona or Texas or Virginia or a majority of the states and these "assault" rifles are just ordinary semi automatic rifles.

I'm not going to speculate on criminal behavior by people I don't know.

This may be the answer to some of your questions --

https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/regagunfaqs
 
Back
Top