Ponderable

espola said:
To no one's surprise, you don't know the difference between rate of interest and total interest paid.
Click to expand...
To no ones surprise, after fumbling the fact that borrowers can in fact choose APR's you now come back to solidify your ignorance by again avoiding the original question. You ask another question (the difference between rate of interest and total interest paid, whether monthly or after 30 years) that is answered by the amortization schedule link that Wez posted. Hee-haaaww!!
 
Bruddah IZ said:
To no ones surprise, after fumbling the fact that borrowers can in fact choose APR's you now come back to solidify your ignorance by again avoiding the original question. You ask another question (the difference between rate of interest and total interest paid, whether monthly or after 30 years) that is answered by the amortization schedule link that Wez posted. Hee-haaaww!!
Click to expand...

Still clueless.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
To no ones surprise, after fumbling the fact that borrowers can in fact choose APR's you now come back to solidify your ignorance by again avoiding the original question. You ask another question (the difference between rate of interest and total interest paid, whether monthly or after 30 years) that is answered by the amortization schedule link that Wez posted. Hee-haaaww!!
Click to expand...

Oh Brutha... doesn't look like I've missed much in here.
 
Can We Chill on Denouncing the Rich?

https://fee.org/articles/can-we-chill-on-denouncing-the-rich/

Hence, low marginal tax rates on high-income earners are desirable not because they need the money—but rather because WE need it, in the form of capital, which comprises investable funds. Only this creates plant and equipment that produce our smart phones and airliners and cruise ships making possible our vacations to faraway places our ancestors only a century ago couldn’t even dream of.
 
Wez said:
I thought you said you occasionally carry a gun to a soccer field...



So my family should, in addition to avoiding drunks, should additionally have to worry about the idiot in the bathroom stall next to us accidentally shooting his gun off?



Which is why I said, "I understand this is what laws and elections are for, just sayin."
Click to expand...

No I never claimed nor have I ever carried a gun to the soccer fields.
What I said was , there are folks that have permit to carry concealed weapons at soccer games and you never were aware of that.
If you choose to worry about a drunk idiot in a bathroom go right ahead. How many times a year does that happen? 42000?
Do you worry about being hit by lightning also?
Elections won't change the second amendment and the laws have been pushed about as far as possible regarding guns, and elections haven't helped in many places like Chicago.
Chicago has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country. They also have lawlessness, poverty, gangs, intercity strife and 75 years of Democrats running the city.

600 to 42,000....

There is a hit run in LA something like every 20 minutes.... 28,000 a year.
Be careful Wez....
 
Lion Eyes said:
No I never claimed nor have I ever carried a gun to the soccer fields.
What I said was , there are folks that have permit to carry concealed weapons at soccer games and you never were aware of that.
If you choose to worry about a drunk idiot in a bathroom go right ahead. How many times a year does that happen? 42000?
Do you worry about being hit by lightning also?
Elections won't change the second amendment and the laws have been pushed about as far as possible regarding guns, and elections haven't helped in many places like Chicago.
Chicago has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country. They also have lawlessness, poverty, gangs, intercity strife and 75 years of Democrats running the city.

600 to 42,000....

There is a hit run in LA something like every 20 minutes.... 28,000 a year.
Be careful Wez....
Click to expand...
Not only was he not shot at Surf Cup. Wez jr. took home the hardware. No danger there.
 
Critics frequently accuse markets and capitalism of making life worse for the poor. This refrain is certainly common in the halls of left-leaning academia as well as in broader intellectual circles. But like so many other criticisms of capitalism, this one ignores the very real, and very available, facts of history.--Steve Horwitz
 
Democratic socialism purports to combine majority rule with state control of the means of production. However, the Scandinavian countries are not good examples of democratic socialism in action because they aren’t socialist.--Corey Iacono
 
Local committees of the socialist party known as CLAP run a food distribution program. Angelina Garcia got a “solidarity bag” of food from the CLAP with a carton of milk, some beans, a bottle of cooking oil, corn flour, rice, and a bottle of guava juice. In order to get the single bag of food, she had to put her name on a list. You have to be a registered socialist to qualify for food.Then the party checked her family, her assets, and the number of rooms and bathrooms in the house. Three weeks later, she got her single bag of food.

It has to last her a month.

Not everybody can get food from CLAP. You have to be a member of the socialist party to qualify. Others are left to scrounge for whatever they can get. An unidentified man held up a bag of frozen fish heads.--Samuel Bryan
 
Lion Eyes said:
You keep claiming it's not a stock pond.
The state of Wyoming and now the courts through this ettlement disagree.
Click to expand...

The settlement uses the word "pond" sparingly, and the term "stock pond" not once. In the first paragraph of the Consent Decree: "...in connection with the construction of a dam and pond..."; and in the attached Mitigation Plan: "...the pond for some reason is dewatered..." and "fencing shall be placed on the north side of the pond...".

You may continue to quote client-serving statements by Johnson's lawyer if you wish, but you should at least recognize that that is what you are doing.

Since Johnson says he is going to stock the pond with fish, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department has this to say about why a fish pond is not a "stock pond": "Fences should be erected to exclude livestock. Livestock tend to congregate around ponds, trampling the edges, causing the banks to erode and muddy the water, degrading water quality and limiting the diversity and health of vegetation around the impoundment." Mr. Johnson's lawyer said (and you repeated) that Johnson's pond will improve the quality of water flowing through it.

https://wgfd.wyo.gov/Fishing-and-Boating/Private-Fish-Stocking/Constructing-a-Fish-Pond

As an interesting point concerning Johnson's rights to the water in the first place, the Wyoming State Engineer's Office has this to say in its Surface Water Regulations and Instructions, Chapter X Storage of Direct Flow Right, Section 2 Storage without Injury: "The most important provision of this law is that storage of direct flow rights must be accomplished without injuring or affecting any other Wyoming appropriator." That supports my conjecture that Johnson's neighbors are the most likely source of his troubles.

http://tinyurl.com/zwj6uek

 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top