Wez
DA
I recently posted an article critical of HRC. I can post something outside my partisan lean, can you? I challenged both you and BIZ to do so...so far you both have failed that challenge horribly.
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
I recently posted an article critical of HRC. I can post something outside my partisan lean, can you? I challenged both you and BIZ to do so...so far you both have failed that challenge horribly.
It's not a stock pond. For one thing, the man has no stock.
You know this man has no stock? How do you know that? Once again you are wrong.
You didn't even read the article. He has to build a fence to keep livestock away from the water.
The point though, he followed Wyoming regulations and was found in compliance of those regulations.
The EPA over stepped it's authority and stuck it's big fat face into business that does not concern them.
Your reasoning along with the EPA reasoning was flawed a year ago and it's still flawed today...
PS. He stocked it with fish......muahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa................
You know this man has no stock? How do you know that? Once again you are wrong.
You didn't even read the article. He has to build a fence to keep livestock away from the water.
The point though, he followed Wyoming regulations and was found in compliance of those regulations.
The EPA over stepped it's authority and stuck it's big fat face into business that does not concern them.
Your reasoning along with the EPA reasoning was flawed a year ago and it's still flawed today...
PS. He stocked it with fish......muahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa................
If there is a fence around it, and he is raising fish in it, then it is not a stock pond.
In what way did the EPA overstep their authority?
espoola
SILVER
Yeah! If they didndt overstep their authority, he wouldnt have to pay the hundreds of thousands in fines and interest to the feds, and he wouldnt be able to keep the pond they made him tear down!
Bruddah IZ
DA
If?
If you only had a brain....
Have your Visiting Angel read the article and explain it to you....
Johnson had originally constructed the pond to water cattle. The EPA informed Johnson that the pond, which is connected to Six Mile Creek south of Fort Bridger, was in violation of the Clean Water Act.
Johnson maintained that he had sought and received a permit through the State Engineer’s Office, which confirmed that the stock pond met all of the office’s legal requirements.
Perhaps in Wyoming you can stock fish in a stock pond.
Fact is, he's in compliance, and you're WRONG again....
more info:
“Importantly, under the settlement, the Johnson family’s pond will remain; they won’t pay any fines; they don’t concede any federal jurisdiction to regulate their pond; and the government won’t pursue any further enforcement actions based on the pond’s construction,” the legal team revealed.
“This is a victory for common sense and the environment, and it brings an end to all the uncertainty and fear that the Johnson family faced,” said Jonathan Wood, a staff attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation.
The fight began in 2013 when Johnson, under a legitimate state permit, built the stock pond to provide safer, more reliable access to water for his small herd.
Ray Kagel, a former federal regulator, explained how the pond proved to be a benefit to the environment. It created wetlands, habitat for fish and wildlife, and cleans the water that passes through it.
Last edited:
Bruddah IZ
DA
Wez
DA
Yes, BIZ, unlike you, I can actually back my claims up with proof. Please review comment #560 and revisit this attack upon my character.
Wez
DA
Please insert this response every time you divert from an actual answer and just start bleeting out HRC this and that...
Bruddah IZ
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Bruddah IZ
DA
Wez
DA
Prove it. Not going to hold my breath....
Bruddah IZ
DA
Wez
DA
Not lazy, I'm saying it doesn't exist, just like all your other false claims, please, prove me wrong.
Bruddah IZ
DA
Wez
DA
Lol, one word. I guess I was looking for a little more.... you never fail to be you BIZ.