Sheriff Joe
DA
Yes, I advised The Donald not release his tax returns just for that reason.
Ponderable
- Thread starter Bruddah IZ
- Start date
Sheriff Joe
DA
Appears and maybe is where you and yours have been living for the last year and a half.
Bruddah IZ
DA
If he was in to meritocracy he wouldn't be in to min wage.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Why stop at 15?
Read it and weep, tightwad.
Republicans Most Generous People In The World, Democrats: Not So ...
https://downtrend.com/.../republicans-most-generous-people-in-the-world-democrats-...
Sheriff Joe
DA
They didn't build that.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Why did you skip the stuttering Kenyan? He couldn't hold a private sector job to save his life, he is the ultimate spoonie.
Daffy?
Daffy is that you masquerading as Thurston Howell III ?
Good god lovey, I forgot what a pompous ass you can be....
Tough to get ones foot in ones mouth when one has their head stuck up their ass...wouldn't you agree?
It's great that your "business is incredibly stable".
It's a wonder as you seem to be over caffeinated, over opinionated and way out over your fricken ski's
So how many folks do you employee Thurston?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Classic,
McEnroe: No, I’m not going to apologize to Serena Williams
Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 6:01 PM
Top Pick
“It was not necessary.”
Give John McEnroe credit for unintentional grandmaster trolling this week — and for sticking to his guns, advisedly or not. The former number-one men’s tennis player bluntly responded “no” when the CBS This Morning panel asked him if he wanted to apologize to Serena Williams for remarks he made during an NPR interview, in which he speculated that the current top female player would rank “around 700” on the men’s circuit. On tour to promote a new book, McEnroe pointed out that his autobiography never brings up the topic, and that he was only guilty of an honest response to an off-topic question:
The hosts seemed aghast at McEnroe’s lack of remorse, although he did say that the exchange was “not necessary,” and that he’d rather talk about the book. (Even so, the panel kept at this topic for half of the segment.) A look at the NPR transcript shows that McEnroe has a point, and that Lulu Garcia-Navarro went out of her way to make a mountain out of a mundane observation:
Garcia-Navarro: We’re talking about male players but there is of course wonderful female players. Let’s talk about Serena Williams. You say she is the best female player in the world in the book.
McEnroe: Best female player ever — no question.
Garcia-Navarro: Some wouldn’t qualify it, some would say she’s the best player in the world. Why qualify it?
McEnroe: Oh! Uh, she’s not, you mean, the best player in the world, period?
Garcia-Navarro: Yeah, the best tennis player in the world. You know, why say female player?
McEnroe: Well because if she was in, if she played the men’s circuit she’d be like 700 in the world.
Garcia-Navarro: You think so?
McEnroe: Yeah. That doesn’t mean I don’t think Serena is an incredible player. I do, but the reality of what would happen would be I think something that perhaps it’d be a little higher, perhaps it’d be a little lower. And on a given day, Serena could beat some players. I believe because she’s so incredibly strong mentally that she could overcome some situations where players would choke ’cause she’s been in it so many times, so many situations at Wimbledon, The U.S. Open, etc. But if she had to just play the circuit — the men’s circuit — that would be an entirely different story.
McEnroe: No, I’m not going to apologize to Serena Williams
Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 6:01 PM
Top Pick
“It was not necessary.”
Give John McEnroe credit for unintentional grandmaster trolling this week — and for sticking to his guns, advisedly or not. The former number-one men’s tennis player bluntly responded “no” when the CBS This Morning panel asked him if he wanted to apologize to Serena Williams for remarks he made during an NPR interview, in which he speculated that the current top female player would rank “around 700” on the men’s circuit. On tour to promote a new book, McEnroe pointed out that his autobiography never brings up the topic, and that he was only guilty of an honest response to an off-topic question:
The hosts seemed aghast at McEnroe’s lack of remorse, although he did say that the exchange was “not necessary,” and that he’d rather talk about the book. (Even so, the panel kept at this topic for half of the segment.) A look at the NPR transcript shows that McEnroe has a point, and that Lulu Garcia-Navarro went out of her way to make a mountain out of a mundane observation:
Garcia-Navarro: We’re talking about male players but there is of course wonderful female players. Let’s talk about Serena Williams. You say she is the best female player in the world in the book.
McEnroe: Best female player ever — no question.
Garcia-Navarro: Some wouldn’t qualify it, some would say she’s the best player in the world. Why qualify it?
McEnroe: Oh! Uh, she’s not, you mean, the best player in the world, period?
Garcia-Navarro: Yeah, the best tennis player in the world. You know, why say female player?
McEnroe: Well because if she was in, if she played the men’s circuit she’d be like 700 in the world.
Garcia-Navarro: You think so?
McEnroe: Yeah. That doesn’t mean I don’t think Serena is an incredible player. I do, but the reality of what would happen would be I think something that perhaps it’d be a little higher, perhaps it’d be a little lower. And on a given day, Serena could beat some players. I believe because she’s so incredibly strong mentally that she could overcome some situations where players would choke ’cause she’s been in it so many times, so many situations at Wimbledon, The U.S. Open, etc. But if she had to just play the circuit — the men’s circuit — that would be an entirely different story.
Sheriff Joe
DA
Sarah Palin slaps the New York Times with a lawsuit – here’s why
She's still got it.
Sarah Palin is suing the New York Times for an editorial where they claimed she was the cause of the terrible shooting of then-Congresswoman Gabby Giffords by deranged gunman Jared Loughner. ( JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is suing the New York Times over an editorial that cause an online furor for suggesting that she was responsible for Jared Loughner attacking then-Congresswoman Gabby Giffords in 2011.
In the stunning opinion piece from the New York Times editorial board, they said the crazed gunman Jared Loughner was influenced by a map with gun crosshairs above electoral districts.
“In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot,” it read, “grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized crosshairs.”
Contrary to their statement, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Loughner ever saw that map, or that he was motivated by any political animus at all. He had become obsessed with Giffords long before the map was distributed, and he was found to be impaired by severe mental illness.
The New York Times later apologized and corrected the piece, but not before Palin took notice and lambasted them on her Facebook page.
“With this sickening NYT’s editorial, the media is doing exactly what I said yesterday should not be done,” she wrote. “Despite commenting as graciously as I could on media coverage of yesterday’s shooting, alas, today a perversely biased media’s knee-jerk blame game is attempting to destroy innocent people with lies and more fake news.”
“As I said yesterday,” she continued, “I’d hoped the media had collectively matured since the last attack on a Representative when media coverage spewed blatant lies about who was to blame. There’s been no improvement. The NYT has gotten worse.”
CNN’s Jake Tapper posted the first page of the complaint against New York Times that accused the newspaper of defamation.
She's still got it.
Sarah Palin is suing the New York Times for an editorial where they claimed she was the cause of the terrible shooting of then-Congresswoman Gabby Giffords by deranged gunman Jared Loughner. ( JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is suing the New York Times over an editorial that cause an online furor for suggesting that she was responsible for Jared Loughner attacking then-Congresswoman Gabby Giffords in 2011.
In the stunning opinion piece from the New York Times editorial board, they said the crazed gunman Jared Loughner was influenced by a map with gun crosshairs above electoral districts.
“In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot,” it read, “grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized crosshairs.”
Contrary to their statement, there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Loughner ever saw that map, or that he was motivated by any political animus at all. He had become obsessed with Giffords long before the map was distributed, and he was found to be impaired by severe mental illness.
The New York Times later apologized and corrected the piece, but not before Palin took notice and lambasted them on her Facebook page.
“With this sickening NYT’s editorial, the media is doing exactly what I said yesterday should not be done,” she wrote. “Despite commenting as graciously as I could on media coverage of yesterday’s shooting, alas, today a perversely biased media’s knee-jerk blame game is attempting to destroy innocent people with lies and more fake news.”
“As I said yesterday,” she continued, “I’d hoped the media had collectively matured since the last attack on a Representative when media coverage spewed blatant lies about who was to blame. There’s been no improvement. The NYT has gotten worse.”
CNN’s Jake Tapper posted the first page of the complaint against New York Times that accused the newspaper of defamation.
Hüsker Dü
DA
So they are afraid of Bernie so the go after his wife . . . just shows that Republicans go for the jugular. I wish Democrats were so cut throat, they are just too nice.
Hüsker Dü
DA
As with me you can't dispute the message is that what you are getting at?
Hüsker Dü
DA
When will the customer base dry up due to automation, perennial low wages and the lack of jobs that will entail?
Hüsker Dü
DA
Seems the "major new study" has a biased agenda.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...lly-working-just-fine/?utm_term=.d879e311f05f
Hüsker Dü
DA
Trying to position yourself as some kind of advice guru, once again? The fact you did poorly (as you stated) during the last 8 years while the market soared should have put the brakes on that idea.
Hüsker Dü
DA
I'm not going to pay to read lies that's for sure . . . why do you post such complete nonsense?
Hüsker Dü
DA
Fast food as we know it needs to disappear and be replaced by actual, real food, not food "products". I don't understand why anyone would eat that crap. Where's What is up? He use to brag about his dollar menu escapades. Hope he didn't keel over from clogged arteries.
Hüsker Dü
DA
Somebody had to, daddy isn't there to clean up little Donny boy's messes anymore.
Hüsker Dü
DA
It's not "capitalism" that is the problem, it's greed, unadulterated greed. Isn't greed a sin?