Ponderable

Wish you would just post a link and possibly a few paragraphs. When I'm reading on my cell these long opinion posts are murder on my index fingers since I have to scroll and scroll through them every time I want to read a new post.
There's an App for that.
 
What do you think of Bloomberg's idea that if Trump were to release his tax returns then we could be sure. I mean Trump didn't think up getting rid of NATO on his own. Foreign policy's not his thing. So where did the idea come from?

There is just something troubling going on with Trump and his relationship with Putin.

Trump and the Oligarch
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/donald-trump-2016-russian-ties-214116
"if Trump were to release his tax returns then we could be sure" of what?
 
I notice you didn't bother to actually point out an instance of dishonest (and please don't read this as an opertunity to cut and paste some rightwing hit piece that no one ever reads)... and instead went for the old crop duster attack on this one.
I've never used a crop duster....
Keep reading Einstein

"See Debbie Wasserman Shultz.
You know the head of the DNC that resigned the day before the convention?
Anything? Ring any bells?
That elephant in the room....collusion. Lack of neutrality.
The emails that wondered if Bernie was Jewish or atheist and if somehow this could be used against Bernie.
I guess that was common knowledge, nothing new here, move along..."
 
What do you think of Bloomberg's idea that if Trump were to release his tax returns then we could be sure. I mean Trump didn't think up getting rid of NATO on his own. Foreign policy's not his thing. So where did the idea come from?

There is just something troubling going on with Trump and his relationship with Putin.

Trump and the Oligarch
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/donald-trump-2016-russian-ties-214116
You have no proof of your fears...It's not like thirty years of Hillary's lies...right?
Did you happen to see this from The New York Times?
There is definitely something going on....with the Russians and the Clintons
Might explain why Putin was allowed to invade Crimea?
I'll post the link, I'm sure you know how to bring it up.... Enjoy!
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0
 
Last edited:
Fox loves the reaction they get from people who hate Muslims. They should of ran the piece and let a bunch of hate flow...
Crop dusting again...I'm your huckleberry.
Like Democrats love the reaction they get from people who hate cops.
They let a bunch of folks into their convention that showed hate towards police officers during a moment of silence.
 
Wish you would just post a link and possibly a few paragraphs. When I'm reading on my cell these long opinion posts are murder on my index fingers since I have to scroll and scroll through them every time I want to read a new post.

Hey speed reader...the link is posted at the bottom. It says read more: then the link is posted.
Perhaps you should put your phone down while your driving home.
There's nothing here that is that important....
 
Have the Clinton's released their tax returns?

Yes.

And the plural of Clinton is Clintons. Unless you are speaking of something belonging to one of the Clintons, in which case Clinton's would be appropriate, such as "here are Clinton's tax returns", or even better (risking the likely confusion in order to be thorough), if speaking of a possession of both of the Clintons, then Clintons' would correct, such as "here is the Clintons' 2014 tax return" -- https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2014_Form_1040.pdf
 
Yes.

And the plural of Clinton is Clintons. Unless you are speaking of something belonging to one of the Clintons, in which case Clinton's would be appropriate, such as "here are Clinton's tax returns", or even better (risking the likely confusion in order to be thorough), if speaking of a possession of both of the Clintons, then Clintons' would correct, such as "here is the Clintons' 2014 tax return" -- https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2014_Form_1040.pdf
There you have it folks. My editor hard at work. All for free. You lose India.
 
Yes.

And the plural of Clinton is Clintons. Unless you are speaking of something belonging to one of the Clintons, in which case Clinton's would be appropriate, such as "here are Clinton's tax returns", or even better (risking the likely confusion in order to be thorough), if speaking of a possession of both of the Clintons, then Clintons' would correct, such as "here is the Clintons' 2014 tax return" -- https://www.hillaryclinton.com/p/files/returns/WJC_HRC_2014_Form_1040.pdf

Ha ha ha

Part V of Profit or Loss from Business Schedule C

Computer Services $3,284.00
 
Page 1 Profit or Loss from Business Schedule C, William J. Clinton a consultant?!!!! Oh that's right. He and former Secretary of Treasury, Bob Ruben consulted each other to bail out Citibank in the Tequila Crisis 1 year before Bob Ruben went on, via the revolving door, to become a Citibank VP where he made a cool $20 mil in his first year at Citi. Thanks $lick Willy!!!
 
I've never used a crop duster....
Keep reading Einstein

"See Debbie Wasserman Shultz.
You know the head of the DNC that resigned the day before the convention?
Anything? Ring any bells?
That elephant in the room....collusion. Lack of neutrality.
The emails that wondered if Bernie was Jewish or atheist and if somehow this could be used against Bernie.
I guess that was common knowledge, nothing new here, move along..."

Umm... what's any of this got to do with Hillary?
 
Crop dusting again...I'm your huckleberry.
Like Democrats love the reaction they get from people who hate cops.
They let a bunch of folks into their convention that showed hate towards police officers during a moment of silence.

Starting a conversation about how you don't crop dust followed by a couple sentence making broad and generalized attacks on unnamed groups of "democrats"... sure makes it seem like you're cropdusting.
 
Umm... what's any of this got to do with Hillary?
Hillary is a Democrat.
Bernie believed he was getting hosed by the establishment.
Hillary is the Democrat Party, Debbie Wasserman Shultz is her wet nurse.
The released emails proved Bernie was getting hosed by the DNC.
Wasserman Shultz resigned the day before the convention, because she was complicit and untruthful.
She certainly was not impartial or neutral.
Umm capiche umm?
 
You have no proof of your fears...It's not like thirty years of Hillary's lies...right?
Did you happen to see this from The New York Times?
There is definitely something going on....with the Russians and the Clintons
Might explain why Putin was allowed to invade Crimea?
I'll post the link, I'm sure you know how to bring it up.... Enjoy!
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Well t's not just that Politico uncovered huge payments to Trump from a Russian Oligarch (http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/donald-trump-2016-russian-ties-214116). Its more that Trump has called for the end of NATO (http://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2016/07/trump-nato/492341/), asked Putin to help him get elected (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-clinton-emails.html?_r=0) mixed in with how he refers to Putin as a friend and someone he admires (http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/donald-trump-praises-defends-vladimir-putin/) that makes me think he can't be trusted.
 
Back
Top