Who said they hated her?That's a good question. I was moved by the story and very impressed at her taking this shot at 51.
Who said we are supposed to hate her?
Who said they hated her?That's a good question. I was moved by the story and very impressed at her taking this shot at 51.
Who said they hated her?
Who said we are supposed to hate her?
Which post?Multi sport, who seems to take personal offense at a 51 year old lady playing basketball
The issue is that nobody has a lab kit with them on the soccer field so if the situation arises you have no choice but to take the person or coaches word for it. The mere questioning of the legitimacy of fairness is considered bigotry.Having dome some very cursory reading on this, the science that exists today does point to 'more than a feeling' argument. Lots more needs to be studied, but there is scientific evidence of biochemical difference in a wide range of areas. Neurotransmitters have receptors that are triggered by sex hormones. Interesting read:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335177/
But you are right, this is not black & white, and ppl should seek to understand instead of condemn the unfamiliar. This is how progress is made.
sorry, the source doesn't pass muster w me...
Wow.Yes, is there something I should not be ok with?
Ok.. so now it's ok to prejudge a source.Sorr
sorry, the source doesn't pass muster w me...
How many girls have you tested on the field? I see lots of girls w masculine features on the field, should we test them? Look at NWSL, many athletes in that league don't exactly exude classic femininity. Should we all have a chance to examine them? Leagues allow players in, assuming they followed the rules like checking relevant documentation. Having anyone outside the governing body imply they're intitled to perform an examination on said athlete is simply unacceptable!The issue is that nobody has a lab kit with them on the soccer field so if the situation arises you have no choice but to take the person or coaches word for it. The mere questioning of the legitimacy of fairness is considered bigotry.
If its not bigotry who cares what some asshole thinks.The issue is that nobody has a lab kit with them on the soccer field so if the situation arises you have no choice but to take the person or coaches word for it. The mere questioning of the legitimacy of fairness is considered bigotry.
LOL - of course!!!! Every single thing you read you should see who wrote it & if it is considered a credible source, credibility is earned not assumed...Ok.. so now it's ok to prejudge a source.
Enjoy the evening............
HER, I think that distinction alone is where you lost your argument...Wow.
1. Unfair advantage
2. Would not want my daughter playing against him
3. Girls are not biologically built the same as men and some of the teeneage girls can get hurt.
4. He took away a roster spot away from a worthy girl.
But apparently in your PC world none of this matters.
Like equating deadly diseases with syndromes.
Hopefully none of us here on the forum actually have to see their daughter play against 50 man who is trying to relieve his glory days..
Why do you people try to make things so complicated? You over think and over analyze everything.HER, I think that distinction alone is where you lost your argument...
I think this would largely depend on the definition of the word 'transitioned'. If you stick to its classic definition, which is the same definition the medical community uses (as far as I know), it would imply that 'he' is no longer 'he' & is now in fact a 'she'... Some would argue that 'he' was never a 'he' in the first place & was simply born with a defect, kind of like a 6th toe...Setting aside those who are transgender, would it be fair to everyone involved to allow boys to start signing up and participating in girls' leagues? Maybe it would - I don't know. Although I think that going co-ed could lead to the near elimination of women in sports, something no one wants to see happen.
But if you do think it would be unfair, why does it become fair because someone transitions? I think that that is the basic question that lingers. Can someone answer that without calling me a bigot or claiming that I hate transgender people?
HER, I think that distinction alone is where you lost your argument...
'You people'??? J/kWhy do you people try to make things so complicated? You over think and over analyze everything.
Setting aside those who are transgender, would it be fair to everyone involved to allow boys to start signing up and participating in girls' leagues? Maybe it would - I don't know. Although I think that going co-ed could lead to the near elimination of women in sports, something no one wants to see happen.
But if you do think it would be unfair, why does it become fair because someone transitions? I think that that is the basic question that lingers. Can someone answer that without calling me a bigot or claiming that I hate transgender people?
One player = one player card... there are rules about playing for more than 1 team...Everyone is assuming it would be one what if the team was 6 transgendered ? Could a player play one weekend on the boys team and the next as a guest on the girls team? If you aren't allowed to question for fear of being labeled,as a homophobe or bigot then there is no control.
Everyone is assuming it would be one what if the team was 6 transgendered ? Could a player play one weekend on the boys team and the next as a guest on the girls team? If you aren't allowed to question for fear of being labeled,as a homophobe or bigot then there is no control.
Here are some numbers about % of general populations.Everyone is assuming it would be one what if the team was 6 transgendered ? Could a player play one weekend on the boys team and the next as a guest on the girls team? If you aren't allowed to question for fear of being labeled,as a homophobe or bigot then there is no control.