Name one man who has transitioned just for the financial benefit of being a woman
Bruce Jenner.
Name one man who has transitioned just for the financial benefit of being a woman
Yes! In this context I see no difference if you want to deny everyone w a diagnosable condition access to sports.Here you go. You are equating Cancer to being gender confused by posting the above. Dang dude..oops, maybe dang girl?
I guess were headed in this direction...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/12/california-transgender-woman-plays-college-basketball/
Here you go. You are equating Cancer to being gender confused by posting the above. Dang dude..oops, maybe dang girl?
I guess were headed in this direction...
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/12/california-transgender-woman-plays-college-basketball/
Some here are using god conveniently for personal prejudices. Instead of using religion to excuse the more banal prejudices that people harbor, those who believe in a god should use their faith as a motivator to be kind and do good!
You have no idea who I am... to post something like this just goes to show your ignorance.These are the same people that would have balked at their child playing with African American children in the 50s, and gay children in the 90s. Let's hope that with our children's generation comes more enlightenment.
You keep posting diagnosable condition as if that is supposed to mean something. It's not only ignorant to try and lump all, as you put it, diagnosable conditions together but I will guess that people with the "diagnosable " diseases of Cancer, Auto Immune Disease, Parkinsons the list goes on, would say that they are not even remotely the same as being gender confused.Yes! In this context I see no difference if you want to deny everyone w a diagnosable condition access to sports.
But my original comment had little to do w this specific issue, and more to do w those advocating one play the hand they're dealt...
Seems as though you "liked" Chargerfans post? So you too choose to judge people that you don't know?Some here are using god conveniently for personal prejudices. Instead of using religion to excuse the more banal prejudices that people harbor, those who believe in a god should use their faith as a motivator to be kind and do good!
Too funny, you are arguing something that you know nothing about and have no experience in.These are the same people that would have balked at their child playing with African American children in the 50s, and gay children in the 90s. Let's hope that with our children's generation comes more enlightenment.
Would "athlete's foot" have been more palatable to you? I use term "diagnosable condition" on purpose... seems that some people aren't able to see similarities in what we're discussing here...You keep posting diagnosable condition as if that is supposed to mean something. It's not only ignorant to try and lump all, as you put it, diagnosable conditions together but I will guess that people with the "diagnosable " diseases of Cancer, Auto Immune Disease, Parkinsons the list goes on, would say that they are not even remotely the same as being gender confused.
I also doubt that people that are battling Cancer and other such "diagnosable diseases " are overly concerned if they can, or if their kid can, play on a soccer team...
Simple answer. If the kid wants to play let them play in on their biological team. Curious though, when did GID become diagnosable?Would "athlete's foot" have been more palatable to you? I use term "diagnosable condition" on purpose... seems that some people aren't able to see similarities in what we're discussing here...
Simple question, are you ok allowing a kid w/ cancer/diabetes/autism/common cold/[insert condition of choice here] play soccer (assuming he/she is able/wants to)? If so, you should not disallow a kid w/ gender identity disorder same privilege... and note that it's not "gender confusion" as this implies they're somehow confused and perhaps some form of education/explanation would change that...
Simple answer. If the kid wants to play let them play in on their biological team. Curious though, when did GID become diagnosable?
Yes, is there something I should not be ok with?
when did either of you get your MD?You're quite right as it is not a medical condition.
GID (now known as Gender Dysphoria) was added to DSM III in 1980'sSimple answer. If the kid wants to play let them play in on their biological team. Curious though, when did GID become diagnosable?
Geeze. You are so angry you cannot even see that I am agreeing with you. I said gender is not black and white. That is why I brought up Caster and people wanting a sliding scale. Goodbye.Gender is not black and white. That's science and human nature. Why do you take issue with that?
GID (now known as Gender Dysphoria) was added to DSM III in 1980's
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_dysphoria
So, seems to me we're missing a whole league here...Simple answer. If the kid wants to play let them play in on their biological team. Curious though, when did GID become diagnosable?
You prove my point. The DSM is a book that describes all types of mental illness.