My daughter got her license last October, so yeah that's the risky thing I've let any of my children do.My dd drives both of us and the risk of us both dying is my greatest fear. I have zero zero fear that my dd will catch or die from this BS!!!
My daughter got her license last October, so yeah that's the risky thing I've let any of my children do.My dd drives both of us and the risk of us both dying is my greatest fear. I have zero zero fear that my dd will catch or die from this BS!!!
A dodge. Cute song.Be careful of what you ask for because you just might get it. I listen to this song almost daily to remind me not to get caught up in the rat race:
Fact Check: TRUEThis. Unfortunately, there are far too many people, likely fed by the doomsday media, that have Covid "tunnel vision" and are incapable of seeing the complete picture.
Life is full of risk and what-ifs, keep you kid at home, but don't force it on others.In my case it has nothing to do with the media. I’m just very risk averse when it comes to my kid. How can you be so certain? What if you are wrong, and your kid dies?
Again, well done.That's fair, and I don't blame you for doing what you think is best for your child. It sounds like your making a choice, but not trying to force your personal risk assessment on my kids and prevent my kids from being physically present at school. What I have a problem with is when others try to project their fears on my family's good faith choices.
Now to answer you question...nothing is certain in life. We all make our individual risk assessments. My risk assessment is based on actual data regarding very limited child infections (and virtually no serious health issues other than for health compromised children) and the lack of evidence for any material child spread of the virus...4+ months into the pandemic. I give pretty much zero credibility to any expert projections of the virus, its mostly pure speculation and time and time again has been wrong. By my very nature I'm just not a "what if" person without any current quantitative evidence that something is possible in the future. I'm also a skeptic by nature and give very little consideration for theories developed in a lab or other closed setting. I'm a "show me, don't tell me" type of person.
My kid dying is a pretty harsh question. My son is at far more risk driving him to practice, wading in a river fishing, launching himself 30+ feet on a bmx bike or doing backflips off any sort of surface or object known to man.
Best of luck to you and your child in whatever risky endeavors you and her undertake.
I’m all about stats. Look at total deaths coronavirus for ages 1-24 compared to total deaths.In my case it has nothing to do with the media. I’m just very risk averse when it comes to my kid. How can you be so certain? What if you are wrong, and your kid dies?
Elimination of the extra $600/wk in unemployment would change a lot of people’s opinions!This. Unfortunately, there are far too many people, likely fed by the doomsday media, that have Covid "tunnel vision" and are incapable of seeing the complete picture.
Bingo!Elimination of the extra $600/wk in unemployment would change a lot of people’s opinions!
So could you quantify what would be an unacceptable amount of risk for your kid to return to school?Life is full of risk and what-ifs, keep you kid at home, but don't force it on others.
So could you quantify what would be an unacceptable amount of risk for your kid to return to school?
Yes. If coronavirus in ages 1-25 had the same amount of deaths as suicides, murders, or unintentional deaths.So could you quantify what would be an unacceptable amount of risk for your kid to return to school?
Not the case at all. The threshold is how to minimize transmission of a virus that has greater morbidity and in instances greater mortality rates than the flu. Mortality is based upon the # of covid deaths divided by # of Covid cases. There is no vaccine unlike the flu, and greater hospitalizations across all demographics unlike the flu. Additionally, covid doesn’t have a “season “ unlike the flu. Meaning, transmission can and will occur regardless of weather. So, unless you are placing kids in a bubble and isolating them from their families they will not only contract the virus but be spreaders as well. To my knowledge, morbidity and mortality from vehicle accidents and playing soccer isn’t contagious. But maybe you know something I don’t. Comparing covid to the flu is irresponsible and become a political rallying point for some ridiculous reason. Personally, I wouldn’t want myself or my child to be a victim of either. But you do you.The minimum threshold for people worried about their kids is that it has to at the very minimum be more risky than the flu season (which for kids, COVID isn't), more risky than driving to school each day, and more risky than playing soccer (which we assume most people on this board let their kids do). We don't shut down schools every year when there's a bad flu season. Otherwise, people are being irrational. Danger of kids transmitting to the parents, as others have said, is a completely different story.....
I thought they were teaching because of how much they love helping children.
Not the case at all. The threshold is how to minimize transmission of a virus that has greater morbidity and in instances greater mortality rates than the flu. Mortality is based upon the # of covid deaths divided by # of Covid cases. There is no vaccine unlike the flu, and greater hospitalizations across all demographics unlike the flu. Additionally, covid doesn’t have a “season “ unlike the flu. Meaning, transmission can and will occur regardless of weather. So, unless you are placing kids in a bubble and isolating them from their families they will not only contract the virus but be spreaders as well. To my knowledge, morbidity and mortality from vehicle accidents and playing soccer isn’t contagious. But maybe you know something I don’t. Comparing covid to the flu is irresponsible and become a political rallying point for some ridiculous reason. Personally, I wouldn’t want myself or my child to be a victim of either. But you do you.
you are incorrect, mortality rate is not # of covid deaths divided by # covid cases. It's covid deaths divided by total people that had covid. Not everyone is getting tested and neither are the asymptomatic people. CDC even put out a new mortality rate that is similar to the flu. Even COVID deaths is up for debate, especially when we have health officials saying covid deaths doesnt mean the death was caused by COVID. Health officials even explained that even if someone had a week to live due to cancer and just got covid right now and died a week later, it will still be classified as a COVID death. The fact is 0 kids between 0-17 have died from COVID in california and hundreds of HEALTHY kids die from the flu every year. Thats with a vaccine available. make the old and sick stay home.Not the case at all. The threshold is how to minimize transmission of a virus that has greater morbidity and in instances greater mortality rates than the flu. Mortality is based upon the # of covid deaths divided by # of Covid cases. There is no vaccine unlike the flu, and greater hospitalizations across all demographics unlike the flu. Additionally, covid doesn’t have a “season “ unlike the flu. Meaning, transmission can and will occur regardless of weather. So, unless you are placing kids in a bubble and isolating them from their families they will not only contract the virus but be spreaders as well. To my knowledge, morbidity and mortality from vehicle accidents and playing soccer isn’t contagious. But maybe you know something I don’t. Comparing covid to the flu is irresponsible and become a political rallying point for some ridiculous reason. Personally, I wouldn’t want myself or my child to be a victim of either. But you do you.
All these theads eventually turn into this:
"effectively cannot reopen unless certain conditions are met: privately operated publicly funded charter schools are shut down"We can find alternatives to youth sports. There have been many good suggestions for replacing the physical part of club soccer, it's the social and emotional part that is a challenge.
But, the more serious problem is schools not reopening. Kids must have the structured daily academic environment that school provides, not only for continued learning, but also social and emotional needs...this is not easily replaced, not should it be. Kids have been out of school since early March, returing to school is a must. School is as essential, or even more so, as any Costco or Walmart.
The fact that not reopening schools is weakly supported, at best, by science and data should concern parents...but, the below fact that LAUSD has made school reopening contingent on political demands should set all parents hair on fire!
So you are saying they become entertaining?All these theads eventually turn into this:
Wow, could they be anymore tone deaf? Any bets on when we see, "Defund the Teachers"?"effectively cannot reopen unless certain conditions are met: privately operated publicly funded charter schools are shut down"
That is part of their ridiculous demands.
The reasoning for that one has to be that charters schools make the public schools bad in general. And especially in this environment if schools can do only online courses.
My DD goes to a charter school and when things shut down in March, they were immediately up and running with online classes every day of the week. They had online classes with every one of their teachers.
When I talked to the parents in our public school district, their kids basically got nothing.
That union is out for itself. It is not interesting in parents or kids. All about power and money.