Do you have your own private definition of "hysterical"?No, just not hysterical.
Do you have your own private definition of "hysterical"?No, just not hysterical.
Naw, either Oxford or Merriam-Webster works for me.Do you have your own private definition of "hysterical"?
No drama, just reality. You seem to think trumps undermining of the USA is funny. On the bright side I have friends all over the world who have offered refuge from the insanity they now think is America. I tell them things on the ground aren’t that bad, don’t believe the hype, there never was any “American carnage” no matter how badly the trump cult wants to make that happen for their dear leader.Sounds like we're running low on pitchforks and torches.
They, the trump cult, tear their hair out about trumps self inflicted legal dilemma then call pointing out the obvious, “hysteria”. That’s hysterical. Do they know we can see their games?Do you have your own private definition of "hysterical"?
So apparently they are as bright as you, ie the dimmest bulbs in the house.On the bright side I have friends all over the world who have offered refuge from the insanity they now think is America
you are a crack up, bless your heart.They, the trump cult, tear their hair out about trumps self inflicted legal dilemma then call pointing out the obvious, “hysteria”. That’s hysterical. Do they know we can see their games?
Less than four months after former President Donald J. Trump left office, the general counsel of the National Archives reached out to three lawyers who had worked with Mr. Trump to convey a firm message: The archives had determined that more than two dozen boxes of Mr. Trump’s presidential records were missing, and it needed the lawyers’ “immediate assistance” to retrieve them, according to an email obtained by The New York Times.Email Shows Early Tension Between Trump and National Archives (Published 2022)
The archives reached out to lawyers for the former president less than four months after he left office last year seeking help in recovering missing material.www.nytimes.com
Some people I am Auto-Ignoring, and some people I am just ignoring. My wife is much sweeter now.
Busy erasing all doubt....Silence is condoning.
FiveThirtyEight editor-in-chief Nate Silver made a claim on Twitter that’s getting a lot of attention, quite understandably.
Silver was commenting on Twitter on a Politico article about the Trump Administration pushing for fast-track approval of the COVID vaccine in 2020. It makes perfect sense that you would want to fast-track it, to help people as soon as it was possible.
Silver said, “‘Trump pushed for vaccine approvals too fast’ is the worst possible critique of the Trump administration’s COVID policy. That probably saved a lot of lives. If anything approval should have been faster.”
His next comment, though, was the barn burner. He said that “liberal public health elites” pressured Pfizer to “change its original protocols” and delay that vaccine approval, which “had the convenient side-effect of delaying any vaccine announcement until after the election” That action “deserves more scrutiny,” Silver declared.