How do leagues stack up?

Another aspect of this is what the kids and parents want. Even on top ECNL teams not every player is going to get or wants a Power 5 offer. See many players going ECRL and even DPL because they want the tier 1 activity on their college applications but don't want the time commitment or pressure playing top ECNL team. Many players pick Div 2, 3 or NAIA simply because they want to play. Plenty of good kids get Div 1 offers and may never see the field as they recruit 10 new players every year. Some kids want to play and go to school and enjoy it without overwhelming pressure.
 
Perhaps - but those same scouts are watching the same games, and there are two teams on the field. It's quite possible a standout player gets more visibility on a subpar top-league team than on a very good team not in that league. It's a given that that same standout player would get more visibility on a better team in the top league - but that's not the hypothetical option that's being considered here.
Also your kid can play for a great team but not get much playing time. Not going to get noticed if you are not on the field.
 
For your high school, is there one club team that a bunch of the players are from? That might be the best place to go. Of the HS teams I am familiar with, they all tend to have one non-acronym team that they get a cluster of players from. They have 2-3 stars from acronym teams, but the bulk of the players have to come from somewhere and the coaches like them to get reps together if possible.
Thank you, there was a team but the majority of the players graduated last year. Coach tried to rebuild this year but couldn't and decided at that age every year will be a re-build due to graduation so he has gone on to youngers.
 
If you look at the trends on the Soccer Ranking App, which is the most accurate ranking system available right now, the Leagues tend to correlate together in groups, with more overlap between leagues as you move down the list. I made this sheet to visualize how the Leagues are tiered under the different organizations and how the Leagues compare to each other. Each age group is slightly different; if you look ate the average trend, this is what it looks like. As a side note on the girls side, the GA teams in the Southwest have been in a slow decline in the rankings for 2007 and younger throughout this season. If the trend continues through spring and the summer tournaments, I predict the Southwest GA 2007 and younger teams dropping into a Tier 3 status next season. View attachment 15765
super helpful this is what I was looking for
 
Do you think strong EA teams are an Orange county thing? I can see kids from rich families not wanting to make the drive to LA to play on strong MLS next teams. College scholarship and professional opportunities mean nothing to these kids. So they tend to stay and play EA. As long as they beat MLS next teams in tournaments, they are happy.

I doubt this is measurable. But, IMO, quite the opposite from what I've seen.
 
I doubt this is measurable. But, IMO, quite the opposite from what I've seen.
Have you seen the college signing announcement of MLS next and ECNL clubs in orange county? I have to say if my kid goes to those schools, I would question my investment in soccer. Most of these kids don't get full rides. When families figure this out, and eventually they do, EA is looking all that better.
 
Have you seen the college signing announcement of MLS next and ECNL clubs in orange county? I have to say if my kid goes to those schools, I would question my investment in soccer. Most of these kids don't get full rides. When families figure this out, and eventually they do, EA is looking all that better.


I always find it amusing when parents take the line of thinking that dollars into soccer will yield some future financial windfall for their kids when the odds are so extremely low for anyone other than someone who is a true gamechanging talent (and even that's hard to predict given how non-linear most kids are in their development). If windfall is the motive, take the money, put it in a real investment and see real returns instead of playing youth soccer lotto.

The real "investment" should be in the lifelong lessons that sports teach:

Teamwork, sportsmanship, leadership, ambition, that you need to work hard and be dedicated to something to achieve your goals and how to push back in the face of adversity, among others. Or maybe even just the sheer love of playing the sport.

Anything else, scholarships, going pro, whatever, should be considered an unexpected bonus.
 
I always find it amusing when parents take the line of thinking that dollars into soccer will yield some future financial windfall for their kids when the odds are so extremely low for anyone other than someone who is a true gamechanging talent (and even that's hard to predict given how non-linear most kids are in their development). If windfall is the motive, take the money, put it in a real investment and see real returns instead of playing youth soccer lotto.

The real "investment" should be in the lifelong lessons that sports teach:

Teamwork, sportsmanship, leadership, ambition, that you need to work hard and be dedicated to something to achieve your goals and how to push back in the face of adversity, among others. Or maybe even just the sheer love of playing the sport.

Anything else, scholarships, going pro, whatever, should be considered an unexpected bonus.
Time investment sitting in freeway traffic. Kids need to ask themselves, if it wasn't for soccer, would I be going to those crappy schools.
 
Have you seen the college signing announcement of MLS next and ECNL clubs in orange county? I have to say if my kid goes to those schools, I would question my investment in soccer. Most of these kids don't get full rides. When families figure this out, and eventually they do, EA is looking all that better.

How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs? Either way you are playing games in San Diego, Inland Empire, OC, LA, Ventura, ect.. Appears to me that the leagues are playing roughly the same amount of games throughout the year, and traveling roughly the same places for games; with possibly an exception of the once a year trip to Phoenix and/or Las Vegas for those teams. If school is not a factor for you, and traveling is a big deal, it seems as though SOCAL NPL would be the best option. I really don't see a significant difference in the cost, time, and travel commitments between ECNL and EA. NPL on the boys side is playing at the same level as all of the above, with much less travel.
 
How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs? Either way you are playing games in San Diego, Inland Empire, OC, LA, Ventura, ect.. Appears to me that the leagues are playing roughly the same amount of games throughout the year, and traveling roughly the same places for games; with possibly an exception of the once a year trip to Phoenix and/or Las Vegas for those teams. If school is not a factor for you, and traveling is a big deal, it seems as though SOCAL NPL would be the best option. I really don't see a significant difference in the cost, time, and travel commitments between ECNL and EA. NPL on the boys side is playing at the same level as all of the above, with much less travel.
Usually higher level competition =s more possession and lower level =s more direct.

Possession takes more time to develop.

In the end it doesnt matter as long as your kid is having fun.
 
How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs? Either way you are playing games in San Diego, Inland Empire, OC, LA, Ventura, ect.. Appears to me that the leagues are playing roughly the same amount of games throughout the year, and traveling roughly the same places for games; with possibly an exception of the once a year trip to Phoenix and/or Las Vegas for those teams. If school is not a factor for you, and traveling is a big deal, it seems as though SOCAL NPL would be the best option. I really don't see a significant difference in the cost, time, and travel commitments between ECNL and EA. NPL on the boys side is playing at the same level as all of the above, with much less travel.
If OC MLS next and ECNL clubs can't send kids to good schools, why play MLS next or ECNL? I would just do EA 5 mins from my house.
 
If OC MLS next and ECNL clubs can't send kids to good schools, why play MLS next or ECNL? I would just do EA 5 mins from my house.

Maybe because MLS Next and ECNL are 5 min from their house. You didn't answer the question though. How are ECNL and EA different?
 
Usually higher level competition =s more possession and lower level =s more direct.

Possession takes more time to develop.

In the end it doesnt matter as long as your kid is having fun.

Nice statements, but none of them answer the question. How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs?
 
Nice statements, but none of them answer the question. How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs?
I have no idea which is higher level ECNL or EA in Orange county.

I could probabaly tell you which league is higher level by attending a few practices/games + watching how different teams play and/or are coached. Same principles apply. More possession generally =s higher level.

Boys are harder than Girls to determine competiton level because they're faster + tend to switch up style of play more quickly. Also a single dominate male player can be much more of a game changer than a single female player.

The magic and mystery of watching 8 years of competitive soccer from the sidelines.
 
Nice statements, but none of them answer the question. How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs?
The chief difference is that ea is where a lot of the mls next teams place their second teams. Those that don’t are aspiring mls next clubs. So some parents if they want to get their kids in front of the mls next coaches (whether from the same club or in scrimmages with other clubs mls teams) will lean ea. there are also some kids that get send down from the mls next teams and there may not be another mls next team in their area. The clubs use the ea as a feeder so the quality of the ea teams may vary wildly year to year and has nothing to do with coaching: it all depends on what the needs are of the mls next team (which will raid the ea team if necessary) and how many kids are battling to get from ea to mls next (which for a winning mls next team might be enough to produce a winning ea team capable of beating even lower mls next teams…see the strikers 08 teams for instance). Some of the mls next kids in turn are looking to get in front of the Galaxy and lafc.

ecnl has no higher division so those dynamics do not occur. To switch or get an academy look you are either going to try to swing a trial invitation or you are changing clubs to one in the mls ea system.
 
Nice statements, but none of them answer the question. How is EA any different than ECNL in terms of travel, the number of games, and the registration fee's/costs of the clubs?

From what I’ve seen there isn’t much difference in fees between EA and ECNL. In the SW division, there was only one away game in Vegas this year and none in Arizona. It‘s travel to the showcases and playoffs that gets expensive for ECNL but that’s also where a lot of the college exposure comes from. For most boys, that won’t be meaningful until U17.
 
The chief difference is that ea is where a lot of the mls next teams place their second teams. Those that don’t are aspiring mls next clubs. So some parents if they want to get their kids in front of the mls next coaches (whether from the same club or in scrimmages with other clubs mls teams) will lean ea. there are also some kids that get send down from the mls next teams and there may not be another mls next team in their area. The clubs use the ea as a feeder so the quality of the ea teams may vary wildly year to year and has nothing to do with coaching: it all depends on what the needs are of the mls next team (which will raid the ea team if necessary) and how many kids are battling to get from ea to mls next (which for a winning mls next team might be enough to produce a winning ea team capable of beating even lower mls next teams…see the strikers 08 teams for instance). Some of the mls next kids in turn are looking to get in front of the Galaxy and lafc.

ecnl has no higher division so those dynamics do not occur. To switch or get an academy look you are either going to try to swing a trial invitation or you are changing clubs to one in the mls ea system.

I really think that the idea of EA being a feeder for MLSN and ECRL being a feeder for ECNL is a bit of an empty sales pitch. Players are just as likely to be recruited from outside.
 
I really think that the idea of EA being a feeder for MLSN and ECRL being a feeder for ECNL is a bit of an empty sales pitch. Players are just as likely to be recruited from outside.
Yes BUT: 1) that doesn’t stop the parents from falling for the sales pitch and 2) it’s dependent on the needs on the mls team….depends on how the mls team is stacked: some mls teams have a long line of players interested, others for whatever reason do not and in any case that leaves a smaller pool of top talent available for the ea team once the mls team has first pick.
 
They always say ecnl, mls next, ga or whatever top league it is those players/family spend a lot but my question is do you really pay less if your kid plays on lower leagues? hmmm In our soccer journey the only time it was not expensive when my kid played in core ayso because it was pure volunteer. Even ayso select and extra is expensive. I think you spend the same amount of money. I say regular club teams go on at least 6 tournaments a year. I think most of SW ECNL teams goes to at least 6 tournaments also 2-3 ecnl showcases and 3 local tournaments. So is it really more expensive to play in top leagues???
 
Back
Top