LadiesMan217
GOLD
Carlsbad U18 was a finalist. Carlsbad U16 won the championship. You are correct about life moving on.
Cool.
Carlsbad U18 was a finalist. Carlsbad U16 won the championship. You are correct about life moving on.
The USYS reps at the field were OK with it and told the coaches they didn't need to change the manner in which the game was being played. If you have an issue with that, funnel your angst at the USYS, not the Carlsbad team that did nothing wrong and rightfully earned their place in the semi finals while denying nobody anything.
Yes, the story that came out afterwards was embarrassing to the rest of the USYS board that was not present at the game, so they responded to the media attention as they did. Their finding of no collusion is the key. Their final statement that they will look into rule changes to prevent this from happening will be interesting to see and even more interesting to see how it's enforced and when. A "perceived effort" rule will present all kinds of challenges, don't you think?
Regardless of appearances, Carlsbad did nothing wrong here and rightfully moved on to the semi finals.
What would you do?
What would be your justification for doing it?
You don't like what happened. So if you were the person in charge of USAYS what would you do?I don't understand your question.
You are missing the point. Again.
Both teams conspired to take an opportunity to advance away from another team by failing to play the game. If that isn't match fixing, I don't know what is.
You think it's fine and no big deal. Great. I disagree, and I would have pulled my kid from the team after the game.
I got that too when DD made it to the finals in G19 and held a clean sheet through the full 90. There was not a G19 ECNL team in the Nation that could come close to beating them, or even making it to the finals.People still call it a "National Championship" when all the top teams are in ECNL?
...
I don't even know who he is. I've officiated and seen combined over 1,000 games I see stuff like this and find it interesting. And I was surprised by the accusations of a sports media reporter. There may have been an act that was wrong, I just didn't see evidence for it. Certainly not from a laws of the game perspective.
I'm pretty sure every team playing olders at Nationals has some forward that knows how to sell a call, and get some refs to make a call that they would not otherwise have made. And everyone on that team benefits. So those against it, just should not play at that level. For me - I see soccer as a competition. Competitors are supposed to win. If they can win not breaking rules, not hurting someone physically or mentally - they should be creative. I do not see the value in bringing arguments into the game that make touching a ball with a hand, or not kicking it somehow a reflection of character. Kids play by the laws - the referee decides. And the rules - the tournament people decide. And win - not at all costs. At the cost of training more, getting on a better team and being smart about it. If you live in SoCal you have choices - and it may cost time and money where you drive.
Likely for another thread... I don't think my win attitude is an issue at all. It is in fact the point of sport. Once you win you get to keep playing someone better until you loose. That is how it goes.
What I think is wrong with soccer is not a win at all cost attitude. I think it is sports in college and the drive to chase a sport for money/college. I'm an advocate of taking advantage of it because it is there, but that drives this huge club industry/lottery.
Wow, you don't get it. YOU are missing the point. Conspiracy means they planned it out and agreed to do it together = FALSE. I have heard what their instructions were before the game and at halftime.
You say an opportunity for another team to advance was taken away = FALSE. Just because there is still a mathematical chance does not mean it's really a chance. 4 goals. FOUR! Carlsbad had to win by FOUR for the other team to go.
I have nothing more to say to you if you're still hung up on these most fundamental untruths. Good luck to you and your player in ECNL. Oh, pretty classy quote from one of your earlier posts: "People still call it a "National Championship" when all the top teams are in ECNL?" You're pretty transparent with that huge ECNL banner. And you talk about respect when you spew that kind of disrespect? You'd fit right in with SDA if you move to Syracuse, screaming about disrespecting the game while swearing at kids.
Why did you quote me?You heard the instructions before the game and at halftime? I have been to hundreds of games and never heard the coaches instructions. Were you in the huddle with the girls? BS, these coaches don't let the parents hear anything; I know that first hand.
You heard the instructions before the game and at halftime? I have been to hundreds of games and never heard the coaches instructions. Were you in the huddle with the girls? BS, these coaches don't let the parents hear anything; I know that first hand.
......A "perceived effort" rule will present all kinds of challenges, don't you think?......
Maybe if they all looked Annoyed...I sure hope they don't make this something that referees have to enforce. It would just be another reason for people to yell at the referee.
The worst sideline soccer parent I have ever seen was the parent of a Syracuse goal keeper. We were playing against them in the 2013 National League in NC. He was literally cussing at his daughter from the sideline, saying things like "God Dammit!, get your body behind the ball!" and "What the hell!". She was visibly stressed. It was all I could do to not tell him to STFU and I still wonder if I should have done something. Is it something in the water?
Mistake. Sorry.Why did you quote me?
Gotcha.No, from my daughter. Who was just a guest here, and very young, so certainly no reason to not tell me the truth. As a parent also trying to figure out how the game played out that way, I simply asked her.
Wow, you don't get it. YOU are missing the point. Conspiracy means they planned it out and agreed to do it together = FALSE. I have heard what their instructions were before the game and at halftime.
You say an opportunity for another team to advance was taken away = FALSE. Just because there is still a mathematical chance does not mean it's really a chance. 4 goals. FOUR! Carlsbad had to win by FOUR for the other team to go.
Maybe you skipped over my last post (they are the .1%) or maybe you underestimate the brains of 17/18 year old women.Without some sort of planning or instruction, kids would NEVER have played this way.....