Not really sure why you feel the need to interject yourself into a conversation that you are not a part of and not sure why you are insisting that Boys 2009s are boys 2011s. You clearly misunderstand the argument. It was a boys 2009 team, I think we can all agree. The poster that I responded to said they were boys 2011. (you could just scroll back up and see for yourself....and then send me an apology). Yes, they are ten, going on 11 year old boys but by definition, they are not Boys 2011s. What is so hard about that to understand? What are you getting by insisting otherwise? Like I said originally, turns out it was much ado about nothing. Two boys got into a fight, a guy grabbed his backpack, and grown adults panicked. It is what it is. When I was a kid, we fought all the time. Now days, it is so rare that people don't even know what to do or how to react.