Long day at the office today. I'm tired. Let's have a good "Throw Back Thursday" tomorrow. Throw what ever you want at me. I have so much to throw back it shall be a fun day 
Jellybelly’s point was that there isn’t data to back up the claim that more ACL injuries happen in the last 5 minutes of the game. I agree. You are attempting to extrapolate a loooonnngggg way here. From injury risk to injury, from hamstring strain to ACL tear, from pro to youth, from statistically insignificant to significant. Even if there was clear science to show that ACL tears are more frequent in the last part of a game, how do you know that subbing practices are significantly different from one league to the other? Doesn’t it seem that the top players usually play full games regardless of whether there are sub rules in their league to prevent re-entry or not?
You feeling something is fairly obvious is much different than having well established science to support it.
Does either league keep stats on ACL injuries?
You have posted numerous times referencing ACL risk as it pertains to DA vs ECNL vs HS vs other. You have also posted your sources on occasion (I've read them all.) No doubt, female athlete ACL injury rates are alarming and we should do everything possible to reduce those rates. Unfortunately, you have consistently drawn false conclusions from the sources you've listed, many of which were poorly designed or small case studies from which no conclusions can be drawn. Having said that, I'd like to see your source in reference to your claim about the increased rate of ACL injury in the final 5 minutes of each half. Please post it. Cheers to you in advance if your data are solid and actionable. Needless to say, I am dubious. Regardless, extrapolating any such data to DA v ECNL v HS is ludicrous unless ECNL and HS coaches are resting every player every half (which, of course, they are not.)
Neil deGrasse (smart dude): "It is okay to not know. But when you don't know, yet think you know, and wield power in that ignorance, it's a recipe for disaster."
This is factually correct. There is data from many sources that shows that the risk of injury increases significantly at the end of each half. Substitution rules that limit subbing and prevent coaches from getting players off the field at the end of the half ultimately increase the likelihood of players getting hurt. There's really no reason to treat youth players like professional players.
Wow! That’s some serious scrilla, scratch, paper my friend. I have a question for those who say their goal is only college.I just counted on my 10 little fingers ten girls my dd played with or against that have torn ACLs. I just counted 10 other girls who have quit soccer altogether. Last of the 1 minute 10 count, I know 10 other girls who had or have concussions and 10 other girls who have or had depression, broken knee cap, broken wrist and so on. That took me less the(a)n 1 (one) minute to do just now. Theirs your're're're're test. These girls were abused (not all) and over worked and their older sista's who had gone before them have been treated like poop from the pimps and pricks who have been running the show in some places. Favoritism, being yelled at, groomed, Lied too on numerous occasions ((big lies too)), tricked, deceived, played, blacklisted, black balled among some of the threats. Also, manipulated to "shoot for the stars" and go pro ((all in, full time, everyday, all day soccer)) at a cost of $15,000 to the pay to play customer ((99% of us)) (according to Hope Solo). Times (x) 4(for, four, fore) years equals(=) $60,000 to pay and play so you can tell everyone your dd is participating in the G D A league, that is full of Elitist who think there life is better then every one else. If your dd can escape major injury ((just like some have just escaped their SAT score pressure)), she get's to go play in college. Most of us will have to pay to play in college two. Nothing wrong with that. No full rides in college just like no full rides at Beach. Well, maybe one or two true Unicorns get the full ride in college. $ixty thousand big ones to risk all these injuries, bad apples, pitfalls & dangers just to help the top top .1% of the goats get on the YNT and go pro? If your dd made the YNT congratulations. You also owe all of us one big "Thank You" for making us travel around the country promoting this circus. All for the .1%ters. Your welcome btw. However, I'm second guessing my decisions more & more as I sit in my house all day and all night wondering how the hell all this happened. Play local so we can all stay & play local. Locals only!!!!!!
I'm one big tagline and it just runs and runs. Imagine if I was able to actually talk when I was 5? I would have been moved up a few class levels I bet because I'm actually not dumb. I had one asshole who ran a company I helped grow. He paid me well but he always told me I didnlt do much after I got everything set up for his business with all my ideas. he would tell me, "Your just an ideas guy." WTH, just a guy with some ideas in his brain that roll out of my mouth every second.Wow! That’s some serious scrilla, scratch, paper my friend. I have a question for those who say their goal is only college.
How is paying 60k over 4 years to enhance your kids chances of getting into college any different than the other parents that were buying test scores etc. in the admissions scandal?
How do the ACL studies account for non contact versus contact based ACL injuries?
Valid point. What does ECNL cost?So ECNL is free and there's no travel with associated costs? Pay to play is not a GDA issue, it's a club soccer issue.
ECNL never said it was free. No got free unless you needed help. GDA said it would be fully funded and not just for one year and be grateful. You paid for a service at ECNL. It wasn;t $60,000 either. Map said it was $33K back in the day. That's still pay to play, just now it cost way more because of all the travel.So ECNL is free and there's no travel with associated costs? Pay to play is not a GDA issue, it's a club soccer issue.
Agreed, ECNL and DA costs are more alike than different. DA was not supposed to be that way, as originally described/marketed by US Soccer and the clubs, hence some of the frustration. I never bought into that line of thought, so that component of the DA bothers me not.So ECNL is free and there's no travel with associated costs? Pay to play is not a GDA issue, it's a club soccer issue.
First off smart man ((Just having fun)) great job not falling for the trick like I did. This is all about college for your dd. Hope Solo said poor folks can;t enter club soccer. It's like an old white man's country club that gets so many favors that their kids get all the glory still and poor kids can;t enter the league. When you pay to play, the one's you pay make sure you get to play and start and receive all the benefits of what the league can offer. There lies the problem dude. Thirdly, some coaches and docs ((not all) get paid way too much. If your rich dad, who cares right? Fourth, the top top players need to be protected from all of you who love pay per play for obvious reasons and let the top top play for free and with only the other top top goats only. Play possession and the right way can only be plaid with the top top players. Last, i'm so glad that @Dos Equis received values for his investment in the pay per play leagues. I did not and mine was free. Imagine that. A poor American father with a half Guatemalan dd getting a full ride by the #1 GDA club in America that told everyone on their website to donate more of the rich money so we can play for free while dads like you pay for it. I get this now. If the poor dad has some issues, he needs to shut because it's all free.Agreed, ECNL and DA costs are more alike than different. DA was not supposed to be that way, as originally described/marketed by US Soccer and the clubs, hence some of the frustration. I never bought into that line of thought, so that component of the DA bothers me not.
Pay to play is not a club soccer issue -- club soccer is a choice, and that it costs money to run a club is a reality. Even if you eliminate all but local travel, someone has to pay coach salaries (generally 2/3 of a club's budget), field and equipment (another 10-25%), uniforms, referees ... the issue is a few people want someone else to pay for their child. Perhaps they think their child somehow deserves a free ride, or that US Soccer, MLS, NWSL are flush enough that they should pay the costs of those players deemed worthy of developing, like the boys DA. Or perhaps coaches should work for free and local municipalities and clubs should build and maintain enough fields for every user group to have free access.
Someone has to pay for these kids to play. I have generally felt I have received value for that payment, but understand not all do.