Yes, I think pay-to-play at times creates weak self entitled adults. ECNL is suppose to be competitive. Losing is part of competition. Why do folks feel just because they pay, their kids get to play in a competitive environment? This is why I think club soccer is essentially “affirmative action” for the rich; because every player is a winner so long as moms and pops has enough scrilla, scratch, paper to make it happen. Pure unadulterated fuckery!
The primary benefit that ECNL should provide is a competitive environment to learn team tactics. However, the vast majority or ECNL and D1 college teams that I have seen play are technically inept. Could you please explain how a group of technically inept folks can learn tactics and be competitive?
So for me, it’s not about the smaller clubs taking on people that have failed to develop technically and/or lack physicality. For me, it’s about being honest and telling these folks that they are not good enough so that they can move on and find something they are good at.
It’s been said that” those that can, do and those that can’t, teach.” So, based on my observations we should have lots of female coaches in the future.