Climate and Weather
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
Whats that mean?
Arrhenius formula for greenhouse effect -- thermal forcing is proportional to the natural logarithm of the ratio of increase in CO2 concentration.
That's all you're worth.
That has nothing to do with the graph you posted it with.
That graph deals with a different "driver", so to speak.
It's a rebuttal.
Do you believe the greenhouse theory is comprehensive enough to over shaddow every other dynamic within our climate system?
Multi Sport
DA
Multi Sport
DA
He does. He loves to post stuff from back when he was born.
Whaddaya got?
Multi Sport
DA
Classic... answer a question with a question. And a lame one at that...
Take a look at the Tallbloke link.
The sun doesnt rise and set on the greenhouse theory.
The earth has its own checks and balances in play, and the sun just may be conducting the orchestra.
Multi Sport
DA
I had no idea you were now checking guys underwear as well..
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...r-player-forced-change-blue-underwear-umpire/
You have well rehearsed. Maybe you can get a paying gig.
I have a paying gig, protecting the health of the nation.
From the bottom down.
Wez
DA
Huge difference between Scientific studies eventually proved wrong by further research and experimentation, and political opinions based on no research or experimentation.
From wiki,
"In his calculation Arrhenius included the feedback from changes from changes in water vapor as well as latitudinal effects, but he omitted clouds, convection of heat upward in the atmosphere and other essential factors. His work is currently seen less as an accurate quantification of global warming, than as the first demonstration that increases in atmospheric c02 will cause global warming, everything else being equal."
In other words, he left out the major checks and balances, known, and unknown, and is left with a theory that works most of the time under controlled laboratory conditions.
"In his calculation Arrhenius included the feedback from changes from changes in water vapor as well as latitudinal effects, but he omitted clouds, convection of heat upward in the atmosphere and other essential factors. His work is currently seen less as an accurate quantification of global warming, than as the first demonstration that increases in atmospheric c02 will cause global warming, everything else being equal."
In other words, he left out the major checks and balances, known, and unknown, and is left with a theory that works most of the time under controlled laboratory conditions.
Sheriff Joe
DA
You are just a crazy denier.