Climate and Weather

[Sheriff Joe]

You're avoiding the question. What special insight or scientific knowledge do you have to make such a conclusion on a topic as complex as Climate Science?

I had science in elementary, jr high and high school. Does that suffice?

 

[Wez]

I had science in elementary, jr high and high school. Does that suffice?

No. I had that as well and even took some Science in college and don't feel qualified to make such a conclusion as you have. Why do you feel so qualified?

 

[Sheriff Joe]

No. I had that as well and even took some Science in college and don't feel qualified to make such a conclusion as you have. Why do you feel so qualified?

It is called an opinion, just as valid as any of these left wing kooks scientists' opinion. Correct? After all that is exactly what this all is, someones' opinion.

 

[Sheriff Joe]

You're avoiding the question. What special insight or scientific knowledge do you have to make such a conclusion on a topic as complex as Climate Science?

Can you please answer my question now?

 

[Bernie Sanders]

Current events






http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icethickness/thk.uk.php …

 

[Wez]

It is called an opinion, just as valid as any scientists' opinion...

...and there's the problem.

 

[Sheriff Joe]

...and there's the problem.

I don't see it, where?

 

[Wez]

I don't see it, where?

Because you view AGW as a political discussion, you hold your opinion on the Science, the same as people who have PhDs and actually work in the Scientific field.

 

[Bernie Sanders]

Because you view AGW as a political discussion, you hold your opinion on the Science, the same as people who have PhDs and actually work in the Scientific field.

It is a political discussion.

 

[Wez]

It is a political discussion.

It can be, but I was careful to focus only on the Science.

 

[Bernie Sanders]

It can be, but I was careful to focus only on the Science.

Good grief.

 

[Sheriff Joe]

Because you view AGW as a political discussion, you hold your opinion on the Science, the same as people who have PhDs and actually work in the Scientific field.

BUT, we are still working off of someones' opinion, right?

 

[Sheriff Joe]

Because you view AGW as a political discussion, you hold your opinion on the Science, the same as people who have PhDs and actually work in the Scientific field.

Have you ever disagreed with a professional in any subject that you are not educated in or familiar with?

 

[Sheriff Joe]

It can be, but I was careful to focus only on the Science.

It depends on what the meaning of is is.

 

[Wez]

Good grief.

I know it sounds silly, but it's really the problem when it comes to AGW discussions.

People who view the topic only as political, feel their opinion on the politics (left vs. right) is as valid as Scientists opinions on the Science. They pollute the discussion by crossing the streams.

 

[espola]

I see the monthly court of denial is in session.

 

[Bruddah IZ]

I see the monthly court of denial is in session.

Are you not convinced by the 97% consensus?

 

[Bruddah IZ]

I know it sounds silly, but it's really the problem when it comes to AGW discussions.

People who view the topic only as political, feel their opinion on the politics (left vs. right) is as valid as Scientists opinions on the Science. They pollute the discussion by crossing the streams.

Maybe you should try convincing the 97% that the governments subsidies to the fossil fuel industry are a bit counter productive. But then they wouldn't be able to subsidize your boy Musk whos company relies on the fossil fuel industry.

 

[Bernie Sanders]

Current events.


http://beta.dmi.dk/en/groenland/maalinger/greenland-ice-sheet-surface-mass-budget …

 

[Sheriff Joe]

So Arpaio nut hanger, do you believe there is a chance mankind is speeding up Global Warming?

Dr. Wezdumb, do you believe there is a chance that humans are NOT contributing to global warming/ climate change/ global cooling? I don't know which phrase fits your narrative at this moment, pick one.