Climate and Weather

Speaking of conspiracy, as usual, Drudge and Limbaugh are right but their eyes are wide shut. There's so much more. It was clear from early on that the face of the Lord was upon Matthew, as He reached out in judgement and wrath to strike the evil sodomites in South Florida.

http://shoebat.com/2016/10/05/hurri...d-savannah-for-supporting-the-evil-sodomites/

I guess the poor people in Haiti just got in the way. Happens. Collateral damage is the price of war. But as reported Matthew started acting strangely as it approached the US. Slowed down and sped up. A direct strike turned into a hard hooking 10 pin spare ball deflected right towards the heart of NASCAR country. Just about the time the Hurricane Hunter's specially modified Orions flew right into the eye of the storm. For "measurements". And Hurricane Hunters are ultimately controlled by NOAA. I think it was Lion asked a bit ago about controlling the weather. The thing to understand is that its a done deal. Chemtrails is pretty much, as we like to say around here, a proven fact. "Everything you are about to read is documented".

http://www.chemtrails911.com/

So when you connect the dots, the pattern emerge, and the stakes are clear. It's all out there, hiding in plain sight. Drudge just needs to try a bit harder, that's all.
 
Bruddah IZ said:
What policies should be implemented that are not already?
Click to expand...

I suppose there's no more delaying it. So many angles: hypocrisy, mendacity, tom-foolery, and plain old stubborn jackassery. But coming off science, maybe the next logical step is policy. First, here is something I read a bit ago that I thought you might enjoy, downloaded it, but forgot about. A good science story, sounds like interesting personalities behind it, international intrigue, maybe could be developed into something along the lines of "Empires of Light".
 

Attachments

  • 456451.pdf
    71.7 KB · Views: 4
As for policy, the whole rationale for developing and training something like CMIP5 is to run through simulations for different regulatory scenarios regarding the impact on GHG emissions on warming. In a nutshell, the scientific underpinnings for the Paris climate accords are based on these projections. Basically, we don't have the technology (yet) to do much about sinks so we have to reduce sources. And if we do warming will level off pretty fast. But the warming effect, sans sinks, will be persistent. Described in attached .pdf. So, in a logical, positivistic, "Enlightenment" view, such a scientifically formulated approach might be construed as self-interest, in today's parlance "best practices". Deviations from that view are perhaps where the discussion continues.
 

Attachments

  • nature18307.pdf
    437.8 KB · Views: 3
EvilGoalie 21 said:
As for policy, the whole rationale for developing and training something like CMIP5 is to run through simulations for different regulatory scenarios regarding the impact on GHG emissions on warming. In a nutshell, the scientific underpinnings for the Paris climate accords are based on these projections. Basically, we don't have the technology (yet) to do much about sinks so we have to reduce sources. And if we do warming will level off pretty fast. But the warming effect, sans sinks, will be persistent. Described in attached .pdf. So, in a logical, positivistic, "Enlightenment" view, such a scientifically formulated approach might be construed as self-interest, in today's parlance "best practices". Deviations from that view are perhaps where the discussion continues.
Click to expand...
Right. $ubsidies like the ones to Tesla's Musk have to be well $upported.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top