Im watching MLB and you're showing clips of 1965 little league semi finals..
Join the new century, EG.
Interesting, though.
I think I do see something printed on the other side of the pipe.
Climate and Weather
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
Join the new century, EG.
Interesting, though.
I think I do see something printed on the other side of the pipe.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
"Down in Joe's garage we didn't have no dope or LSD just a couple of quarts of beer would fix it so the intonation would not offend the ear and the same old chords going over and over...."
Post 742 I believe. Not just ∆°C. ∆°C/∆t.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
Science
1) Identify problem
2) Solve problem.
3) Tell me how you solved the problem.
4) Yes, it matters how good you are.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
Pattern from the GISTEMP data? Like I posted at some other point, the decadal anomaly data spanning mid 1960's to present fits pretty well to
y = 0.5SIN(6.26x) + 0.028x, y in °C and x in years starting graphing sequence at x = 0.
That describes the pattern. How do you think the first term of the equation means for the data profile? What about the second term?
Other data sources? For anomaly records I check out HadCrut every once in a while. I've been looking at the Huntsville group's data more frequently lately. If you're looking for a red team blue team excercise read the history of the Berkeley Earth Project. GISTEMP, however, is a great swinging breath for the koan.
My old house north of the 610 loop in Houston escaped the worst of Harvey, so that was good to hear. Just a blip.
EvilGoalie 21
GOLD
MLB-yawn. I'll watch the kids.
Multi Sport
DA
There's no getting through Gore followers. Ask them to explain past Ice Ages and their eyes glaze over... " but look, I have this chart!"
Multi Sport
DA
So how about a chart showing the last 6k years? Or 10k? How would that look?
He's not clever enough to do it himself, but just clever enough not to reveal his source and thus expose his level of gullibility.
Wez
DA
What would past Ice Ages have to do with a current discussion on AGW?
The question has never been, does Climate change over time. The question is, how much is man contributing to the current unusual spike up in Global temperature (since the industrial revolution starting pumping carbon into the atmosphere) and what are the consequences?
Nope! Formed it myself. Don't like bosses.
One can get a non-scientific but nonetheless technically interesting look at the degree of human influence versus possible natural warming processes by recognizing a couple of things --
1) Most human sources of CO2 are in the northern hemisphere, and
2) because of global wind patterns, especially the winds known as the trade winds, the northern and southern atmosphere components are partially isolated from each other.
That has resulted in a lag of CO2 concentration as measured in the south compared with the north. One might expect, then, that regardless of any natural background warming process (sunspots, volcanoes, eetc), if atmospheric CO2 is the driver, the north would be warming faster than the south.
Bruddah IZ
DA
The Totalitarian approach should yield something.
The biggest change with respect to reducing anthropogenic CO2 production in current technology is converting coal-powered electrical plants to operate on other fuels (usually natural gas), or replacing them altogether with renewable electrical energy sources (wind and solar predominate). What we are "forsaking" in that case is air pollution.