That you have posted dozens of time before. What is missing is the source of your mistaken analysis.
Climate and Weather
- Thread starter espola
- Start date
That you have posted dozens of time before. What is missing is the source of your mistaken analysis.
Uniformity isnt.
The obvious probable conclusion, based on the cycles of the last 400,000 years, is that we are at or near the top of one of these warming cycles.
Definition of sophistry
plural
sophistries
- 1: subtly deceptive reasoning or argumentation
Did you watch the Khan Academy video yet?
Wez
DA
I'll go with the opinions of the ppl with PHDs and apply the Scientific method to form opinions, over the grumpy plumber who leans on Breitbart like sources.
But of course there is and as I said it's the conclusion of scientists all over the world.
What percentage of warming is natural and what percentage is man made?
What would earth temps be today without human influence?
The climate doesn't care whether you are convinced.
Climate is not, and never has been static, therefor there is no baseline to quantify any real or percieved added warming caused or not caused by humans.
Percentage is not the best word to use there.
It cares just as much that you are.
Fail.
Fail right back at you.
Fail.
I agree - my opinion, just like yours, just like anyone's, has no effect on the wind, the rain, the temperature. Therefore we look for real physical causes.
As usual, you abandon any pretense of a serious discussion.
Im not the guy who harumped three "fails" in a row and pretends it means something.
You made erroneous statements similar to those you have made before when you were preparing to abandon the discussion.
Have you watched the Khan Academy video yet?
Sheriff Joe
DA
97%, we know.
How many people fell for the old hockey stick?
Sheriff Joe
DA
Nuance