Settled science?What does it matter? we know the current change in our climate is having some pretty harsh effects on our society worldwide and we should hope for the best but plan for the worst.
Settled science?What does it matter? we know the current change in our climate is having some pretty harsh effects on our society worldwide and we should hope for the best but plan for the worst.
Settled science?
How settled is the science?If it's possible agw is real then we should plan for how to mitigate it.
Arguing that it's not a possibility and we should do nothing out of the ordinary is foolish.
Then why are you so enamored by those who claim it is?Science is rarely settled
Then why are you so enamored by those who claim it is?
Then why are you so enamored by those who claim it is?
We tend to act on political consensus, agreed.See my edit
Which ones?I'm enamored with scientist who gives opinions based upon the scientific method
We tend to act on political consensus, agreed.
Ideally the science would be settled as well.Ideally political consensus is brought about through informed advisory.
Got that ratio yet?Of course you do. That was my point - you believe wingnut sources and reject the facts.
Ideally the science would be settled as well.
Unfortunately both ideals fall short.
How about some diced ratio to go with your word salad.Ideally political consensus is brought about through informed advisory.
Thats what they say.It depends on what your definition of settled is. an overwhelming agreement across the entire world wide scientific community tends to be the type of settled that people act on.
Thats what they say.
You seem convinced.
Espola and xazi are settled 99%.
The erasure of the medieval warming period, and the patchwork tree ring data for starters.
The scientific method is designed to disprove scientific theory.Mankind doesn't act on complete knowledge. the scientific method is designed to give us the highest degree of confidence to move forward in an uncertain world.
The scientific method is designed to disprove scientific theory.
Political theory is designed to move forward in an uncertain world.
The scientific method is designed to disprove scientific theory.
Political theory is designed to move forward in an uncertain world.
Please clarify?
Are you sure you're using the term scientific theory correctly?