Climate and Weather

watfly said:
San Diego has had 10 straight months of below normal temperatures, and California has had the coolest summer in a decade. I don't recall as mild as a summer in San Diego as this summer. Sorry Phoenix.
Click to expand...

Details --

voiceofsandiego.org

Why San Diego Has Escaped Stifling Heat this Year

August was San Diego's 10th consecutive month that ended up cooler than normal. A stretch that long hasn’t happened in town in more than a half century.
voiceofsandiego.org voiceofsandiego.org
.
 
watfly said:
San Diego has had 10 straight months of below normal temperatures, and California has had the coolest summer in a decade. I don't recall as mild as a summer in San Diego as this summer. Sorry Phoenix.
Click to expand...
June was very mild. Then Aug was pretty good. July was hot.
 
Stop me if this was already posted:

The regress problem

In Posterior Analytics I.2, Aristotle considers two challenges to the possibility of science. One party (dubbed the “agnostics” by Jonathan Barnes) began with the following two premises:

  1. Whatever is scientifically known must be demonstrated.
  2. The premises of a demonstration must be scientifically known.
They then argued that demonstration is impossible with the following dilemma:

  1. If the premises of a demonstration are scientifically known, then they must be demonstrated.
  2. The premises from which each premise are demonstrated must be scientifically known.
  3. Either this process continues forever, creating an infinite regress of premises, or it comes to a stop at some point.
  4. If it continues forever, then there are no first premises from which the subsequent ones are demonstrated, and so nothing is demonstrated.
  5. On the other hand, if it comes to a stop at some point, then the premises at which it comes to a stop are undemonstrated and therefore not scientifically known; consequently, neither are any of the others deduced from them.
  6. Therefore, nothing can be demonstrated.
 
Hüsker Dü said:
Stop me if this was already posted:

The regress problem

In Posterior Analytics I.2, Aristotle considers two challenges to the possibility of science. One party (dubbed the “agnostics” by Jonathan Barnes) began with the following two premises:

  1. Whatever is scientifically known must be demonstrated.
  2. The premises of a demonstration must be scientifically known.
They then argued that demonstration is impossible with the following dilemma:

  1. If the premises of a demonstration are scientifically known, then they must be demonstrated.
  2. The premises from which each premise are demonstrated must be scientifically known.
  3. Either this process continues forever, creating an infinite regress of premises, or it comes to a stop at some point.
  4. If it continues forever, then there are no first premises from which the subsequent ones are demonstrated, and so nothing is demonstrated.
  5. On the other hand, if it comes to a stop at some point, then the premises at which it comes to a stop are undemonstrated and therefore not scientifically known; consequently, neither are any of the others deduced from them.
  6. Therefore, nothing can be demonstrated.
Click to expand...
1697909950310.png
 
Natalee Holloway’s Head Was Smashed In, Body Thrown in Ocean for Refusing Sexual Advances from pycho Van Der Sloot.

“She asked to go back to her hotel but I was just trying to get dropped off a little bit further away from her hotel so we could, uh, walk back to her hotel and I might still get a chance to be with her,’’ van der Sloot said. “That’s what I was hoping for."
Really loser? So, she said no, and so you fucking killed her? These fucking men need to be taken off the planet. We got dumb fucks on here like Espola saying it's just find for a man to now claim to be a woman, all because he says so and the men should get what they want, right Espola? Just like this fucker. He wanted sex and Nataliee said no so the monster smashed her head in with a cement block. Wake up dads!!!
 
espola said:
Hottest September in the record --

View attachment 18574
Click to expand...
Don’t worry, lil E, your masters will give you a new crisis to promote soon. Never mind they underplay real crises at our border and in our cities - ones they created, of course. The one thing we can count on for the new crisis is that it will require great sacrifice of Liberty and money from the masses, will have a long time horizon with measurable results many years and ideally decades into the future. The goalposts will move with regularity and “science” will continue to be “redefined”. It’s coming soon E, don’t fret. Just make sure to wear your mask and get your COVID booster. If you really want to go the extra mile, throw some soup on museum paintings and glue your hand to the road to show your full commitment.
 
kickingandscreaming said:
Don’t worry, lil E, your masters will give you a new crisis to promote soon. Never mind they underplay real crises at our border and in our cities - ones they created, of course. The one thing we can count on for the new crisis is that it will require great sacrifice of Liberty and money from the masses, will have a long time horizon with measurable results many years and ideally decades into the future. The goalposts will move with regularity and “science” will continue to be “redefined”. It’s coming soon E, don’t fret. Just make sure to wear your mask and get your COVID booster. If you really want to go the extra mile, throw some soup on museum paintings and glue your hand to the road to show your full commitment.
Click to expand...
Coocoo.
 
kickingandscreaming said:
Don’t worry, lil E, your masters will give you a new crisis to promote soon. Never mind they underplay real crises at our border and in our cities - ones they created, of course. The one thing we can count on for the new crisis is that it will require great sacrifice of Liberty and money from the masses, will have a long time horizon with measurable results many years and ideally decades into the future. The goalposts will move with regularity and “science” will continue to be “redefined”. It’s coming soon E, don’t fret. Just make sure to wear your mask and get your COVID booster. If you really want to go the extra mile, throw some soup on museum paintings and glue your hand to the road to show your full commitment.
Click to expand...
So far, you don’t seem to have much of an argument there:
.
”lil E”- ad hominem attack implying your opponent is juvenile.
”real crises”- false dichotomy. (if the border is a problem, then climate change must not be a problem?)
”the new crisis”- weird hypothetical, implying that all crises are made up by the same secret cabal Crush believes in.
”long time horizon”- this one comes closer to being an argument. But you give no reason that real issues cannot have long time horizons.
“mask and covid booster”- utterly and completely off topic. “I disagree with you about issue A, therefore you’re wrong about issue M”.
.
And that’s all you offered.
.
If you really want to go the extra mile, actually talk about the issue. We’re emitting far more CO2 than plants and algae can process. Over time, this will increase global mean temperatures. Some marginal land will become submerged to simply too hot to inhabit.
.
I don’t really care whether you like to call it an “emergency”. That’s just quibbling over semantics. But there is a real issue here and you can do better than to hope that it’s all something the “scientists” made up just because they don’t want you to drive a Suburban.
 
dad4 said:
So far, you don’t seem to have much of an argument there:
.
”lil E”- ad hominem attack implying your opponent is juvenile.
”real crises”- false dichotomy. (if the border is a problem, then climate change must not be a problem?)
”the new crisis”- weird hypothetical, implying that all crises are made up by the same secret cabal Crush believes in.
”long time horizon”- this one comes closer to being an argument. But you give no reason that real issues cannot have long time horizons.
“mask and covid booster”- utterly and completely off topic. “I disagree with you about issue A, therefore you’re wrong about issue M”.
.
And that’s all you offered.
.
If you really want to go the extra mile, actually talk about the issue. We’re emitting far more CO2 than plants and algae can process. Over time, this will increase global mean temperatures. Some marginal land will become submerged to simply too hot to inhabit.
.
I don’t really care whether you like to call it an “emergency”. That’s just quibbling over semantics. But there is a real issue here and you can do better than to hope that it’s all something the “scientists” made up just because they don’t want you to drive a Suburban.
Click to expand...
Wrong again dumb dumb

mRNA COVID Vaccines Form Spike Protein in Heart Cells, but Cause Different Anomalies: Research Article
New research observing rat and human heart cells shows that within 48 hours of vaccination, the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines form spike proteins.

1 out 13 rats got Turbo Cancer from the jabs Dad. All you do is fucking lie!!!
 
dad4 said:
So far, you don’t seem to have much of an argument there:
.
”lil E”- ad hominem attack implying your opponent is juvenile.
”real crises”- false dichotomy. (if the border is a problem, then climate change must not be a problem?)
”the new crisis”- weird hypothetical, implying that all crises are made up by the same secret cabal Crush believes in.
”long time horizon”- this one comes closer to being an argument. But you give no reason that real issues cannot have long time horizons.
“mask and covid booster”- utterly and completely off topic. “I disagree with you about issue A, therefore you’re wrong about issue M”.
.
And that’s all you offered.
.
If you really want to go the extra mile, actually talk about the issue. We’re emitting far more CO2 than plants and algae can process. Over time, this will increase global mean temperatures. Some marginal land will become submerged to simply too hot to inhabit.
.
I don’t really care whether you like to call it an “emergency”. That’s just quibbling over semantics. But there is a real issue here and you can do better than to hope that it’s all something the “scientists” made up just because they don’t want you to drive a Suburban.
Click to expand...
He also missed the mark by a large margin in his suppositions about me.

That happens a lot around here.
 
espola said:
He also missed the mark by a large margin in his suppositions about me.

That happens a lot around here.
Click to expand...
What the fuck are you hiding from old man? Is this the only topic you have left to lie about? What a fucking moron!!!

"In November 2016, WikiLeaks published those emails.

The emails contained coded messages that connected several high-ranking Democratic Party officials (including Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama) and U.S. restaurants with a human trafficking and child sex ring.

One of those restaurants was Comet Pizza in Washington, D.C.

Much more evidence about Pizzagate was also recovered on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop.

This evidence included emails from Hillary Clinton, the infamous Frazzledrip video, and much more.

Once the world finds out about all of the evidence within the Podesta and Clinton emails, the Weiner laptop is going to make the Biden laptop look like child’s play." Real AF

These fucking people (if you want to call them that) are sick fucks. They will see their end very soon. Espola, Daddy and Husker Du will be with them as well, in their own hell, just for them. It's what they wanted and it's what their going to get. Choose wisely natives, because it's about to get very nasty in America. These fuckers let the Invasion happen. They let you get drugged and they helped your kids take the jabs. it's all here, On The Record.
 
dad4 said:
So far, you don’t seem to have much of an argument there:
.
”lil E”- ad hominem attack implying your opponent is juvenile.
”real crises”- false dichotomy. (if the border is a problem, then climate change must not be a problem?)
”the new crisis”- weird hypothetical, implying that all crises are made up by the same secret cabal Crush believes in.
”long time horizon”- this one comes closer to being an argument. But you give no reason that real issues cannot have long time horizons.
“mask and covid booster”- utterly and completely off topic. “I disagree with you about issue A, therefore you’re wrong about issue M”.
.
And that’s all you offered.
.
If you really want to go the extra mile, actually talk about the issue. We’re emitting far more CO2 than plants and algae can process. Over time, this will increase global mean temperatures. Some marginal land will become submerged to simply too hot to inhabit.
.
I don’t really care whether you like to call it an “emergency”. That’s just quibbling over semantics. But there is a real issue here and you can do better than to hope that it’s all something the “scientists” made up just because they don’t want you to drive a Suburban.
Click to expand...
So how would you get China and other nations to reduce their carbon emissions?

The US has substantially reduced its carbon emissions, yet apparently temperatures continue to rise. So regional measures don't appear to impact regional climate (assuming carbon emissions are the culprit in rising temperatures). How do you get the whole world onboard to reduce carbon emissions, when in some cases, their very survival relies on cheap, greenhouse gas emitting, energy?

Why should the US put itself at geopolitical disadvantage by not utilizing its oil and gas resources. Doesn't that make us less safe to rely on other countries for our energy needs, countries that don't value freedom and civil rights like we do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top