Climate and Weather

espola said:
I don't consider a website to be anything until I research its background. I also researched the background of Dr. Ball, the defendant in the Canadian case that got you so excited. He has a long history of stretching his qualifications, doing things like claiming to be a long-term professor of climatology when, in fact, he was a short-term professor of geography. You can look it up.
Click to expand...
https://principia-scientific.org/br...fraudster-makes-concessions-tim-ball-lawsuit/

Some history
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Dr.Ball is a statistician. He used a proof defense and the judge asked Mann to provide certain requested proofs of his work.
Mann refused to provide his proof and the case was tossed.

Dr. Mann lost.
Why does that upset you?
Click to expand...

Dr. Mann's work (including the "R2 regression") was reviewed by experts in the field of climate research before it could be published. Dr. Tim Ball is a geographer. How would you feel if the lead contractor on a job asked one of the landscapers to inspect your plumbing installation?

There is a Dr. Ball who is a statistician -- Dr. Patrick Ball --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Ball
Perhaps you have them confused.

Did you look up "R2 regression" yet? A real statistician (or, for that matter, anyone with even modest training in a laboratory science) would recognize the humor in that.
 
espola said:
Dr. Mann's work (including the "R2 regression") was reviewed by experts in the field of climate research before it could be published. Dr. Tim Ball is a geographer. How would you feel if the lead contractor on a job asked one of the landscapers to inspect your plumbing installation?

There is a Dr. Ball who is a statistician -- Dr. Patrick Ball --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Ball
Perhaps you have them confused.

Did you look up "R2 regression" yet? A real statistician (or, for that matter, anyone with even modest training in a laboratory science) would recognize the humor in that.
Click to expand...
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/08/michael-mann-refuses-to-produce-data-loses-case.php

He had 8 years to produce the data.
 
Ricky Fandango said:
Did the court ask the Mann to show his work or not?

I just quoted the article I posted. The particular quote is from a lawyer commenting on the case.
Read it again.
Click to expand...
Espola is correct. You are quoting one of your Twitter masters. Do you even know why you are discussing that case? In your brain, a defamation case = scientific findings about climate change?
 
espola said:
Sucker.
Click to expand...
God what idiots.
In the idiocracy, people liked Ricky recognize that the uneducated hold more sway on matters about which education is required than the educated! Trump has taught them well.
So they spout uneducated, non- factual things and believe them.
It works for those controlling them, because the real money in energy and gun manufacturing gives them the messages.
 
messy said:
God what idiots.
In the idiocracy, people liked Ricky recognize that the uneducated hold more sway on matters about which education is required than the educated! Trump has taught them well.
So they spout uneducated, non- factual things and believe them.
It works for those controlling them, because the real money in energy and gun manufacturing gives them the messages.
Click to expand...
Eight years to produce the data.
Now, he not only gets the case thrown out, but he's on the hook for court costs.

Who's the idiot here?
 
Ricky Fandango said:
I'll keep that in mind.
Good luck at the little league home run derby.
You're gonna need it, especially with that hockey stick.
Click to expand...
Does the hockey stick represent sone kind of symbol (ahem) that you’re really excited about, or is this just another of your pathetic attempts to deny climate change?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top